datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Superconductors could help spacecraft hover

R Colin Johnson

4/2/2008 1:56 PM EDT

The cold of space
The cold of space is enough to make the superconductors work--although for spacecraft inside the orbit of Mars, the superconductors will have to be shaded from direct sunlight in order to maintain their grip. With proper design, however, it should be possible to pull together and latch freestanding space modules without physical tethers, by rotating solar shades to provide solar heating and cooling that activates and controls the magnetic pinning functions.

Peck and his colleagues since 2005 have experimented with magnetic superconducting building blocks that self-assemble without physically touching. The initial funding for the Cornell project was under NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts, where Peck first showed how rotational and translational degrees of freedom could be fixed with magnetic flux pinning.

"We can place them in close proximity and let the magnets do the rest, never actually having to physically touch each other and without requiring power to maintain their positions and orientations," said Peck.

To perform micro-positioning functions, Peck plans to include tiny electromagnets that can be turned on and off to exactly position two modules, after which all the electromagnets could be powered down to lock the assembly into place.

"We believe that flux pinning can be used to assemble spacecraft in a reliable, safe and permanent way, but without all the pitfalls associated with mechanical components," said Peck.

By funding Peck's work, NASA hopes to chuck traditional single-spacecraft architectures in favor of clusters of wirelessly interconnected spacecraft modules--each able to contribute a unique capability to the cluster. These interconnected modules would travel in a loose formation to create a virtual spacecraft capable of delivering more than the sum of its parts.

"The biggest advantage of our approach to building such distributed, modular spacecraft is that if you have a power failure, the spacecraft does not start falling apart--all the components would remain in their relative locations despite any loss of power," said Peck.

Peck's current test bed resembles an airair hockey table that simulates weightlessness for pint-size modules. But within six months, he pledges to have a new test bed that will be capable of testing (on Earth) satellite-size modules pinned into position using superconductors and magnets. He predicts that the first in-space test will be to hold together the components of a simple communications satellite that are launched piecemeal, then assembled with magnetic pinning.





DarinSelby

11/15/2011 1:05 PM EST

Man thinks that he is so advanced just because he now has airliner jets and rockets. This idea of wanting to blast-off and jet around had its origins in Nazi-based rocketry inventions duringWWII.

This article Cleanup of Shuttle Launch Zone inspired me to research more in-depth about the environmental impact of rocketing to space. That has to also be factored into the overall cost of going into space, does it not? Who's to say it won't really take billions of $ to do a proper clean-up there? Stratospheric balloons could meet most scientific research needs, and do so at a mere 25 miles altitude, where 99.8% of the atmosphere is gone. Is this not the edge of space?

If the HUBBLE TELESCOPE could hold itself in place at 25 miles out, it basically could operate just as well as it does at its orbit at 347 miles. But, of course, it can't hold itself at such a low altitude, because it is not BUOYANT. It has to be at at almost 14X's higher altitude, or it does not work.

Consider the Pollution that was spewed forth into our atmosphere, just to get the Hubble telescope into its present, somewhat stable orbit! How many solid rocket fuel-launched repairs has it taken, each with compiling environmental consequences? For instance, the perchlorate disaster of Lockheed Martin, that has poisoned over 300+ wells in Texas with its rocket testing program.

It appears to me that the environmental destruction which continues to happen with each launch, could all be avoided by utilizing stratospheric balloon technology to it fullest potential.

These following webpages, I have gathered together historical information and environmental data about man's modern-day rocketing to space program.

http://darinselby.1hwy.com/FloatToSpace.html

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)