datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

AMD: Fighting the unbeatable foe

Bolaji Ojo

12/1/2008 12:01 AM EST

Blind ambition

Yet, attempting to shift the dynamics of the MPU market in favor of AMD has been the chief pursuit of the company's executives for decades. They continued deploying resources in furtherance of this goal even as it became obvious the competition was pulling away. AMD's blind desire to beat Intel in process technology and manufacturing efficiencies pushed its competitor to regularly revamp its product line, a strategy Intel honed years ago and which its executives believe has always worked for the company.

Nobody is suggesting AMD throw in the towel and let Intel establish a monopoly in the MPU market. But recognizing the limits of its resources would go a long way toward making the company a more successful IC vendor and bolstering its competitiveness in whichever segments it chooses to participate, commented Louis Savain, an independent software developer/researcher, in an EETimes Web forum.

"Everybody should know by now that AMD's only hope of competing successfully in the processor marketplace is to come up with a new technology that solves the multicore programming problem," Savain wrote. "It must either forge a new market or fall by the wayside. Unfortunately, AMD has been playing a 'monkey-see, monkey-do' game with Intel. The stark reality is that nobody can beat Intel at its own game."

But it wasn't always Intel's game. That's why AMD's Ruiz believes AMD can still trounce Intel, if it can successfully pay down debt—through the sale of business units, if necessary—transition into a more cost-efficient fabless manufacturer and get the courts to declare that Intel violates antitrust laws, thereby forcing the market into a more competitive balance.





deyyoung

12/2/2008 8:43 AM EST

Intel has been wanting us to believe this tripe for 10+ years now. I'll wager Mr. Ojo has some financial incentives from Intel ...

Sign in to Reply



octop

12/9/2008 5:59 AM EST

I agree that AMD is no match for Intel's resources, at least for now. However, I do not agree AMD is chasing "Blind Ambition" that needs negative "Reality Check". In fact, if we gauge the growth of this company from being 1 of the clone x86 microprocessor companies to later become the only survivor in x86 CPU market and the strongest competitor for Intel, should we call these achievements a product of "Blind ambition"?

In fact, the author of this article should discuss how AMD can sell survive market competition by using process technology an generation older than Intel (65nm vs 45nm) yet still staying relevant. To be fair, AMD might go default without financial injection from ATIC but that doesn't justify by viewing an catching-up company as desperate. The fact is, the latest flagship Intel CPU codename Nahalem, pocesses architecture similarity (i.e embedded memory controller, point-to-point communication bus like HT3 etc.) that AMD've been using a years ago.

It'd be a blind review if the author compare the resources of Intel to AMD and come to conclusion that AMD is not wise to continue competition & chase her dream. If it happen, Mr. Bolaji may need to pay uncompetitive price for a computer to write his articles in future if Intel remain a sole microprocessor producer.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)