News & Analysis
U.S.: Fake parts threaten electronic market
Bolaji Ojo
2/17/2010 11:41 AM EST
Incidents of parts counterfeiting reported by component suppliers, including companies in the semiconductor sector, shot up "dramatically" to 9,356 in 2008, up about 142 percent, from 3,868 in 2005, according to the Bureau, which said China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Malaysia and India were identified as the primary sources of counterfeit products by suppliers surveyed recently.
"The number of counterfeit incidents original component manufacturers (OCMs) encountered shows the seriousness of the counterfeiting issue," the Bureau said in a report. "OCMS that experienced counterfeits most frequently cited parts brokers as a source of counterfeit parts, followed by independent distributors and Internet-exclusive suppliers."
In 2007, the U.S. Defense Department commissioned the Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of Technology Evaluation, part of the Commerce Department, to conduct a survey of the electronic industrial base following concerns rising incidents of component counterfeiting could endanger the military equipment supply chain.
The Bureau subsequently survey five segments of the U.S. electronic supply chain, including component vendors, distributors and brokers, circuit board assemblers, contractors and subcontractors and agencies of the DoD.
The survey of 387 companies and organizations revealed extensive problems in the electronic industry supply chain and showed counterfeiters are targeting discrete products as well as microcircuit with "fake non-working parts" or "working copies of the original designs." Some counterfeit parts were also "new products re-marked as higher grade product," the Bureau said, adding that many of the new parts would work "but not at the desired level of functionality."
"The majority of counterfeit parts are being discovered because they are returned as defective, exhibit poor performance, or have incorrect markings or physical appearance," the Bureau said in a report. "A significant number of counterfeit incidents were uncovered because the customer suspected the parts were counterfeit."
Counterfeiters are lured by the easy profit they can make from pouring fake or substandard products into the supply chain and also because it is often very easy to introduce their counterfeit products into the system.
Many manufacturers, for instance, have limited resources for testing returned parts while OEMs who buy from the secondary markets often have no way of identifying counterfeit products until customers returned finished equipment because they either failed or performed below expectations.
Furthermore, "sixty seven percent of OCMs producing discrete components and 33 percent of OCMs producing microcircuit products do not maintain databases on either the counterfeit parts encountered or the incidents reported to them," the Bureau said.




ddeisz
2/17/2010 1:41 PM EST
What about recommending buying only from authorized distributors who are both authorized AND have traceability for every part?
Sign in to Reply
NorthshorePhil
2/18/2010 11:49 AM EST
Every MFG needs a good broker to survive. Esp in these days of allocation. The broker you choose will determine the quality of parts you get. It's all about protection and avoidance. OEMS must buy from Brokers certified CCAP-101, have Scanning Acoustic Microscope /DECAP/XRAY/CURVETRACE ect in house...like our company...our customers have never felt more assured on orders.
You cant stop china/counterfeiters. Their govt looks the other way.
You cant stop using a broker, your business will suffer greatly.
You can be smart about where you buy from.
Phil
NSComps
Sign in to Reply
ryankenny
2/18/2010 4:38 PM EST
Users and integrators of these counterfeit devices don't care if they are counterfeit -- as long as they work.
Just like users with 'Bots' on their computers don't care, as long as their computer works.
Either make them care, or they will only address the problem up to their threshold of pain (when the parts DON'T work).
Sign in to Reply
Etmax
2/24/2010 7:35 AM EST
I had an assembly that needed an MGP20N40CL and got a local board loader to source and place the component. Turned out the entire batch would not operate at 5V gate drive but rather needed 10V
All I can say is what do you expect when you give your technology to a bunch of counterfeiters. The Asian suppliers aren't the only ones that were chasing a quick buck. The companies that outsourced their wafer assembly, and in some cases their entire production are just as guilty.
Sign in to Reply
KirkMc
2/25/2010 1:01 PM EST
When I was working at JPL a failure analysis of some parts revealed they were generic and not JAN parts although they were marked as such. Fortunately in this case the perp was identified but I thought he needed far worse punishment. RICOH needs to be automatically invoked in these cases, time needs to be 10 years no parole instead of 18 months with early release.
Counterfeit bolts were involved in the Chicago airliner crash a few years back. That was murder and should have been convicted as such. And international cooperation must be INSISTED upon. Only a sociopath would counterfeit high tensile bolts. Goes beyond greed.
Sign in to Reply
Steven I
3/3/2010 4:29 PM EST
ddeisz, that should be the general rule to follow and it should be strictly enforced. However, with military contracts requiring long term support, it is not always possible. Therefore, as Phil stated, you need to find a supplier that specializes in counterfeit detection techniques. The test house will broker the parts, perform any and all tests that you require and submit a report to you. The great thing is that you never pay for them unless they pass the testing. We have had great success with that approach and we do get many failures during testing, so the test houses are honest.
Sign in to Reply