News & Analysis
Comment
peter.clarke
This is a difficult area which is underlain by complex chemistry and biochemical ...
Kiran_NSN
I feel occupational health and Safety should be considered as a highest priority ...
Samsung commissions chip cancer safety study
Peter Clarke
7/15/2010 8:43 AM EDT
LONDON – Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. has commissioned an independent study of health and safety at its semiconductor factories, according to an Associated Press report. The move comes after lobbyists mounted a campaign that highlighted clusters of cancer illnesses and deaths and demanded compensation from Samsung for affected workers and their families.
The study is set to take one year and will be conducted by an independent team of occupational health and safety experts led by Environ International, the report said quoting a company statement. No indication was given as to the likely cost of the study.
The lobbying groups include: the Asian Network for the Rights of Occupational Accident Victims (ANROAV), Supporters for the Health and Rights of People in the Semiconductor industry (SHARPs), which is part of the Korean Institute of Labour Safety and Health (KILSH) and the Korean Metal Workers' Union (KMWU).
A lawsuit was filed in January, against a South Korean government agency which claimed that incidences of leukemia and lymphoma were caused by exposure to radiation and benzene in Samsung wafer fabs, the report said.
Samsung a leading manufacturer of consumer electronics, mobile phones, and the ICs and displays that go in them, has always denied responsibility for such deaths as there have been. It has denied using benzene and said that past studies have found no correlation between working conditions and employee illnesses. According to a Reuters report the chip production lines where some of the employees worked and later developed illnesses have been converted into chip test lines and light emitting diode production lines.
"We have assembled a group of well-respected international experts to ensure this is an objective and transparent review," the report quoted Cho Soo-in, president of Samsung's memory division, as saying in the statement. "We want to ensure this process addresses any questions about the safety of our semiconductor manufacturing facilities." Samsung said the review would be conducted in consultation with experts from academic institutions including the Harvard University School of Public Health, the report added.
Related links and articles:
Samsung opens up over cancer allegations
Samsung warns of 3-D TV health hazards
Samsung's ARM roadmap leads to quad-core 'Aquila'
|
|
|
|
|
Kiran_NSN
7/15/2010 12:56 PM EDT
I feel occupational health and Safety should be considered as a highest priority by any one manufacturing industry. Semiconductor industry is no exception form this. With the sky rocketing demand for the semiconductors and the invention of future demanding products like solar cells the manufacturing industry is already set for huge growth. And the global players in the semicon industry should set new standards for the safety and health of all the employees. I wish samsung will come out clean and the result of this survey could make things better!
Sign in to Reply
peter.clarke
7/16/2010 6:37 AM EDT
This is a difficult area which is underlain by complex chemistry and biochemical effects. Unfortunately, one thing to bear in mind is that any review of H&S practice done now cannot shed much light on practices in the past.
So it is unlikely that the year-long study will be able to provide any evidence of any alleged wrong-doing, but it may be able to say that Samsung is following good practice now.
As such there is a tendency for such a review to become a PR fig-leaf, through no fault of the investigators I would add. It is not so much the data as how the data is interpreted that becomes contentious.
And those interpretations can bend in both directions: the bereaved may be pushed to see patterns in clusters of cancers that are not really there, while management may be tempted to do nothing or cut corners for the sake of increased productivity and profitability.
The key thing is that the review is thorough, open and transparent, and then at least such as lessons as can be learned can be transferred to other plants.
Sign in to Reply