News & Analysis
Comment
Frank Eory
Intel is about a decade late to this game. Retail cable set-top boxes and the ...
Dr.Consumer Device
Those of you remember Intel with Level one and Vxtel aquisitions nows how intel ...
Update: Intel buying TI's cable modem business
8/16/2010 12:56 PM EDT
SAN FRANCISCO — Intel Corp. has agreed to acquire Texas Instruments Inc.'s cable modem product line, the company said Monday (Aug. 16). Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.
Intel (Santa Clara, Calif.) said it plans to combine TI's Puma product lines with the Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) standard technology and Intel SoCs to deliver advanced set top box, residential gateway and modem products for the cable industry. The objective is to provide cable OEMs with an open and powerful platform for delivering innovative and differentiated products to service providers that improve the video, voice and data content experience at home, the company said.
All employees of TI's cable modem team received offers to join Intel at sites in their home countries, primarily Israel, and will become part of Intel’s Digital Home Group, Intel said. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter, the company said.
Observers have in recent weeks said Intel was signaling that it was interested in re-entering the communications chip market. Earlier this month Will Strauss, principal analyst at Forward Concepts Inc., said Intel was the most likely buyer of Infineon's wireless business, which is now up for sale. Broadcom Corp. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. are also considered potential suitors for Infineon's wireless group, which generated about $1.2 billion in sales last year, according to Strauss.
"Intel is buying TI’s cable modem solution in order to bolster its front-end cable set-top box solution," said Gary Mobley, an analyst with Benchmark Equity Research, in a report circulated Tuesday.
According to Gary Mobley, an analyst with Benchmark Equity Research, Intel has for years promoted its Atom processor as an alternative to RISC-based processors for the $3 billlion set-top box chip market. Mobley said Atom has captured a few STB wins, including Google TV and a few IPTV boxes, but that Broadcom Corp. and ST Microelectronics NV continue to dominate the space.
"While Intel gains a better front-end solution with its TI modem acquisition, several hurdles remain before Atom gains traction as a set-top box processor," Mobley said.
Makers of set top boxes like Motorola and Cisco have software and hardware teams trained to use RISC-based processors, Mobley said. Moving to a CISC-based processor like Atom would require them to reshuffle an ecosystem that they have spent years developing, Mobley said.



Frank Eory
8/16/2010 1:36 PM EDT
It was easy to forget that TI was still in the cable modem chip business, after it's ill-fated acquisition of Libit a decade ago. But if Intel wants to make a play in cable set-top boxes or gateways, it needs this IP -- so maybe this is a win-win for both parties.
Sign in to Reply
Tunrayo
8/16/2010 3:11 PM EDT
This is definitely a win for Intel. The cable modem business should remain vibrant for keeps. It is a consumer-driven business and history has shown that consumers will keep paying for innovative products delivered via this medium.
The cable modem is the key to growth and innovation in this industry since it determines how much data can be multiplexed onto existing cable infrastructures.
Sign in to Reply
eewiz
8/16/2010 9:35 PM EDT
I guess Intel Intend to develop Atom based SoCs for internet connected Set-top boxes by using TI's technology. This will help to replace traditional cable modem and Settop box and make it a single device. The chip could be running Android OS and might have support for Google TV.
http://www.intel.com/inside/smarttv/
Sign in to Reply
Frank Eory
8/18/2010 2:25 PM EDT
Intel is about a decade late to this game. Retail cable set-top boxes and the ridiculous CableCards that enable them have been abysmal failures in the market.
So far, the one truism in digital cable hardware at the residential end has been if the end box isn't made by Motorola or Cisco/Scientific Atlanta, it doesn't count. If the DOCSIS/MPEG2 silicon that powers it isn't made by Broadcom, it doesn't count.
Intel could perhaps buy it's way in, but they are pushing a rope uphill on this one.
Sign in to Reply
Jimelectr
8/17/2010 12:21 AM EDT
Well, all I can say to Intel is "Good luck!" We at Broadcom have been in this cable modem game for a long time. As far as Infineon's wireless group goes, I haven't heard anything around Broadcom about that, but then I wouldn't tell you even if I had! $1.2 billion in revenue is nothing to sneeze at, though.
Sign in to Reply
pbhushan
8/17/2010 1:39 AM EDT
I am sure Intel has done its homework when taking its decision. Its driving adoption from both ends : partnering with Yahoo to cover the content front & now boost its platform strategy with TI's platforms.
Intel has its own strong portfolio in the Cable side for both DocSiS & MoCA. I would expect to see a lot more action from Intel. We may perhaps see innovative prototypes for CES-2011
Sign in to Reply
resistion
8/17/2010 2:42 AM EDT
Times certainly have changed. I remember Andy Grove insisting that PC will not lose to TV in the "war for eyeballs". This development suggests otherwise. But I hardly find TV a big field to go into. There are only so many channels. It's nothing compared to what YouTube can become.
Sign in to Reply
Dr.Consumer Device
8/18/2010 1:10 PM EDT
Those of you remember Intel with Level one and Vxtel aquisitions nows how intel can handle non_PC operations. Good luck Intel, second time fail royally.
Entire management only knows how to do PC and Flash (mainly due to Fab advantage).
Sign in to Reply