News & Analysis
Comment
rick.merritt
@Ken: An MIT person on a panel at yesterday's FCC event talked about using ...
KenKrechmer
There is a different approach to spectrum utilization, that seems not to be on ...
FCC gives more details on spectrum plan
Rick Merritt
10/21/2010 1:43 AM EDT
SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. – The U.S. Federal Communications Commission released more details today about its plans for spectrum reallocation as part of a workshop on the issue available online.
Industry is hungry for more spectrum, but competing sectors see no clear path to getting what they want without stepping on someone's existing allocations. In particular, hopes for new systems using reclaimed spectrum in the analog TV spectrum--the so-called "white spaces"—are diminishing.
The FCC released on its Web site a 30-page report describing the need for 300 MHz in additional spectrum by 2014, virtual real estate it valued at about $120 billion. The report projected 35-fold growth in mobile data over the next five years.
Earlier this year the FCC said as part of the U.S. national broadband plan it will free up 500 MHz of spectrum within ten years and 300 MHz of it within five years.
"We are facing an explosion of growth in mobile data," said Julius Genachowski, chairman of the FCC in a keynote address online. "The coming spectrum crunch is a vital issue for our economy, and we have to solve this for our mobile future," he said.
The FCC has already freed up 25 MHz in WCS bands and has proposed freeing up 90 MHz of satellite spectrum, Genachowski said.
Industry groups forecast they need as much as 800 to 1300 MHz--significantly more spectrum than the FCC outlined—to deal with the exploding use of mobile data over the next decade. However, they see no easy path even to getting the 300 MHz the FCC has promised.
"You can't see what's happened with smartphones and say we have enough spectrum," said Lynn Claudy, senior vice president for science and technology for the National Association of Broadcasters, speaking in a panel discussion at the annual Consumer Electronics Association meeting here.
The single biggest swath of the first 300 MHz—about 120 MHz—is expected to come from space reserved for analog TV channels. But Claudy expressed grave reservations about how that much free spectrum can be found in broadcaster's channels.
Proceedings on the 120 MHz swath are expected to start before the end of the year. But action may need to wait until Congress takes up the issue of spectrum reform, likely in 2011.
"That’s when things will really start heating up," said Tom Dombrowsky, an engineering consultant at Wiley Rein LLP and an expert on telecommunications policy issue.
Congress is expected to offer spectrum holders the right to the proceeds from auctions of any spectrum they return to government as part of the reallocation plan. It may also force a national spectrum inventory, an effort that could take two years.
Claudy said broadcasters want both the inventory and the so-called incentive auctions. "If congress moves forward on incentive auctions then 120 MHz moves forward, but not without it," he said.
Genachowski said the FCC will consider at its November meeting a laundry list of new ideas. They include a plan for incentive auctions, broadcast channel sharing, experimental licensing for new technologies and opportunistic use of spectrum through technologies such as cognitive radio.
The FCC is also creating a new advisory group to explore business innovations in spectrum use. The group is chaired by Tom Wheeler, managing director of Core Capital Partners.
Genachowski called for broad input from the private sector on the issue. The workshop brought together executives from Cisco, Dell, Intel, Morgan Stanley, T-Mobile and Qualcomm.

FCC chair Julius Genachowski called for action on "spectrum crunch."



rick.merritt
10/21/2010 1:32 PM EDT
What are your spectrum needs and what do you want the FCC to do about it?
Sign in to Reply
kinnar
10/21/2010 3:19 PM EDT
It is quite true that the Analog TV VHF and UHF band is occupying too much amount of band space in the best electronically usable area of frequencies. An exercise need to be done to put all broadcasting channels in a compact area and make the gaps free in a way it will be compatible with the existing television receivers. This is a very good effort started by FCC.
Sign in to Reply
LarryM99
10/21/2010 5:36 PM EDT
While I was reading this article I was imagining all of the lobbyist visits and all of the contributions changing hands that it took to make what is being described happen. No one ever said that utilization of this spectrum in this manner would make the most money. What was said was that maybe it was in the best interests of the citizenry of the US and the advancement of the technology. I can't say that it shocks me, but I can say that it saddens me if they get away with it.
Larry M.
Sign in to Reply
KenKrechmer
10/21/2010 6:01 PM EDT
There is a different approach to spectrum utilization, that seems not to be on the table. Assigning a very narrow band clear channel only for the purpose of negotiation between communicating ends. Of course this is only useful for future systems that can utilize it, not legacy systems.
One purpose of this channel is to support continuted interconnection even when interference blocks the main channel. This makes possible rapid handover to all alternate bands as main channel blockages occur.
Sign in to Reply
rick.merritt
10/22/2010 11:58 AM EDT
@Ken: An MIT person on a panel at yesterday's FCC event talked about using shared spectrum in the future which sounds like a similar idea to what you are proposing. I'd like to hear more about the concept and any electroncis behind it.
Sign in to Reply