News & Analysis

Comment


MikeLC

10/31/2010 12:45 AM EDT

I think data bears out that CO2 is higher than ever in recent geological time ...

More...



Sanjib.Acharya

10/30/2010 10:51 PM EDT

Hi Iniewski, I understand it correct, Chanj is anticipating that the ultra-dense ...

More...

Google, Avatar chiefs talk climate change

Rick Merritt

10/28/2010 1:09 AM EDT

SAN JOSE, Calif. – The chief executive of Google and the director of "Avatar" shared thoughts on technology, cinema and climate change in an on-stage interview at the Churchill Club here.

James Cameron talked about his use of behavior modeling in "Avatar," using video capture and image processing to create lifelike faces in computer graphics (see video here). Separately, he said believes stereo 3-D technology could go mainstream in as few as five years assuming technology breakthroughs to pack pixels into the ultra-dense displays needed for glasses-free screens (see video here).

Cameron said he is committed to his next project, filming two sequels to "Avatar." The movies will be created in tandem as part of one production flow. "Avatar 2" is slated for release in four years, followed a year later by "Avatar 3," he said.

The movies will hearken back to Cameron's earlier picture "Titanic" with some shots exploring the undersea world of the fictional planet Pandora. Just as Cameron helped advance the state of stereo 3-D cinema with "Avatar," he plans to make further technical inventions with its sequels.

Cameron said the sequels will be shot and shown at a higher native frame rate than the 24 frames/second standard used today.

"We are looking at the efficacy of 48, 60 and 72 frames/second solutions," Cameron said. "Projectors can run at 144 Hz today, but still generate 24 frames/s--the trick is how to multi-flash to display images at higher hertz rates," he added.

In addition, he hopes to develop real-time scene prototyping tools that eliminate what is today a six-month process to create realistic moving images using computer graphics.

Today in real time directors can "create what looks like a 1980's era video game product we then give to graphics companies--we want to eliminate that middle step," he said. "Fifteen years from now directors will work in real time using photo-realistic images," he added.

Cameron: Preparing to shoot "Avatar 2" in 48-72 frames/s

But the brunt of the evening's talk focused on climate change, a topic Cameron and his interviewer, Google chief executive Eric Schmidt, share as a passion. In between making the "Avatar" sequels, Cameron plans to make TV and cinema documentaries about climate change.

Cameron said a two-degree temperature change in the world's oceans "will take out all the coral reefs. Sixty percent of species could be extinct in this century with climate change," he added.

"It's highly unlikely there will be [a carbon] cap and trade [law] in the next six years, so we have six more years of inaction on putting a price on carbon emissions, and that’s a fundamental problem," said Schmidt who serves on a panel of science and technology advisors to U.S. President Obama.

"All the modeling says even with the current modest reductions we are nowhere near the needed 60-70 percent reductions in carbon emissions" to halt climate change, Schmidt said. "In my view is its going to take some kind of event and a conversation among leaders [to motivate policy change], and I don’t think it will happen soon," he added.

"It's probably the toughest challenge the human race has ever faced," said Cameron whose blockbuster movie was in part a statement about the need for greater environmental awareness. "I believe ultimately this has to be approached as a children's crusade," he said.

Schmidt: Foresees no cap and trade bill for at least six years





jjdraw

10/28/2010 3:57 PM EDT

did they share any thoughts on how GOOGLE CHEATS ON THEIR TAXES !!!!!

Sign in to Reply



Silicon_Smith

10/29/2010 1:28 AM EDT

How about "Taxes on the Cheats" instead??

Sign in to Reply



chanj

10/28/2010 7:34 PM EDT

Economic advancement is an exchange of natural resources. The more we produce; the more we consume. Theoretically speaking, ultra-dense displays require more energy to allow light emission in multiple angles which, in effect, creates a 3D image with no glasses needed. The more energy is required; the more carbon dioxide is going to produce. Is it an irony discussion of 3D technology and global warming in the same talk?

Nonetheless, it is always a good sign when the influential people are talking about climate change.

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

10/29/2010 11:22 AM EDT

to @chanj...somewhat dis-agree, there has been numerous serious studies that basically say that rate of progress is related to increase of energy consumption...if you lower energy consumption of one unit simply more people will use it (or one person will use multiple units)...electronics gear might be lower power but now I own several phones, laptops, TVs etc in my small household of two...agree on linking 3D and climate change, make no sense at all! Kris

Sign in to Reply



Sanjib.Acharya

10/30/2010 10:51 PM EDT

Hi Iniewski, I understand it correct, Chanj is anticipating that the ultra-dense displays for creating 3D images without glasses would consume more power than the normal 2D displays...and hence he is more carbon emission as people move to 3D.

Sign in to Reply



MikeLC

10/31/2010 12:45 AM EDT

I think data bears out that CO2 is higher than ever in recent geological time (and that's a lot of years). I agree with Silicon_Smith partially, but actually think such taxes should include the complete strain the particular society/industry is putting on the planet.

Also, I think we should be more respective of all our resources, not just energy-making ones, in my opinion.

In regards to the articles predicting the state of 3D in display. It's been coming for decades. I actually believe wearable displays will be the future eventually. Very low energy, higher durability and lower cost. Take a look at Microvision, for example.


Sign in to Reply



Silicon_Smith

10/29/2010 1:36 AM EDT

I would say, though economic advancement has been an exchange for natural resources, there is always a way of not putting pressure on the environment and still get away with it. The need is, of course for a focussed research and implementation. Governments worldwide have started pushing the capitalists with ETS(Emissions trading schemes), taxes on carbon essentially, which is the right way to spur climate control.

Sign in to Reply



Luis Sanchez

10/29/2010 3:30 AM EDT

I heard that the global warming going on isn't very much caused by the human.
If we study the earth's history we can see that we are going out from an Ice-age and that is why we are seeing overall temperature increase.

Sign in to Reply



Manolito33

10/29/2010 4:23 AM EDT

The propaganda says that there is not a climate problem and in any case is not cause by human civilization. That´s bullshit.

The world population is not the problem bbubtb but not sharing the resursers.

Abaut the oil. Think that the oil has been capture bby the nuture below the soil for thaousands of years. Now the civilization forcing peak it up and the effect of that on the climate can you read in any place: google

:O((

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

10/29/2010 10:26 AM EDT

Do we need a carbon cap and trade law?

Sign in to Reply



Mark Wehrmeister

10/29/2010 2:43 PM EDT

If we provide the right financial incentives or penalties perhaps a law isn't actually needed.

Sign in to Reply



markjt_19

10/29/2010 3:29 PM EDT

I like the 3D movies

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

EE Buzz DesignCon

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)