News & Analysis
Comment
SageSim
At SageSim we have an modeler to show you the payback you could see by ...
tmh86
Stan, the clear scientific evidence would lead us to "go along with" all four ...
China devotes its energy to green development
Bruce Rayner
2/7/2011 11:44 AM EST
Beijing is famous for its landmarks—the Forbidden City, Tiananmen Square, the Great Hall of the People—and notorious for its air quality. On Jan. 26, the U.S. Embassy in the Chinese capital reported the average daily air quality index was in the red zone. That’s face-mask conditions for the average motorist and bicyclist. The sad truth is that Beijing is in the red zone far too often.
The city’s pollution problem is largely self-inflicted, a result of China’s reliance on coal to power the country’s booming economy. About 70 percent of China’s power—85 quadrillion BTUs a year—comes from coal. By 2035, the country’s consumption of coal is expected to rise in absolute terms to about 112 quadrillion BTUs. The consolation for Beijing’s residents is that China is starting to invest in cleaner, more efficient coal-fired plants.
The emissions from coal are nasty and include nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide. SO2 and CO2 are greenhouse gases. Since 2008, China has held the unenviable distinction of being the world’s top CO2-emitting nation, according to the Paris-based International Energy Agency. At 6.5 billion metric tons of CO2 a year, China’s output beats that of the former leader, the United States, by about 1 billion metric tons and amounts to about 22 percent of the world’s total annual CO2 emissions. (The U.S. still holds the top rank when it comes to CO2 per capita.)
![]() |
China is well aware of its ranking and its predicament. With GDP growth of 8 to 10 percent a year expected for the foreseeable future, it’s doubtful that China’s 1.3 billion people can hope to enjoy their newfound wealth in relative environmental comfort unless the country starts cleaning up its act. Thanks in part to its one-party system, it is doing just that.
![]() Click on image to enlarge. |
Clean energy powerhouse
There’s a consensus among analysts that China is on its way to becoming a dominant player in the global clean energy business. In the past few years, the country has outspent other nations on renewable energy technology and infrastructure, including wind, solar, electric vehicles and the batteries that power them. Hydroelectric and nuclear power also figure prominently in the country’s energy plans.
Based on government and industry publications and actions—including China’s 12th Five Year Plan, which sets the national governmental agenda for 2011-2015—the country’s renewable energy sector is poised for strong growth, both domestically and overseas, over the next few years.
Ernst & Young calls China the “clear leader” in the renewable space, ranking the country first in its latest “Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index” report, published in November. The previous leader, holding the title for three and a half years, was the United States; it now is five points behind China.
Similarly, a recent Pew Charitable Trusts report calls China the “world’s clean energy powerhouse.” The country spent $34.6 billion in the renewable energy sector in 2009, according to Pew; that’s nearly twice the U.S. figure of $18.6 billion. Granted, the United States was in the midst of the Great Recession that year. But even as its economy recovers, many pundits say, it’s unlikely the country will regain the lead, given the rhetoric coming out of Washington following the midterm elections.
Built-asset consultancy EC Harris (London) estimates that China invested $120 billion to $160 billion in renewable energy between 2007 and 2010. The consultancy ranks China’s clean energy investment climate fourth, behind Germany, France and the United States. The investment factors considered include energy policy, incentives, subsidies, purchasing quotas and tax breaks.
“The Chinese government has set an ambitious target of becoming the world leader in terms of design, development and production of renewable energy technologies, and has invested huge sums of money into developing this sector,” said Mark Stewart, an EC Harris partner. “The aim is to diversify away from producing cheap goods and into developing and producing high-tech, high-value, homegrown technologies, starting with those in the renewable energy sector.”
Today, China generates less than 8 percent of its total energy from wind, solar, nuclear and hydroelectric power, but the nation’s goal is to double nonfossil-fuel-based energy production to 15 percent by 2020, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Coal’s share of the pie is expected to decline to 62 percent by 2035.
Hydroelectric power generation in China will increase significantly as the Three Gorges Dam comes online. When completed this year, the dam will be the largest hydroelectric power plant in the world, with capacity of 22.5 GW. Dams, of course, have their own environmental implications, and the Three Gorges project has stirred controversy at home and abroad. But renewable energy sources, notably wind and solar, are also expected to see dramatic growth in China over the next 10 years.
Next: Strong wind




docdivakar
2/7/2011 4:07 PM EST
@Bruce Rayner: good article, very timely and informative.
Looking at the chart of top-5 CO2 emitters, India is quite low when compared to the emissions from US whose population is nearly 1/4th of India's whereas the emissions are nearly five fold. By that token, it is easy to see why China officials would argue against CO2 caps while their emission is 1/3rd of USA, adjusted for percapita.
In spite of the above, it is quite admirable to see China galloping ahead in its progress for green energy. The Chinese government clearly sees beyond the environmental concerns as the motivators to get ahead. It is the business opportunity in the green economy where many western 'green' economy businesses would founder if it weren't for the government subsidies. The Chinese solar businesses are already getting closer to 1$/watt metric for the solar and it wouldn't surprise me if they break that barrier to the low side within the next five years.
Dr. MP Divakar
Sign in to Reply
Bruce Rayner
2/7/2011 8:57 PM EST
I agree that the Chinese are looking beyond the immediate environmental threat to the business opportunities in renewables. And you're right that its the per capita, not the total output of CO2 that the Chinese and India are focusing on. They want to get their's too!
And with peak oil around the corner (50 years of petroleum remaining in hard-to-find and high-cost offshore site) thier logic makes perfect sense.
Will China dominate? Many say yes, because it has the political will - and a one-party system.
Sign in to Reply
Roy H
2/7/2011 4:59 PM EST
China is the only country researching LFTRs. Liquid Flouride Thoroium Reactors were invented by ONLR in the 1960s and is proven technology. Needs some refinement mostly in long lasting materials. LFTRs should be much cheaper to build than conventional LWRs and Thorium is cheap and abundant. LFTRs are much more efficient and produce pratically no radio-active waste, and that little amount decays in 300 years instead of 10000. See: www.energyfromthorium.com
When China perfects this, we will be able to buy them and solve our energy problems.
Sign in to Reply
pixies
2/7/2011 6:01 PM EST
Nuclear reactors will not solve our problem. According to Nathan Lewis, if the world were to rely entirely on nuclear energy, we would be building 2 reactors every day for the next fifty years and by the time we finished these reactors, we would run out of nuclear fuel immediately.
That said, China desperately need "clean" energy, just look at the helling skies in most major cities in china you will now why.
Sign in to Reply
Bruce Rayner
2/7/2011 9:34 PM EST
Nuclear is a key technology for China's future domestic energy production. But do you think it's exportable to countries like the US and members of the EU? How about the developing world?
Sign in to Reply
PHW_#1
2/8/2011 12:35 AM EST
Anybody ever counted how many jobs have been created for Green development? My current guess is millions from a simple assembly worker to high pay RD engineers. Feed-in-taff is a government sponsored system, same concept across the whole world not China-only program. The subsidy can be used to create an industry in their own country, or just hand over the whole industry to China eventually. If the politician can just learn from China, we will find our money is not used on social welfare for unemployment but to create millions of jobs for an industry.
Sign in to Reply
Sheeptrik
2/8/2011 4:18 AM EST
Hi, my comment on al this is verry simpel !
As long as, (special the west Europeen) governments depent from taxes comming from oil products they don't gona promote the EV's and renuable energy scources !
Only people like me (and?)shell try to switch over on renuable energy and EV's.
Again, the investments in time and money has to comme from the simple man like always !!
Sign in to Reply
Stan.Cehonski
2/8/2011 9:56 AM EST
While this is an interesting article I have to ask: What is wrong with CO2? Aren't you exhaling it right now? Don't plants use it for food? Hasn't it been around forever? The emperor has no clothes. To go along with this you need to believe ALL of the following:
1.) The planet is warming(there is some debate)
2.) It is caused by man's CO2 emissions.(Some data shows CO2 lags temp rise)
3.) The results will be catastrophic.(Do we know what the proper temperature is?)
4.) We can do something about it. (Even the GW folks admit that massive changes in emissions will do very little)
There. I feel better. :)
Sign in to Reply
pixies
2/8/2011 10:13 AM EST
Stan: So what you are saying is that since we are going to hell in a hand basket we should just close our eyes and enjoy the ride? It is global climate change, not just global warming, just turn on weather channel you have to admit the global climate is messed up. Actually since human has so much impact on almost all aspects of the environment, it is hard to believe the CO2 produced by human has no impact on the environment. Also, we you are peddling here is beside the point, China needs to clean up not because of CO2, just look at the the skies in China and take a deep breath you will understand the power of human being (in screwing up the environment.)
Sign in to Reply
Bruce Rayner
2/8/2011 12:26 PM EST
You can believe what you like about the merits or dangers of CO2 but you can't deny that China is moving full steam ahead to build an industrial sector to develop and manufacture a variety of renewable energy technologies. An industry that has the potential to dominate world markets.
Sign in to Reply
tmh86
2/10/2011 11:53 AM EST
Stan, the clear scientific evidence would lead us to "go along with" all four items you listed.
But you may be missing the larger point, which is that the economic reasons for developing renewable energy are by themselves enough reason to invest heavily in it. China is making a strong move to become the technology and production leader in this industry.
Sign in to Reply
Neo1
2/9/2011 1:47 AM EST
Yes, China is now funding green technology because of the favorable balance of payments running to billions of $$$. They take the time to enhance their per-capita with black coal and once everyone has enough $$ in his pocket they will thin of going green. Well, I don't fault them and there is nothing astonishing in this turn of events- once you grow to a certain size it makes perfect sense to look at green energy and technology because that is going to be the big $$ earner in the future. It has nothing to do with concern for environment.
Just one news, say of new discoveries of oil which can last a hundred years or more will turn these initiatives by 180 degrees!
Sign in to Reply
Test_engineer
2/9/2011 9:21 AM EST
Yo Neo1: We have in Canada the second largest deposit of oil in the world; conservative estimates range from 300 billion to 1 trillion barrels of recoverable oil in the Alberta/Saskatchewan oil sands. The Chinese are now becoming major players here supplanting the Americans for whom this oil is not "green enough"- whatever that means. Say what you want about the current Chinese leadership: they have no self doubts about their country or where it is going. Neither, for that matter, has Canada. We will produce and refine this oil regardless of all the wacko environmental groups out there.The Great White North rules!
Sign in to Reply
SageSim
2/12/2011 5:32 AM EST
At SageSim we have an modeler to show you the payback you could see by installing a green system at home. You will be surprised that it takes a significant time to recoup the costs of going green.
http://www.sagesim.com/Models/sgs_r2.htm
Sign in to Reply