datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


Jack.L

4/16/2011 12:10 AM EDT

It is not a matter of impressive but a incremental improvement. To the comment ...

More...



elPresidente

4/15/2011 9:59 AM EDT

1 sun is 1000W/m/m as used iin today's solar modules

More...

Solar firm claims efficiency record

Mark Lapedus

4/14/2011 2:20 PM EDT

SAN JOSE, Calif. - Solar Junction, a developer of multi-junction cells for the concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) market, claims to have set a world-record for 43.5 percent efficiency on a commercial-ready production cell.

This achievement was supported under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) PV Incubator Program, managed through DOE’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The cell’s efficiency was confirmed by NREL’s Measurement and Characterization Laboratory.

The 5.5 mm x 5.5 mm production cell tops the current record by 1.2 percent and is higher than the average efficiency gain achieved by previous record holders. The Solar Junction cell measured a peak efficiency of 43.5 percent at greater than 400 suns and still maintained an efficiency as high as 43 percent out to 1,000 suns.

Solar Junction’s cells incorporate the company’s proprietary adjustable spectrum lattice-matched, A-SLAM technology, which enables the company to more optimally partition the solar spectrum for maximum efficiency and greater reliability.

Solar Junction is a manufacturer of high efficiency III-V multi-junction solar cells based on lattice-matched 1eV materials. Founded in 2007, Solar Junction is headquartered in San Jose. Investors include New Enterprise Associates, Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Advanced Technology Ventures. 




PJames

4/14/2011 3:20 PM EDT

Anybody have insight into when multi-junction PV reaches the crossover cost point for solar tower or Sterling dish type systems? 1,000 suns at 43% would be a pretty small amount of semiconductor real estate per W.

Sign in to Reply



mark.lapedus

4/14/2011 4:19 PM EDT

anybody impressed with this or not?

Sign in to Reply



jg_

4/14/2011 10:36 PM EDT

Any advance is good, but they fail to mention many details.
CPV usually needs aggressive cooling to allow the Concentrate part to work, and Tj is not mentioned.
I think they need to extract ~23 watts of head, from something the area of a pencil-rubber.
At 1000x, that's also very focused, not so tolerant of cloud.
Mirrors + Tracking + Cooling, likely dominate the costs, so the 41 or 43% detail is moot.
Since cooling is costly anyway, they could be smarter to look at adding Solar-Thermal into this mix ?

Sign in to Reply



elPresidente

4/15/2011 9:56 AM EDT

No. 5.5mmx5mm is a fingernail clipping. It obviously can't yield anything bigger, or it would be bigger. Call me (I'll be at the rest home, peeing in a bag by then) when it's on a 6 inch wafer and I can focus 400 suns on it. I'll get rid of the heat, give me the 'lectricity...it'll have to be for less than $1 a watt, by the way, kids.

Sign in to Reply



Robotics Developer

4/14/2011 7:13 PM EDT

I might be impressed if I knew what 400 (or 1000) suns means.. First time I have heard of that term.

Sign in to Reply



PJames

4/14/2011 8:02 PM EDT

concentration factor vs normal sun illumination at earths surface, as in a parabolic mirror of 100 cm^3 focused on 1 cm^3 would be 100 suns. Only question is, what is 1 sun... avg over entire earth for a year?

Sign in to Reply



PJames

4/14/2011 8:03 PM EDT

Oops, unit foul... those should obviously be cm^2.

Sign in to Reply



elPresidente

4/15/2011 9:59 AM EDT

1 sun is 1000W/m/m as used iin today's solar modules

Sign in to Reply



ssatish

4/14/2011 9:38 PM EDT

The question is what is the amount of energy required to manufacture these cells? What is the rate of return of energy if we start using these solar cells?

Sign in to Reply



MikeTD

4/15/2011 9:02 AM EDT

If you want to see a real improvement in solar efficiency check out the solar Australian company K2 who in collaboration with Mears technologies have developed a technique for 60% increased efficiency.

Sign in to Reply



Jack.L

4/16/2011 12:10 AM EDT

It is not a matter of impressive but a incremental improvement. To the comment about energy required to manufacture ... almost nill compared to what they collect. The energy to manufacture the rest of a concentrator assembly is way higher. For regular panels, they take about 2 years to recover the energy required to manufacture. For these I expect much less.


To the comment about the number of suns and clouds ... normally these are used for very sunny areas, think desert, but the efficiency does not suddenly drop to 0 below 400 suns, it just drops.

In terms of cooling, most concentrator solar panels use passive cooling. Absolutely you loose efficiency due to higher temps, but still very high overall.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)