News & Analysis

Comment


hm

5/5/2011 12:36 AM EDT

@Rick: Involving USB3 in this new protocl makes SSIC unnecessarily complex. ...

More...



kinnar

5/4/2011 7:55 AM EDT

The world will be eagerly looking for this interface to be standardized as most ...

More...

Spec turns USB3 into chip link

Rick Merritt

5/3/2011 8:00 AM EDT

SAN JOSE, Calif. – Two industry groups are pooling their technologies to define a new high speed, low power chip-to-chip interface for next generation mobile silicon. The USB 3.0 Promoters Group and the MIPI Alliance hope to finish and make available a joint specification early next year.

The so-called Superspeed Inter-Chip spec (SSIC) aims to support physical layer data rates starting at 1.2 to 2.9 Gbits/s and eventually extending up to 5.8 Gbits/s. It also plans a low power mode for data rates between 10 Kbits/s and 600 Mbits/s.

SSIC targets power consumption of about 1-5 picojoules per bit/second, depending on the mode used. In high-speed mode that may amount to an average of about 20 mW.

The effort essentially marries the M-PHY spec, a low power physical layer technology defined by the MIPI Alliance, with the media access controller and higher layer software of the USB 3.0 spec. A working group under the USB 3.0 Promoters Group including members of Intel, ST Ericsson and Texas Instruments started working on the details of the spec about a month ago.

The working group is now deciding what if any parts of the USB 3.0 spec to make optional because they may not be needed in a chip interface. "We wanted to lower the cost of design and time to market by leveraging existing IP—it's about software reuse," said Brian Carlson, vice chair of MIPI and Omap product manager at TI.

SSIC aims to be follow-on of Inter-Chip Connectivity (ICC), a chip interface based on the 480 Mbit/s USB 2.0 spec developed privately by chip designer SMSC (Hauppauge, NY). SMSC started licensing the technology in June and signed up Qualcomm and AMD earlier this year. It makes its spec available free to host chip designers and for a one-time $100,000 fee to peripheral chip designers.

SSIC would be royalty free to all adopter-level members of the MIPI Alliance and the USB 3.0 Promoters group who want to use it in chips for what Carlson described as "mobile terminals with voice capability," including Wi-Fi devices with VoIP features. Vendors could license the technology on a reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) basis for other kinds of chips or systems.

The need is clear. Multiple vendors of applications processors are already designing their own next-generation chip interfaces due to a lack of a standard for the kind of high throughput, low power link they need.

For its part, the MIPI Alliance hopes to establish its M-PHY as a general purpose chip-to-chip interface. It has already specified the technology as the basis for six of its own existing or pending interconnect standards. Jedec has also adopted M-PHY as part of its UFS flash memory interface.





yalanand

5/3/2011 1:17 PM EDT

So now we have competition between Intels thunderbolt and Superspeed Inter-Chip spec (SSIC). Needs to be seen who wins the race.

Sign in to Reply



goafrit

5/3/2011 2:28 PM EDT

Intel will win because they always win via good marketing and legal maneuvers

Sign in to Reply



TXDigital

5/4/2011 12:46 AM EDT

This isn't a race between the two, as they are addressing different applications. Intel is involved in SSIC development too (along with TI, ST-Ericsson and others). SSIC is addressing low-power, chip-to-chip connections for high-speed data such as between next-generation connectivity devices (802.11ac), applications processors and modems.

Sign in to Reply



hm

5/4/2011 1:15 AM EDT

There is need for SSIC. But deriving it from MIPI and USB3 may not be the best approach. They could have done it much better way.

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

5/4/2011 1:58 AM EDT

@hm: What would you suggest?

Sign in to Reply



david.may

5/4/2011 3:48 AM EDT

using a whole 20 mW to get a low 5.8 Gbits/s for a future C2C seems bad today.

not to mention what real use are single data rates between 10 Kbits/s and 600 Mbits/s a general purpose Chip-To-Chip interface in a generic end user device when you already have a Lightpeak speced low power and in prototype to 50Gbit/s in the Intel lab's ready for mass production in this timeline.

you have to question anything SMSC/Hauppauge bring to the table today as they dont have a good track record for providing directly good quality OSS code for their hardware

Sign in to Reply



kinnar

5/4/2011 7:55 AM EDT

The world will be eagerly looking for this interface to be standardized as most of the vendors are using their own way of creating high speed interface, and it is also very good point that it will be royalty free for all the consortium members.

Sign in to Reply



hm

5/5/2011 12:36 AM EDT

@Rick: Involving USB3 in this new protocl makes SSIC unnecessarily complex. Designer will deter employing this. USB3 protocol has differnt appplications. MIPI is good and they can expand further to enhance speed but keep the final design implementation very easy for user just like drag and drop.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Featured Job On
Scroll for More Jobs

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)