News & Analysis

TI’s FRAM MCU signals that fabs are back

Junko Yoshida

5/3/2011 7:01 AM EDT

SAN JOSE, Calif. – Texas Instruments is unveiling today (May 3) a new suite of ultra-low-power ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM) microcontrollers. The company will be demonstrating its development kit here at the Embedded Systems Conference this week.

The announcement signals that chip manufacturing may be making a comeback.

By combining a new low-power memory technology with the company’s already popular, entry-level 16-bit microcontrollers (MSP430 series), TI believes its new FRAM microcontrollers can open the door to a host of “smart” applications that require embedded systems to write data faster, collect more data points and/or retain data in all power modes.

TI claims the new FRAM microcontrollers, dubbed MSP430FR57xxFRAM, “ensures data can be written more than 100 times faster and uses as little as 250 times less power than flash- and EEPROM-based microcontrollers.”


Scott Roller, TI's vice president of microcontroller products

The essence of TI’s new microcontroller lies in its “ultra-low power embedded memory,” said Scott Roller, vice president of microcontroller products at TI, in an interview with EE Times. “If you can drive down the power consumption, new markets will be created. That’s been always our fundamental belief at TI.”

TI’s announcement may also indicate that MCUs are becoming the next battleground for new memory technologies.

Then, there is the process technology angle that is signaling that fabs are back. In an increasingly fabless era, one rarely hears about a microcontroller company saying that process technology differentiates its product from others. TI asserts that its proprietary process technology, jointly developed with FRAM partner Ramtron, enables it to integrate its MCU with an FRAM and other analog options on the same chip.


Fujitsu’s FRAM foray

TI isn’t the only company to embed FRAM into microcontrollers, and its announcement isn’t the first time the industry is hearing about the advantages of FRAM used microcontrollers.

Last fall, Fujitsu Semiconductor America introduced a single-chip, 8-bit MCU featuring embedded FRAM for a variety of general purpose applications, including consumer electronics products, healthcare and industrial systems.

At the time, Fujitsu said “embedding FRAM into an MCU reduces the total footprint and cost, and simplifies system design,” while adding that “the architecture eliminates chip-to-chip interconnects, which significantly improves the transaction speed and internal bus interface between the MCU and memory. This enables performance that Flash or EEPROM cannot provide.”

TI has claimed that its MSP430FR57xx FRAM microcontroller offers “the industry’s lowest power.” Roller said it reduces “the industry’s best active power by up to 50 percent,” when executing code from FRAM, operating at 100µA/MHz in active mode and 3 µA in real-time clock mode.




yalanand

5/3/2011 10:04 AM EDT

Wow 100 times faster and uses as little as 250 times less power than flash is quite an achievement. I am sure this will put lot of pressure on other companies.

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

5/3/2011 2:37 PM EDT

Incredible claims...can anyone verify that information? Kris

Sign in to Reply



Mike G

5/26/2011 7:45 AM EDT

We recently migrated our embedded memory from EEPROM to FRAM and can confirm that write times are basically the same as read times. In our case this means 10ms/256 bytes (EEPROM) to 256us/256 bytes or about 40 times faster. Our clock is not at the maximum speed, so 100 times faster sounds plausible. Power consumption, based on the speed increase alone, will be at least 1/40 of the original EEPROM in our case and could be 1/100 or even better.

Sign in to Reply



parity

5/3/2011 3:57 PM EDT

Kris, link http://www.ti.com/rfid/govid/fram.shtml#2 there is more info on their site

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

5/3/2011 4:03 PM EDT

thank you @parity...would anyone be interested in writing a chapter on the FRAM technology for a memory book I am editing? Kris

Sign in to Reply



Adi B.

5/4/2011 5:30 AM EDT

If you post a contact information I would be able to help!

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

5/4/2011 9:09 AM EDT

Adi: pls email kris.iniewski@gmail.com

Sign in to Reply



hm

5/3/2011 6:05 PM EDT

What are the typical timings for FRAM? And what will be size of FRAM available? Will it help faster migration to USB 3.0 in micro-controllers?

Sign in to Reply



darciop76

5/3/2011 7:05 PM EDT

It's going to be an interesting marriage - a MSP uC with embedded FRAM memory. The article fails to mention one key feature (in my opinion) of a FRAM device: virtualy unlimited write-erase cycles (10^16). Let's wait and see!

Sign in to Reply



DJAus

5/3/2011 8:10 PM EDT

FRAM: Back to the future again.
I started out in computing (showing my age) with magnetic core memory!

Sign in to Reply



Mike G

5/26/2011 7:53 AM EDT

FRAM is not magnetic. It is based on a Ferroelectric principle. However, the competing MRAM is magnetic so, yes, magnetic memory is back.

Sign in to Reply



agk

5/4/2011 9:55 AM EDT

Congrats to TI 's another step up in low power MCU's.F-RAM has 10,000 times greater endurance and 3,000 times less power consumption than a typical serial EEPROM device, and nearly 500 times the write speed. Also since they are faster higher noise immunity the give and the RFID segment needs their low power consumption.More information available at www.ramtron.com.

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

5/26/2011 9:37 AM EDT

thank you @Mike G for independent verification of the TI's claims, sounds very impressive...we are looking for speakers on this technology at emerging technologies meeting (www.cmoset.com), let me know if you know anyone that might be interested, kris.iniewski@gmail.com

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Featured Job On
Scroll for More Jobs

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)