News & Analysis
Comment
DrQuine
It certainly seems surprising that the two cameras are not at opposite ends of ...
selinz
First of all, great idea. I hope this becomes the standard. But why not spread ...
HTC debuts stereo 3-D smartphone
Rick Merritt
6/2/2011 12:35 AM EDT
SAN DIEGO – Taiwan smartphone maker HTC demonstrated here a handset capable of capturing and displaying stereo 3-D images and videos, one of a new crop of glasses-free stereo 3-D handsets some see as pointing the way to the future.
The HTC EVO 3D will be exclusively available on the Sprint WiMax network later this year. Sharp is already selling a similar stereo 3-D handset in Japan, and Korea's LG Electronics showed a prototype unit at Google I/O in San Francisco in May.
Market watcher Displaysearch estimates consumers may buy as many as 195 million stereo 3-D smartphones by 2018, creating a $22 billion market. But some handset makers say the technology is not ready for prime time yet.
HTC showed its 3-D design at the annual Uplinq conference sponsored by Qualcomm, the company that designed the 1.5 GHz dual-core Snapdragon processor that powers it. In a demo, the 3-D images showed depth in front of and behind the display, but were only crisp in a very narrow viewing angle.
Qualcomm specified a dual CMOS sensor module, optimized for delivering the best optical alignment for its chips. The chip designer also developed its own software to automatically convert existing 2-D video into stereo 3-D.
A lack of 3-D capable smartphone displays is one bottleneck to delivering such systems, Qualcomm engineers said. A graphics researcher at handset maker Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications said a lack of good stereo 3-D software is also holding back such designs.
In a keynote address here, Qualcomm chief executive Paul Jacobs showed stereo 3-D games, user-generated content and 3-D movies playing on a smartphone.
In a breakout session, Ville-Veikko Helppi, director of marketing at Rightware Oy, described the company's Kanzi 3-D UI, a PC-based design program for creating stereo 3-D content for Qualcomm's Snapdragon chips. The company licenses autostereoscopic technology from MasterImage 3D.

The HTC EVO 3D WiMax phone for the Sprint network


elPresidente
6/2/2011 1:37 PM EDT
Zelentek have a 3D camera design for handsets that's worth looking at
Sign in to Reply
goafrit
6/2/2011 9:58 PM EDT
Very cool. This company is becoming an innovation powerhouse. Very great effort for 3-D phone
Sign in to Reply
kinnar
6/2/2011 2:17 PM EDT
Does it mean that the present LCDs being used in the Mobile Phones does not support 3D Displaying? I think there must be some mistake as most of the LCD TVs and LED TVs are 3D Display Capable, so the Phone LCDs as well should be able to display 3D Images. The software support might be a bottleneck.
Sign in to Reply
GottaHaveIt
6/2/2011 3:42 PM EDT
These are GLASSES FREE 3D displays.
Sign in to Reply
dnandy
6/2/2011 5:40 PM EDT
True. So you need lenticular displays. Even if you were to consider 3-D with glasses (LCD/LED TV kinds), the display has to be capable to stereoscopy through optical polarization or through sampling images for left and right eyes synchronized to a shutter mechanism on the glasses. A lot more than just software.
Sign in to Reply
chanj
6/2/2011 8:46 PM EDT
3D has a cool factor. The more 3D capturing devices are sold; the better chance a 3DTV will thrive. What would be your considerations to get a 3D ready smartphone?
Sign in to Reply
selinz
6/3/2011 1:22 PM EDT
First of all, great idea. I hope this becomes the standard. But why not spread the two cameras out to more reasonable distance? It would be useful for microscopes and binoculars, as well as giving a more realistic depth perception.
Sign in to Reply
DrQuine
6/5/2011 11:27 AM EDT
It certainly seems surprising that the two cameras are not at opposite ends of the phone to maximize the viewing angle difference. Is this because designers seek to prevent user's hands from blocking a lens as they hold the phone camera? Do I correctly read between the lines that the phone processor is computationally exaggerating the 3D effect from the slight spacing of the camera lenses (and therefore doesn't need a greater separation)?
Sign in to Reply