datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


KB3001

7/14/2011 10:41 AM EDT

Very good point Peter. Semiconductor firms also worry about the precedent any ...

More...



peter.clarke

7/14/2011 5:09 AM EDT

Not the first such allegations.

National Semiconductor at Greenock in ...

More...

Samsung told to pay over cancer deaths

Peter Clarke

6/23/2011 12:07 PM EDT


LONDON – A court in Seoul, South Korea, has ordered that Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. pay compensation to the families of two young employees who died of leukemia, according to the Yonhap news agency. The amount of compensation to be paid was not given in the report.

However, the same court dismissed three other claims – one from the family of dead worker and two from former employees now suffering with lymphoma and leukemia, who had worked at other Samsung manufacturing sites.

Samsung has denied that its production lines increase the likelihood of contracting cancer and refused to accept the court ruling, according to the Yonhap report. A previous state agency investigation had found Samsung was not responsible, the report quoted a Samsung spokesman as saying.

"As the ruling is not final, we will try to clear suspicions through continuing trials," the report quoted spokesman Park Chun-ho as saying.

The judgments come after lobbying groups across Asia came together in 2010 to launch the "Samsung Accountability Campaign" with the claim that they had discovered an unusual cluster of cancers amongst Samsung fab workers.

The Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of the families of two workers who worked cleaning wafers on a production line in Gyeonggi Province. The families had requested the court annul a 2009 decision by the Korea Workers' Compensation & Welfare Services not to pay compensation and funeral expenses for the deaths, the report said.




Sanjib.Acharya

6/24/2011 11:52 PM EDT

This is a very sensitive issue. I don't know based on what kind of investigation the court passed the order. Samsung should take this seriously and if they don't agree with court's judgment, they should at least propose for an independent authority to investigate if there are any health & safety hazard that might exist at their manufacturing setup. If the issues are found, then they should correct it and pay for it. My sympathy goes with the family of those deceased employees.

Sign in to Reply



elctrnx_lyf

6/25/2011 3:26 AM EDT

Samsung should sincerely go back and investigate the real issue and correct it. The companies should take care of their employees.

Sign in to Reply



prabhakar_deosthali

6/26/2011 6:09 AM EDT

There are so many Fabs in existence for years and this looks to be the first of its kind of allegations on the working environment of a fab such as to cause cancer like deadly disease. An independent survey is needed to find out if such possibility exists at all these fabs around the world. This will help these fabs in avoiding such dangers to their employees in future.

Sign in to Reply



peter.clarke

7/14/2011 5:09 AM EDT

Not the first such allegations.

National Semiconductor at Greenock in Scotland was subject of similar allegations but no study or court found that National Semiconductor had done wrong.

There was a groundwater contamination case in Silicon Valley dating back to the 1970s and early 1980s and a separate long-running legal battle between some workers and IBM.

Sign in to Reply



Sheetal.Pandey

6/26/2011 10:20 PM EDT

If there is an issue like this, it would be in the interest of Samsung to find root causes, address it honestly and solve it. After all they should not remain in the market for wrong reasons and even if 10% of this is true no one would willingly want to work in those facilities.

Sign in to Reply



goafrit

6/26/2011 10:39 PM EDT

Too bad, these things keep happening.

Sign in to Reply



goafrit

6/26/2011 10:41 PM EDT

I think they need an external panel of experts to help them get to the root of this problem. Otherwise, there will be a repeat case. The money is not the solution, the prevention is what matters.

Sign in to Reply



agk

6/27/2011 9:48 AM EDT

Both the employer and employee are careless. Any disease due to environment will not strike at once. It gives lot of symptoms. These symptoms to be monitored by themselves and the employer for those who work in the hazardous places. Because life is only one for every human.

Sign in to Reply



peter.clarke

6/27/2011 10:16 AM EDT

Finding or disproving an underlying problem may not be easy.

If the work flow, physical layout, equipment and chemicals in use have all been changed since the unfortunate deaths of Hwang and Lee then investigations start to depend on hearsay and records which may be incomplete or inaccurate.

Sign in to Reply



KB3001

7/14/2011 10:41 AM EDT

Very good point Peter. Semiconductor firms also worry about the precedent any such ruling could set especially in countries where common law applies. Tricky issue indeed....

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)