News & Analysis
Comment
DrQuine
With reports of quantum leaps in battery technology, the legacy manufacturers ...
selinz
Nice win for Nanosys.
Nanosys grabs DoE battery development grant
George Leopold
8/11/2011 2:45 PM EDT
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Energy Department continues to push materials development for batteries destined for use in next-generation electric vehicles.
Nanosys Inc. (Palo Alto, Calif.) said Thursday (Aug. 11) it has been awarded a $4.8 million grant from DoE to scale up its proprietary battery material for the electric vehicle market. The initiative will eventually include an additional $6 million in matching funds from Nanosys and federal "sub-awards."
The EV battery program is part of an Energy Department effort to reduce the cost of lithium-ion batteries to $250 per kilowatt hour, which is widely viewed as a milestone for commercial acceptance. The U.S. program also seeks to boost next-generation EV battery capacity to 300 miles per charge.
Nanosys claims that recent tests revealed that its propriety anode material, dubbed SiNanode, doubled in capacity of Li-ion batteries while boosting the number of charging cycles.
"Until [electric] vehicles are able to achieve substantial operating range on a single charge with the economics of combustion vehicles, acceptance will be limited to early adopters," Jason Hartlove, president and CEO of Nanosys, said in a statement.
DoE's Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy is investing billions of dollars on advanced battery research as it seeks to jumpstart a next-generation EV industry in the U.S.
Navigate to related information



selinz
8/11/2011 5:26 PM EDT
Nice win for Nanosys.
Sign in to Reply
DrQuine
8/16/2011 10:22 AM EDT
With reports of quantum leaps in battery technology, the legacy manufacturers would seem to be at risk of being displaced. I hope it will be possible for the new technologies to be licensed and manufactured in existing factories. Otherwise there will be a lot of nonproductive capital burning churn in the industry.
Sign in to Reply