News & Analysis
Comment
seaEE
A wireless 3D printer that manufacturers whatever you search for on the ...
selinz
Google Mkt cap 230B, mickie D's 89B. You got it reversed... Don't think Google ...
Google to buy Motorola Mobility for $12.5B
Dylan McGrath
8/15/2011 12:37 PM EDT
Possible bidding war?
Paul McWilliams, editor of technology investment newsletter Next Inning Technology Research, said that another company—perhaps Microsoft—might enter the fray and top Google's bid for Motorola Mobility.
"I think there is a reasonable enough chance we'll see someone else come in with a counteroffer if for no other reason but to force Google to dig a little deeper," McWilliams wrote in a report to subscribers Monday. "As I see it, Google can clearly leverage Motorola Mobility from many perspectives, and the armor of Motorola Mobility's patent portfolio is nearly a must-have."
McWilliams said Google's move might also spur Microsoft to acquire Nokia Corp., the world's largest handset maker.
Billionaire financier Carl Ichan, a large Motorola shareholder who last month publicly urged Motorola Mobility to explore options for selling its patent portfolio in the wake of the Nortel patent auction, issued a statement Monday applauding the Google deal.
"This is a great outcome for all shareholders of Motorola Mobility, especially in light of today's markets," Icahn said.
In a separate statement, Sanjay Jha, CEO of Motorola Mobility, said, "This transaction offers significant value for Motorola Mobility’s stockholders and provides compelling new opportunities for our employees, customers, and partners around the world."
Google and Motorola Mobility's' boards have already unanimously approved the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals in the U.S., the European Union and other jurisdictions, and the approval of Motorola Mobility’s stockholders, Google said. The transaction is expected to close by the end of 2011 or early 2012, Google said.
- George Leopold and Nic Mokhoff contributed to this report from Washington D.C. and Manhassett, N.Y., respectively.
Paul McWilliams, editor of technology investment newsletter Next Inning Technology Research, said that another company—perhaps Microsoft—might enter the fray and top Google's bid for Motorola Mobility.
"I think there is a reasonable enough chance we'll see someone else come in with a counteroffer if for no other reason but to force Google to dig a little deeper," McWilliams wrote in a report to subscribers Monday. "As I see it, Google can clearly leverage Motorola Mobility from many perspectives, and the armor of Motorola Mobility's patent portfolio is nearly a must-have."
McWilliams said Google's move might also spur Microsoft to acquire Nokia Corp., the world's largest handset maker.
Billionaire financier Carl Ichan, a large Motorola shareholder who last month publicly urged Motorola Mobility to explore options for selling its patent portfolio in the wake of the Nortel patent auction, issued a statement Monday applauding the Google deal.
"This is a great outcome for all shareholders of Motorola Mobility, especially in light of today's markets," Icahn said.
In a separate statement, Sanjay Jha, CEO of Motorola Mobility, said, "This transaction offers significant value for Motorola Mobility’s stockholders and provides compelling new opportunities for our employees, customers, and partners around the world."
Google and Motorola Mobility's' boards have already unanimously approved the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals in the U.S., the European Union and other jurisdictions, and the approval of Motorola Mobility’s stockholders, Google said. The transaction is expected to close by the end of 2011 or early 2012, Google said.
- George Leopold and Nic Mokhoff contributed to this report from Washington D.C. and Manhassett, N.Y., respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
Navigate to related information
chanj
8/15/2011 1:11 PM EDT
The acquisition seems to be good to Android and Google. What would be the impact to the other Android phone vendors?
Sign in to Reply
goafrit
8/15/2011 9:51 PM EDT
It is bad because Google is now the judge and plaintiff but it is also good because Android is saved from lawyers
Sign in to Reply
hm
8/15/2011 1:26 PM EDT
If Goolge/Motorola Mobile compete with LG/Samsung/Sony and others in handset market, why these vendors go for Android? They may like to switch over to Windows or may be other. Anodroid may be called open but now other vendor will have mistrust.
Sign in to Reply
hm
8/15/2011 1:28 PM EDT
RIM and Nokia may also be this precarious situation. RIM may be target for Apple and Nokia for Microsoft.
Sign in to Reply
Momzo17
8/15/2011 2:07 PM EDT
Why would the Google+Motorola partnership be a problem for Phone Makers like Samsung or LG? They've been getting Android from Google for Free. So I don't see why they will quit on Android for Microsoft, knowing that the latter won't offer the OS for free. With RIM's market share on a free fall, they could possibly be targeted by Apple. But I don't think Apple has any interests in acquiring RIM.
Sign in to Reply
KB3001
8/15/2011 2:37 PM EDT
I do not think Apple has an interest in RIM either. Wrt Android phones, however, you are assuming things will remain as they are which I doubt will be the case. If Google are becoming a mobile phone provider, they would have an unfair competitive advantage over other Android phones' providers, which will make the latter think hard about their commitment to Android as a SW platform of choice. I do not think Google will continue to supply their competitors with the same quality of software they are using in their phones anyway. The whole thing is akin to Microsoft's unfair competitive advantage in Windows applications (Office, VS, Explorer etc.) given they make the Windows OS. What would the regulators do? I think this acquisition would be a step backwards for the community...
Sign in to Reply
p_g
8/15/2011 5:18 PM EDT
The main reason for Android to be as popular as Apple is volume. If they don't provide same quality outside they will loose market edge.
I have feeling that having local Hardware group, they will be able to optimize software and hardware more optimally. And same solution can be opted by other manufacturers. I don't thing Google want to compete against other cell phone makers, just trying to optimize and improve their software.
Sign in to Reply
pixies
8/18/2011 4:32 PM EDT
I think Google is aiming for the IP and talents, not the actual brands.
Sign in to Reply
hm
8/15/2011 3:18 PM EDT
Apple's main interest for RIM will only be its IP/patents. Apple may not be interested in RIM products or manpower. Also, Apple may not like these pool of RIM patents to fall in some otherhand.
Sign in to Reply
nosubject
8/15/2011 3:36 PM EDT
It is interesting that Google spent such big chunk of money to play defense in this game.
Sign in to Reply
Momzo17
8/15/2011 4:14 PM EDT
Was this deal thought of and done overnight? I don't think so. Google and its advisers certainly considered the pros and cons of such a deal, and the prospect of buying Motorola has perhaps been on Larry Page's mind for quite some time. Now Google can use Moto's patent portfolio to play a better defense, but also an excellent offense. Handset makers like Samsung, HTC and LG will redirect their focus towards Microsoft if the latter can provide an OS better than Android. And until I see it, I don't think Microsoft can come up with something that will give Android a run for its money.
Sign in to Reply
terion
8/15/2011 4:22 PM EDT
Isn't it sad that $12.5B is spend not for sake of innovation or new business opportunity, but just to defend against swarms of IP lawyers?
What is ratio of spendings on engineering vs lawyers in todays world? I guess it is diving and it is not customers who will benefit.
Sign in to Reply
Frank Eory
8/15/2011 4:22 PM EDT
Google says Android will remain open, but one must wonder how effective that openness will be when Google is able to provide the latest "pure" form of Android on its own hardware platform before releasing it to other Android partners. Google could very well make Android a closed ecosystem, just like Apple has with iOS, if it chose to do so.
Another interesting aspect of this deal is that Google will also be acquiring Motorola's broadband and cable TV equipment businesses, which represent nearly 2/3 of the cable TV/broadband infrastructure and cable set-top box market in the U.S.
This could have major implications for Google TV.
Sign in to Reply
p_g
8/15/2011 5:20 PM EDT
@Frank, I also think its little to do with cell phone but more for TV business. However the cell phone business is getting highlighted since Motorola is big in it.
Sign in to Reply
Frank Eory
8/15/2011 7:49 PM EDT
We can only speculate as to how important the broadband cable play was in this decision, but I for one would love to see what Google could do with the stodgy old cable box -- which still, after all these years, has abysmal search capabilities.
Rather than making Google TV a second box for over-the-top video, imagine if Google TV simply was THE box...the only box, and powered by Google software.
Sign in to Reply
CamilleK
8/15/2011 8:09 PM EDT
@Frank: I just read and noticed I put a similar comment in the other article about Google/Android OEMS... I think we are on to something :-)
Sign in to Reply
KB3001
8/15/2011 5:35 PM EDT
@terion, it is sad indeed, that's why I said it's a step backwards for the community. I am sure Google have their reasons for buying Motorola (the patent issue is the most convincing) but I personally do not trust Android to be an open platform in a few years time. I might be wrong but my confidence in Android has taken a dent! This is a gift to Microsoft.
Sign in to Reply
altos ace
8/15/2011 8:37 PM EDT
@terion & @KB3001: Sad indeed, but this looks to be a defensive move by Google. Really, Google has little choice. I think it is a very smart move on the part of Google, in difussing the large number of patent lawsuits against them.
2. The price appears to be 'fair'. Consider Nortel's 6000 patents were sold for $4.5B, or $750K per patent. Google is paying $12.5B/21300 or less than $600K per patent. Now this 21300 includes 6700 in filing. If one wants to be conservative, and assume roughly half of them will be granted, and use 18000 patents equivalent, $12.5B/18000 = $700K. About the same for Nortel. (Things are getting more interesting if you dig deeper into the numbers. Of the 6000 Nortel patents, only 2000 are considered to be in good standing. So how many of those 21300 patents are in good standing?)
3. If we break down the MMI into assets pools, there are three piles: IP, Handsets and Video. Handset lately has been a money losing business, and there is no end in sight. Video is an intriguing component, but to me is an icing on the cake in the grand scheme.
4. Looks to me there is synergy between Google TV and the Youtube with the MMI's video. That is a keeper, I think. However, the handset is a totally different business, with rapid product cycle, razor thin margin (i.e for non-iphone), huge coordinate/management issue in supply chain and sales channel, I think it is better off for Google to spin off or sell it to another company.
5. I am less pessimistic than KB3001 in whether Android will continue to be an open platform. I think it will be. I think Google will make it a level-playing field. Not only that, if it can be done, I think Google will lend its patent shield to other Android licensee such as HTC and Samsung. I am assuming Google is playing the hand right. Of course, it will be even more convincing if Google decides to spin off the handset business.
Sign in to Reply
eewiz
8/15/2011 9:38 PM EDT
@altos ace
In MMI's case there is a functioning business also being sold apart from the patents. So you cant say its a fair price as Nortel sold only patents.
Moto will be really hopping for a bidding war. I feel MS will be willing to fork up even 20B to keep Google from getting the patents.
Sign in to Reply
selinz
8/16/2011 11:29 AM EDT
Moto wins, Google wins, and I believe that the consumer wins. Now if Google can use some of their clout to revive some US Moto factories... OK, that's wishful thinking..
Sign in to Reply
VictorT
8/17/2011 6:12 AM EDT
does it have any impact on arm-intel war?
Sign in to Reply
green_is_now
8/17/2011 12:01 PM EDT
Patents are corperate hammers.
The one with the most hammers wins.
Sign in to Reply
green_is_now
8/17/2011 12:04 PM EDT
assume the patents cost 30% premuim
Synergy has to produce another 26% to make this worth it.
+ the abbility to raise hammers to apples capacitive touch patents (better than gold!)
Sign in to Reply
Dean112
11/18/2011 10:58 AM EST
I think McDonalds should Google and we can all get free Big Macs with every phone thats got Android on it. Whos in?!
Sign in to Reply
Dean112
11/18/2011 10:58 AM EST
Should buy Google that is**
Sign in to Reply
selinz
8/15/2012 8:11 PM EDT
Google Mkt cap 230B, mickie D's 89B. You got it reversed... Don't think Google would consider McDonalds consistent with their company image.
Sign in to Reply
seaEE
8/15/2012 9:50 PM EDT
A wireless 3D printer that manufacturers whatever you search for on the McDonalds menu? Hmmm....
Sign in to Reply