datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


seaEE

10/1/2011 3:07 PM EDT

There also use to be the joke that HP stood for "High Price". But everyone also ...

More...



resistion

10/1/2011 1:34 PM EDT

A high-turnover board leading to the selection of yet another non-tech CEO does ...

More...

HP keeps strategy, names Whitman CEO

Rick Merritt

9/22/2011 6:31 PM EDT

SAN JOSE – Hewlett-Packard named Meg Whitman its new chief executive, reaffirming strategic decisions made under former CEO Leo Apotheker but seeking a new leader to execute on them.

Ray Lane, named executive chairman of the HP board, defended both Whitman as the best pick for the job and the current HP board which has been widely criticized. HP also will seek a new lead independent board director.

Both Whitman and Lane said they continue to support decisions Apotheker announced August 18 to consider spinning out the PC business, to discontinue the WebOS tablet and smartphone business and to acquire server software Autonomy for an estimated $11.7 billion.

Whitman said the HP board is still evaluating whether to spin out its PC division and will decide before the end of the year. The Autonomy deal should also close by year's end, she said.

"In the end the only thing to rebuild confidence in this company is to deliver results and that is what I intend to do," said Whitman.

Lane said the board removed Apotheker for a lack of teamwork, a series of poor quarterly financial results and poor communications of strategic goals. He also defended the board against charges by Wall Street analysts it acted in haste given Apotheker's tenure of less than a year.

Lane declined to give a timeline for the board's action, but described it in broad terms.

"It wasn’t last week, it wasn’t a month ago," he said. "You don’t deliver a quarter and don’t deliver another quarter and then make some announcements [August 18] that are communicated poorly--how long do you go along with that?" he asked.

In addition to CEO candidates from last year's search which landed Apotheker, "there were several [internal] names we considered, but some were not ready," said Lane "I looked at an interim role, as did other board members, but I knew from the beginning that the strongest candidate was Meg.

"She is decisive and a people person," Lane said. "I predict HP employees will get on her side because she is going to get on their side really quickly," he added.

Lane also defended the board against widespread criticism for how it has handled a strong of issues with recent CEOs including Mark Hurd and Carly Fiorina. One reported said the board hired Apotheker last year although most of its members had not met him.

"I'm really proud of this board, I am proud of the individuals on this board and they way they work together," said Lane. "It is our operating execution that needs to improve and we made a decision in meg Whitman to lead us to that performance," he said.

"It's open season to write about this board, but this is not the board that was around for pre-texting and that fired Mark Hurd," he said, noting the HP board added eight new members in this year, including Whitman.

"This board did not select Leo, more than half this board is new since Leo," Lane said.  "This is a board that objectively debated whether he was the right person to run this business and we chose someone who has a track record of leadership," he said.

"I can't think of a name I would select outside Meg to lead this company," he added.

Whitman pledged to drive a decision on HP's PC business soon.

"The best thing we can do is get to a decision on PCs as fast as we can," she said. "It's not like fine wine and does not get better with time," she quipped.

"The vast majority of this company is still in the hardware business, and I want to make sure we underscore our commit to the hardware business," she added.

"If [the PC business] cannot be stronger on the outside to deliver better equipment and technology, it stays inside—the same is true of [its position for] investors," added Lane.

Krista Macomber, a research analyst at Technology Business Research, Inc. said HP should retain the PC business. "The synergies between PCs and the rest of HP’s business are positive, giving the company greater scale and allowing it to leverage its sales forces and partnership ecosystem," she said in a report.

Whitman said she has already met with top HP executives, but not rank-and-file employees. "The employees want to be led, this organization has been through a lot and they want very much for this company that is an icon in Silicon Valley to succeed," she said.





Frank Eory

9/22/2011 7:59 PM EDT

Hopefully with this choice of Meg Whitman, the revolving door of HP CEOs will stay still for awhile.

One thing she clearly understands is the urgency of deciding yes or no on keeping the PC business. I love the comment "It's not like fine wine and does not get better with time." In fact, it's more like a gallon of milk that got its expiration date stamped on it the day Leo made his announcement about spinning out the PC biz -- a little more sour and a little closer to worthless with each passing day.

Sign in to Reply



seaEE

9/23/2011 12:27 AM EDT

It will be interesting to observe the changes in structure and strategy that occur in the next 11 months.

Sign in to Reply



AlunWang

9/23/2011 1:00 AM EDT

I think it is hard for Meg to restore the declining trend of HP, as HP is now a staggering monster.

Sign in to Reply



selinz

9/23/2011 2:40 AM EDT

Does this mean that we aren't getting our $99 touchpads? ;-)

Sign in to Reply



Traces

9/23/2011 7:22 AM EDT

I guess I'm old school -- I remember when HP was a technical innovator, and am sad to see it go this way. I'm not sure if hiring Carly II at this point is hastening death, or just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

Sign in to Reply



nicolas.mokhoff

9/23/2011 10:14 AM EDT

Patience has its rewards. It may be unfair to label Whitman CarlyII simply because she is a strong woman executive. I will give Whitman till the end of the year to get the H-P house moving in a positive direction where perceptions are bound to change about her abilities. At the same time I'm no apologist for Whitman; just looking to give a fair shot at her leading the company I have admired since my technical school days. It was an engineer's engineering company and from what I see it still is.

Sign in to Reply



Traces

9/23/2011 5:28 PM EDT

You're entirely missing the point -- the similarity isn't gender, it's a willful ignorance of technical culture. Carly was called "the Anti-Steve Jobs" by Infoworld by being able to alienate engineers within seconds of meeting. Ms. Whitman can aspire to such heights if she puts her toothpaste experience on the shelf and stops pushing people around, but I doubt any higher.

Sign in to Reply



nicolas.mokhoff

9/23/2011 6:48 PM EDT

A little fast to judge, no? I'm willing to give her a chance to show herself as a CEO, not by her knowledge of an engineering culture. If she ain't got what it takes, we will soon know about it.

Sign in to Reply



Wnderer

9/23/2011 12:25 PM EDT


HP is now Agilent
Compaq is now HP

Sign in to Reply



markhahn

9/23/2011 3:38 PM EDT

I wonder whether HP most needs help in knowing what its past mistakes were, so it can learn from them.

For instance, the web-pad fiasco - why did HP think it could price the device at parity with iPad? it shows a lack of understanding the market, of why people pay a premium for Apple products, etc.

Another example is HP policies in the IT world - take pricing of disks as a random example. We all know how much (little!) a 1TB 7200 RPM 3.5" SATA disk costs, so HP needs to display a bit of humility in not marking it up by a factor of 4x.

HP product lines are absurdly ramified and complex. Even just rackmount x86 servers are practically impossible to navigate without serious, sit-down study. That kind of make-it-because-we-can doesn't leave any corporate energy to purse more interesting products that might lead to future growth, rather than just carpet-bombing the same highly-competitive boring-server market.

Here's another example: imagine that HP servers used standard (ATX/SSI/etc) motherboards. would this help? a full-custom server lets you tweak each cable run, but how much actual advantage does that provide, versus leveraging the mass market? Imagine if HP could produce a line of motherboards that were actually more attractive (faster, more robust, etc) than commodity vendors. or an LCD panel that wasn't just a clone of the same thing from Dell/Apple/etc. A disk drive packaged with 4G of flash used as a cache. A bomb-proof, triple-redundant enterprise server that could timeshare 10,000 simultaneous x86 VM sessions.

Sign in to Reply



Some Guy

9/23/2011 6:51 PM EDT

Meg 2010, A new California, $144M.
Meg 2011, A new HP ... Priceless.

Sign in to Reply



giuann

9/23/2011 10:03 PM EDT

One time I bought HP calculators and HP computers because of HP oscilloscope.
HP was synonymous of high quality and excellent engineering.
If they were making instruments they could have said 'our tablets have the same quality of these instrument'.

Sign in to Reply



seaEE

10/1/2011 3:07 PM EDT

There also use to be the joke that HP stood for "High Price". But everyone also understood that you were getting a reliable product of good quality. My HP calculator still works, and its corresponding manual is one of the few manuals I have read from cover to cover.

Sign in to Reply



Frank Eory

9/25/2011 6:21 PM EDT

I don't want to speak out of turn here, but how many CEO's are actually worth 10's of millions of dollars per year? Some of them just seem to drain X times their salary from the bottom line, while contributing almost nothing of value. Others definitely contribute value to the company and the stockholders, but how exactly is that value determined?

I'm just wondering, because lately I've been thinking about all the 10's of millions of dollars that have left American corporations into the pockets of CEOs who might as well not even have shown up to work. In fact, for some of them, not showing up to work would've been by far the best thing they could've done for their shareholders, customers and employees.

Sign in to Reply



resistion

10/1/2011 1:34 PM EDT

A high-turnover board leading to the selection of yet another non-tech CEO does not bode well for HP.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)