News & Analysis
Comment
Oscar Law
docdivakar
I agree... secondly one must realize that 3D IC design is also a packaging ...
Perfecting the 3-D chip
R Colin Johnson
10/11/2011 10:31 AM EDT
You’ve heard the hype: The foundation of semiconductor fabrication will be transformed over the next few years as multistory structures rise up from dice that today are planar. After almost a decade of major semiconductor engineering efforts worldwide aimed at making the structures manufacturable, three-dimensional ICs are poised for commercialization starting next year—several years behind schedule.
Chip makers have spent the past several years perfecting the through-silicon vias that will interconnect 3-D ICs. Now that TSVs have been honed for 2-D tasks, such as transferring data from the front side of a planar chip to bumps on the flip side, the stage is set for 3-D ICs using stacked dice.
Last winter’s International Solid-State Circuits Conference featured “almost-3-D” chips, such as Samsung’s much-publicized 1-Gbit mobile DRAM (with a planned ramp to 4 Gbits by 2013). Samsung’s 2.5-D technique mates stacked DRAM dice with TSVs and microbumps atop a system-in-package.

Samsung announced this wide-I/O 1-Gbit DRAM for smartphones and tablets at this year's ISSCC. The device uses 3-D TSVs mated to microbumps.
SOURCE: Samsung
Click on image to enlarge.
A second major 2.5-D success is expected this fall, when Xilinx promises to deliver a multi-FPGA solution using a packaging process that interconnects four side-by-side Virtex-7 FPGAs with microbumps on a silicon interposer. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. is making the silicon interposer, which redistributes the FPGAs’ interconnections using TSVs that mate to copper balls on a substrate package using a controlled-collapse chip connection (C4). TSMC promises to make its seminal 2.5-D-to-3-D transition technology available to its other foundry customers next year.

Xilinx uses TSVs combined with controlled-collapse chip connection solder bumps to mount four FPGAs on a TSMC-made silicon interposer. SOURCE: Xilinx
Click on image to enlarge.
The surprise 3-D IC announcement for 2011, however, comes from IBM, which recently confided that it was already secretly mass-producing full-fledged 3-D ICs on high-volume mobile consumer devices, albeit using low-density TSVs. As a result of the experience it has gained, IBM now claims to have identified the remaining engineering hurdles to 3-D and says it expects to surmount them in 2012.
“The era of the one-trick pony is gone,” said Bernard Meyerson, vice president of research at IBM (Armonk, N.Y.). “You are not going to win the 3-D performance battle if you rely solely on materials, or chip architecture, or networking, or software and integration. To win at 3-D, you need to use all these resources together at the most holistic level possible.”
Last month, IBM announced it had approached 3M about creating a designer material—akin to asking for “a really tall short person,” as Meyerson described it—that would solve the last remaining engineering hurdle to 3-D ICs: overheating. 3M’s job is to create an underfill material that fits between stacked dice and is an electrical insulator (like a dielectric) but is more thermally conductive than silicon (like a metal). 3M promises to have its miracle material ready for commercialization in two years.
“Right now we have trials ongoing, and by 2013 we want to have a formula in place that is ready for widespread commercialization,” said Ming Cheng, technical director of 3M’s Electronics Markets Materials Division (see sidebar, last page).
Some analysts are not convinced the IBM-3M joint development effort will necessarily put the pair ahead in 3-D ICs.
“3M is making an underfill material that will address the thermal issues for 3-D stacking,” said Françoise von Trapp, principal analyst for advanced packaging technologies at the MEMS Investor Journal. “While that’s definitely one of the remaining limitations needing to be addressed before 3-D ICs go to volume production, I don’t think anyone believes it’s the final key to unlocking the remaining issues for 3-D stacks.”
Next: 3-D everywhere


wbayer
10/11/2011 2:23 PM EDT
FYI, the Silicon Integration Initiative (Si2) also has a 3D standards effort under way, and is cooperating with the other entities listed in this excellent article to be sure there is no overlap.
For more info http://www.si2.org/?page=1380
Sign in to Reply
resistion
10/11/2011 6:48 PM EDT
The serial nature of stacking and the vertical thermal proximity are fundamental concerns.
Sign in to Reply
hm
10/11/2011 7:04 PM EDT
Long term reliability of these parts is also of concern. There has to be new testing methodology.
Sign in to Reply
Astronut
10/12/2011 12:19 PM EDT
hm: You're right! Although 3D itself shouldn't affect lifetime (none of our 3D-ICs from 2004 have failed yet), when more circuitry is added the mean time between failures is likely to become unacceptably small. Continual on-chip testing may be the answer.
Sign in to Reply
resistion
10/12/2011 2:30 PM EDT
Hope that can remain an option not become a specific requirement. :)
Sign in to Reply
chipmonk
10/12/2011 1:11 PM EDT
An excellent overview of current 3D status and roadmap except for the glaring omission of Allvia - a small foundry located right here in Si Valley that has pioneered TSV technology at a prototype level for the last 5-6 years and provides smaller customers access to this technology. They also have Si Interposers with integrated capacitors.
Sign in to Reply
JoeData
10/12/2011 1:49 PM EDT
Sounds like a perfect use for industrial diamonds - underfill material!
Sign in to Reply
chipmonk
10/13/2011 3:17 PM EDT
vapor deposition is being tried but cost remains an issue
Sign in to Reply
elctrnx_lyf
10/12/2011 2:19 PM EDT
will this technology be complete future in the next few years to much higher density processors on a single chip.
Sign in to Reply
resistion
10/12/2011 2:32 PM EDT
One also mustn't lose sight of 3d interconnect taking up more and more area especially with more and more stacked dies.
Sign in to Reply
chipmonk
10/13/2011 3:28 PM EDT
yes, the TSVs will take up about 15 - 20 % space on a die ( including the bond pads & keep-outs to isolate transistors from stress induced by the TSVs ) but this would be a wash since no large bond pads would be required for wire bonds any more. Because of the short I/O length ( low loss ) and high I/O density possible, TSVs will enable a lot of high - perf / low - power / compact designs.
Sign in to Reply
Astronut
10/13/2011 3:42 PM EDT
resiston: Many of the 3D interconnects won't go through the whole stack, just 1 or 2 layers. Only the signals to the outside world need to emerge at the surface.
Sign in to Reply
Rchandta1
10/12/2011 8:04 PM EDT
.."volume commercialization of heterogeneous stacks of processor, memory, mixed-signal, networking and I/O chips formed into silicon skyscrapers as high as 100 chips per stack .." - this is very ambitious goal!!
Generally sounds reasonable, but very skeptical of the idea of liquid cooling. May fine for special application but definitely not for commercial.
Sign in to Reply
ATUL SRIVASTAVA
10/13/2011 2:32 AM EDT
This will obviously need new generation of EDA tools too . What is the status on that front ?
Sign in to Reply
pinhead
10/13/2011 1:19 PM EDT
Good question. I was working for one of the cutting edge 3D companies a year ago, and at that point, the EDA was more or less non existent. It was just hacking things together manually.
Sign in to Reply
Astronut
10/13/2011 3:47 PM EDT
ATUL: Micro Magic, Magma, and R3Logic all have 3D-aware EDA tools; but there are still some gaps in the 3D toolset.
Sign in to Reply
docdivakar
10/13/2011 7:30 PM EDT
I agree... secondly one must realize that 3D IC design is also a packaging exercise so that needs to be addressed concurrently. Otherwise, there will be costly repititions and try outs of what is manufacturable.
MP Divakar
Sign in to Reply
collin
10/13/2011 11:51 AM EDT
I think TI is also developing 3-D IC now. If we have 3-D IC, does it mean that we could see 3-D video on TV, website,mobile phone,tablet,and all other devices which have display terminal?
Sign in to Reply
Astronut
10/13/2011 3:48 PM EDT
collin: 3-D video is a very different thing from 3D-ICs. 3D-IC refers to a way of designing and manufacturing chips; 3-D video is an application. No relation.
Sign in to Reply
docdivakar
10/13/2011 7:27 PM EDT
@Colin Johnson: other entities involved in 3D IC standardization is GSA which has been meeting 4 to 6 times a year on this topic, and Si2 Consortium.
IBM's work in 3D IC by stacking is nothing new, definitely not a secret. At CANDE 2010 and also at GSA 3D Standards meeting earlier this year, there were presentations by IBM folks so I am not at all surprised. What surprises me is 3M taking on the challenge to develop a thermal interface material with high conductivity for gaps less than 1um.
My earlier posting on 3D-related article is here:
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4215464/Si2-to-form-3-D-IC-standards-group?cid=NL_EETimesDaily
MP Divakar
Sign in to Reply
Oscar Law
10/17/2011 9:08 PM EDT
I think that there are still few challenges for 3D IC design:
- How can we test all IC before they are stacked together?
- Most of current 3D IC is limited to memory or sensor only, it takes time to develop complete strategy for stacking real ASIC together
- Wafer handling and KGD becomes nightmare for product engineer
- How can we handle thermal issues?
- 3M approaches may be good solution and we shall see how to apply this for production. However, I don't prefer liquid cooling solution, it is too complicated for implementation
- New 3D chip architecture related with TSV placement will solve the problem with lower cost
- Is new 3D IC EDA tools required or not?
- I prefer hybrid 3D IC design flow, it re-uses most of current ASIC flow with minor modification, it not only reduces the cost but also shortens the design cycle. For example, the multiple die physical verification time can be reduced by 10X or more through minor changes in current flow.
Sign in to Reply