datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


Oscar Law

10/17/2011 9:08 PM EDT

I think that there are still few challenges for 3D IC design:
- How can we ...

More...



docdivakar

10/13/2011 7:30 PM EDT

I agree... secondly one must realize that 3D IC design is also a packaging ...

More...

Perfecting the 3-D chip

R Colin Johnson

10/11/2011 10:31 AM EDT

3-D everywhere

Even IBM’s claimed lead in 3-D IC production is not without its challengers. In fact, Tezzaron Semiconductor (Naperville, Ill.) has been offering 3-D IC design services for its tungsten TSV process for several years. Tezzaron’s FaStack process can create 3-D chips from heterogeneous dice on wafers as thin as 12 microns. It features wide I/O for stacked DRAMs with submicron interconnections as dense as 1 million TSVs per square millimeter.

 

Serial entrepreneur Zvi Or-Bach, a past winner of an EE Times ACE Award for Innovator of the Year, argues that 3-D IC designers need to move beyond TSVs to ultrahigh-density monolithic 3-D. That’s not a surprising view for Or-Bach, whose latest role is president and CEO of IP developer MonolithIC 3D Inc. (San Jose, Calif.). Startups like BeSang Inc. (Beaverton, Ore.) claim to be fabricating prototypes of TSV-free monolithic 3-D memory chips that could debut in 2012.

 

The state of the art today, however, is 3-D chip stacking using TSVs, and every major semiconductor company is working on the technology. “IBM is pushing the envelope, thinking beyond the current frame of things by partnering with 3M. However, every advance made by IBM in 3-D will unleash the creativity in competitors like Samsung, Intel and TSMC, all of which have independent development efforts under way for 3-D ICs,” said market watcher Richard Doherty, director of The Envisioneering Group (Seaford, N.Y.).

 

The techniques for making 3-D ICs are not new; rather, the current efforts focus on refining them. For instance, many CMOS imagers today use TSVs to bring pixel data from the front to the rear side of their substrate, and the idea of stacking chips itself dates back to early patents issued to transistor pioneer William Shockley circa 1958. Since then, many stacked-die configurations have been used—such as stacking a MEMS sensor atop an ASIC, or a small DRAM atop a processor core—but usually using wirebonding for interconnection.

 

Moving from wirebonds to TSVs allows interconnections to be denser. It also it frees designers from the tyranny of the rectangular “farm plot,” letting them design chip layouts more like circuit boards. Areas devoid of circuitry could be used for other structures, such as vertical interconnection buses or even chimneys for refrigerant gases. Heterogeneous 3-D stacked dice also offer a new level of integration, as whole systems can be combined into a single silicon brick.

 

“The most important thing that 3-D ICs bring is an opportunity to get away from the farm analogy, where every chip is divided up into adjoining rectangular neighborhoods that are fully populated,” said Doherty. “Instead of trying to use up all of the real estate on a chip, 3-D chip designers are going to start cutting out squares, triangles and circles [from dice] for vertical interconnect and to carry away heat.

 

“A lot of new ideas for chip design are being made possible by 3-D. Designers are going to have to think differently, since they can now mix their CPU, memory and I/O functions in novel ways that couldn’t be done when everything had to fit side-by-side on one postage stamp.”

 

The various semiconductor associations are all undertaking standards efforts for 3-D techniques. Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International has four groups working on 3-D IC standards. Its Three-Dimensional Stacked Integrated Circuits Standards Committee includes SEMI members Globalfoundries, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Samsung and United Microelectronics Corp. (UMC), as well as Amkor, ASE, Europe’s Interuniversity Microelectronics Center (IMEC), Asia’s Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), Olympus, Qualcomm, Semilab, Tokyo Electron and Xilinx.

 

Sematech, for its part, has established a 3-D Design Enablement Center. Participants include Altera, Analog Devices, LSI, ON Semiconductor and Qualcomm. Sematech also operates a 300-mm 3-D IC pilot line at the University of Albany’s College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering in New York state.

 

IMEC (Leuven, Belgium) is working with Cascade Microtech Inc. (Beaverton, Ore.) in the testing and characterization of 3-D ICs. And German research institute Fraunhofer IZM says it will be able to integrate processor, memory, logic, analog, MEMS and RF chips into monolithic 3-D ICs by 2014.

 

ITRI, based in Taiwan, sponsors a 3-D IC consortium that today has more than 20 members. Many of those participants are promising end-to-end 3-D IC foundry services starting as early as next year.

 

In September, at the 3-D IC Technology Forum held during Semicon Taiwan, Intel was reported to be working on stacked-die 3-D ICs (not to be confused with its FinFET trigate transistors, which are not intended for 3-D ICs). Also at Semicon, Elpida Memory (Tokyo) was reported to have made progress with Powertech Technology and UMC on a 2-Gbit DRAM that uses stacked DDR3 dice linked by high-density TSVs.

 

The Joint Electron Device Engineering Council is pioneering a Wide I/O standard for 3-D ICs that’s due by year’s end. The Jedec spec will support 512-bit-wide interfaces.

 

France’s CEA-Leti (Grenoble) is working with STMicroelectronics and silicon interposer maker Shinko Electric Industries Co. to smooth the 2.5-D to 3-D IC transition. The group is prototyping devices now at a 300-mm wafer fabrication facility and promises commercial designs as early as 2012.

 

Longer-range efforts are under way in Europe’s CMOSAIC program to find novel methods of cooling monolithic 3-D chip stacks beyond 2013. The four-year project involves IBM Zurich, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (Paris) and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.

 





wbayer

10/11/2011 2:23 PM EDT

FYI, the Silicon Integration Initiative (Si2) also has a 3D standards effort under way, and is cooperating with the other entities listed in this excellent article to be sure there is no overlap.
For more info http://www.si2.org/?page=1380

Sign in to Reply



resistion

10/11/2011 6:48 PM EDT

The serial nature of stacking and the vertical thermal proximity are fundamental concerns.

Sign in to Reply



hm

10/11/2011 7:04 PM EDT

Long term reliability of these parts is also of concern. There has to be new testing methodology.

Sign in to Reply



Astronut

10/12/2011 12:19 PM EDT

hm: You're right! Although 3D itself shouldn't affect lifetime (none of our 3D-ICs from 2004 have failed yet), when more circuitry is added the mean time between failures is likely to become unacceptably small. Continual on-chip testing may be the answer.

Sign in to Reply



resistion

10/12/2011 2:30 PM EDT

Hope that can remain an option not become a specific requirement. :)

Sign in to Reply



chipmonk

10/12/2011 1:11 PM EDT

An excellent overview of current 3D status and roadmap except for the glaring omission of Allvia - a small foundry located right here in Si Valley that has pioneered TSV technology at a prototype level for the last 5-6 years and provides smaller customers access to this technology. They also have Si Interposers with integrated capacitors.

Sign in to Reply



JoeData

10/12/2011 1:49 PM EDT

Sounds like a perfect use for industrial diamonds - underfill material!

Sign in to Reply



chipmonk

10/13/2011 3:17 PM EDT

vapor deposition is being tried but cost remains an issue

Sign in to Reply



elctrnx_lyf

10/12/2011 2:19 PM EDT

will this technology be complete future in the next few years to much higher density processors on a single chip.

Sign in to Reply



resistion

10/12/2011 2:32 PM EDT

One also mustn't lose sight of 3d interconnect taking up more and more area especially with more and more stacked dies.

Sign in to Reply



chipmonk

10/13/2011 3:28 PM EDT

yes, the TSVs will take up about 15 - 20 % space on a die ( including the bond pads & keep-outs to isolate transistors from stress induced by the TSVs ) but this would be a wash since no large bond pads would be required for wire bonds any more. Because of the short I/O length ( low loss ) and high I/O density possible, TSVs will enable a lot of high - perf / low - power / compact designs.

Sign in to Reply



Astronut

10/13/2011 3:42 PM EDT

resiston: Many of the 3D interconnects won't go through the whole stack, just 1 or 2 layers. Only the signals to the outside world need to emerge at the surface.

Sign in to Reply



Rchandta1

10/12/2011 8:04 PM EDT

.."volume commercialization of heterogeneous stacks of processor, memory, mixed-signal, networking and I/O chips formed into silicon skyscrapers as high as 100 chips per stack .." - this is very ambitious goal!!
Generally sounds reasonable, but very skeptical of the idea of liquid cooling. May fine for special application but definitely not for commercial.

Sign in to Reply



ATUL SRIVASTAVA

10/13/2011 2:32 AM EDT

This will obviously need new generation of EDA tools too . What is the status on that front ?

Sign in to Reply



pinhead

10/13/2011 1:19 PM EDT

Good question. I was working for one of the cutting edge 3D companies a year ago, and at that point, the EDA was more or less non existent. It was just hacking things together manually.

Sign in to Reply



Astronut

10/13/2011 3:47 PM EDT

ATUL: Micro Magic, Magma, and R3Logic all have 3D-aware EDA tools; but there are still some gaps in the 3D toolset.

Sign in to Reply



docdivakar

10/13/2011 7:30 PM EDT

I agree... secondly one must realize that 3D IC design is also a packaging exercise so that needs to be addressed concurrently. Otherwise, there will be costly repititions and try outs of what is manufacturable.

MP Divakar

Sign in to Reply



collin

10/13/2011 11:51 AM EDT

I think TI is also developing 3-D IC now. If we have 3-D IC, does it mean that we could see 3-D video on TV, website,mobile phone,tablet,and all other devices which have display terminal?

Sign in to Reply



Astronut

10/13/2011 3:48 PM EDT

collin: 3-D video is a very different thing from 3D-ICs. 3D-IC refers to a way of designing and manufacturing chips; 3-D video is an application. No relation.

Sign in to Reply



docdivakar

10/13/2011 7:27 PM EDT

@Colin Johnson: other entities involved in 3D IC standardization is GSA which has been meeting 4 to 6 times a year on this topic, and Si2 Consortium.

IBM's work in 3D IC by stacking is nothing new, definitely not a secret. At CANDE 2010 and also at GSA 3D Standards meeting earlier this year, there were presentations by IBM folks so I am not at all surprised. What surprises me is 3M taking on the challenge to develop a thermal interface material with high conductivity for gaps less than 1um.

My earlier posting on 3D-related article is here:

http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4215464/Si2-to-form-3-D-IC-standards-group?cid=NL_EETimesDaily

MP Divakar

Sign in to Reply



Oscar Law

10/17/2011 9:08 PM EDT

I think that there are still few challenges for 3D IC design:
- How can we test all IC before they are stacked together?
- Most of current 3D IC is limited to memory or sensor only, it takes time to develop complete strategy for stacking real ASIC together
- Wafer handling and KGD becomes nightmare for product engineer
- How can we handle thermal issues?
- 3M approaches may be good solution and we shall see how to apply this for production. However, I don't prefer liquid cooling solution, it is too complicated for implementation
- New 3D chip architecture related with TSV placement will solve the problem with lower cost
- Is new 3D IC EDA tools required or not?
- I prefer hybrid 3D IC design flow, it re-uses most of current ASIC flow with minor modification, it not only reduces the cost but also shortens the design cycle. For example, the multiple die physical verification time can be reduced by 10X or more through minor changes in current flow.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)