datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


yalanand

11/4/2011 2:15 AM EDT

I believe Solar manufacturers will do better in coming days because many ...

More...



chanj

11/1/2011 1:29 PM EDT

Is it really the cost of solar energy too high that kills this business? Or it ...

More...

First Solar CEO resigns; stock sinks

Sylvie Barak

10/25/2011 7:07 PM EDT

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.--News that First Solar CEO Robert Gillette had stepped down sent shares in the company plummeting 25 percent on Tuesday (Oct. 25), in a year where the Arizona-based company’s stock has already lost over 70 percent of its value.

No reason was given for Gillette’s sudden departure, but he is the third executive to leave the energy company this year, after First Solar's president of operations Bruce Sohn resigned in April and president of the firm’s utility systems unit, Jens Meyerhoff, left last month. 

Gillette had served as CEO of First Solar for the past two years, a time of intense turbulence in the solar industry, in which U.S. based firms faced increasing competition from cheaper Chinese competitors and crystalline silicon producers. Demand for solar panels has also petered off after several European countries ended green energy incentive plans this year.

The industry is also thought to have been adversely affected by the Solyndra scandal earlier this year, in which California based solar panel manufacturer Solyndra took $535 million in federal loan guarantees before filing for bankruptcy and laying off over 1000 workers. Solyndra had previously been singled out by the Obama administration as a strong example to follow in terms of green job initiatives.

First Solar too has received some $3.1 billion from the U.S. government’s Energy Department, and is also thought to be facing job cuts, with analysts predicting a cull of some 10 percent of the workforce due to underutilization of factories.

“We believe the news (along with timing of announcement) is likely to raise a lot of investor questions about the health of overall industry as well as near/longer term profitability outlook of the company,” said Deutsche Bank in a statement advising investors to hold when it came to buying First Solar stock.

First Solar shares on Tuesday had fallen to $43, and the firm’s current market capitalization is thought to be around $4 billion.

The company's chairman and founder, Mike Ahearn, will take on the role of interim CEO while the firm searches for a permanent replacement for Gillette.

The firm will announce its official earnings next week.





Robotics Developer

10/25/2011 9:41 PM EDT

I wonder about the timing of the departure and the upcoming official earnings announcement next week. I think that solar energy is a great idea but is not economically feasible given lower cost power and availability. Solar has its place: remote area power, temporary/portable power, but for full time commercial power generation it just does not seem ready "for prime time". Until it is I fear that we will hear of more solar companies in dark times.

Sign in to Reply



wilber_xbox

10/26/2011 7:02 AM EDT

i agree with you that given the timing of the Gillette's departure market does not expect any good news from the financial report.

Sign in to Reply



GREAT-Terry

10/26/2011 1:17 AM EDT

Regarding the green energy, it is nearly impossible to find an economic way to sustain provided the cost of power is now so low (comparatively). So even though the green energy is so important to the future of human being and the planet, it is an industry that can only be supported by Govenment. That means, it is just like an insurance paid by everybody. I'm afriad all solar companies and other green energy related companies are facing dark time.

Sign in to Reply



kdboyce

10/26/2011 1:59 AM EDT

First Solar also just recently sold 2 of its solar energy farms which had just started construction in September 2011 to satisfy a Government condition for receipt of federal funds for 3 projects. Only 2 started construction and qualified for ~$2Billion in loan guarantees.

Tellingly, On September 30, 2011, GE and NextEra agreed to purchase Desert Sun Solar Farm from First Solar just one day after the DOE approved a $646Million loan guarantee.

Because of no loan guarantee on the third project, they are attempting to sell it as well and are having trouble finding buyers.

http://www.energyboom.com/finance/first-solar-sells-two-california-solar-farms

What would give First Solar another blow would be to find connections between either the executives or directors to fund raising (bundling) for Obama similar to what was uncovered at Solyndra. The GE participation in the purchase is already suspicious in light the close relationship of Jeffrey Immelt and the Obama administration.

Sign in to Reply



wilber_xbox

10/26/2011 7:04 AM EDT

Solar is facing a tough time not only because of the Chinese companies but also from the higher cost based technology. The short term viability is expensive and given the nature of solar power; uncertain.

Sign in to Reply



Sanjib.Acharya

10/26/2011 11:15 AM EDT

It is really bad time for the Solar companies. Is the cost competition for the solar panel the primary factor? Or is it bacause of the technology is not yet upto the mark?
I think, the industry badly needs a technological breakthrough.

Sign in to Reply



jnissen

10/26/2011 11:57 AM EDT

No it's because the whole industry was based upon incentives from governments across the globe. When the "Global Warming" hoax was finally uncovered with the email leaks and clearly cooked data the money started to dry up. There is still a big push by the greenies to fund these projects but the reality of economic feasibility is starting to kick in. Add on top of this the Chinese are still going full blast with their cheap solar incentives for plants the domestic Solar companies are getting hurt badly.

The political connected loans is just an unfortunate reality of "free money" and a bunch of spineless politicians and greedy executives peddling the wares.

Sign in to Reply



SylvieBarak

10/26/2011 12:04 PM EDT

Apparently, it's only in the U.S. that the situation is quite as dire. Panel investment is in Japan and China....

Sign in to Reply



Sanjib.Acharya

10/26/2011 12:09 PM EDT

I recall there were a couple or more "Solar-thermal" projects got kicked-off about an year back. How are those going?

Sign in to Reply



chipmonk

10/26/2011 1:50 PM EDT

Compared to chips, xtalline Si semiconductor based Solar PV technology is far simpler in design or mfg. which is why China has caught up so quickly. But PV is still a technology under development ( new materials & configurations ) to achieve grid parity and still requires a lot of subsidy and patience.

The development of relatively simple devices like PV in the US provides a lower return compared to doing it in China ( engineering cost there still only about 40 % of the US ). So the "smart" money is staying away from investing in Solar development in the US and actively siphons out US developed PV technologies to China !


The only way to compete with China in PV is to develop technologies that totally sidestep their current capacity in conventional Si wafer based cells and panels, and delivers a lower cost / watt after installation. However the key to lowering cost of PV Solar is no longer just in the cells themselves but in assembling the panels and in their installation.

Paradoxically the Obama Admin's political compulsion to create a lot of Green jobs in the short term has emphasized on the installation of panels made with current technologies ( often from China ) at the expense of R&D & have actually driven up installation costs in the US !

Even if funding for PV R&D in the US once again starts to flow, to protect any IP from China, all operations will have to be guarded ( doubtful ) from China's friends in the US.

Sign in to Reply



chanj

11/1/2011 1:29 PM EDT

Is it really the cost of solar energy too high that kills this business? Or it is the government subsidy in elsewhere that lowers the competitiveness of US based solar manufacturer?

Sign in to Reply



yalanand

11/4/2011 2:15 AM EDT

I believe Solar manufacturers will do better in coming days because many countries have started moving away from nuclear power plants. Even in India people are opposing creation of new nuclear power plants. And I believe solar is the only viable alternative to nuclear energy. I feel this is great to enter these stocks.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)