News & Analysis
Comment
docdivakar
I agree data is king but it has to be useful, validated & correlated data / meta ...
iniewski
thank you Colin but 19% penetration by `smart systems` implies that the `dumb ...
In a smart-system world, data’s ‘the new currency’
R Colin Johnson
11/7/2011 9:40 AM EST
IBM probably has the deepest understanding of smart systems today. Dozens of its so-called smarter-planet systems are already solving widespread infrastructure problems worldwide, including a smart transportation system in Stockholm, Sweden; a national smart grid—the world’s first—in Malta; and a smart wireless sensor network that protects paintings at the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art.
“Smart systems are generating eight times more data every day than there is in all the U.S. libraries combined—85 percent of which is unstructured,” said Jai Menon, IBM fellow, chief technology officer and vice president of technical strategy for the company’s systems group. “Business intelligence has the problem of using analytics to derive value from all that unstructured data, and Watson is a good example of how to answer questions about unstructured data very quickly.”
Traditional IT analytics were run on structured data that was carefully tailored by database experts into neat, isomorphic containers that could be easily searched, sorted and analyzed using well-known mathematical formulas. But Watson proved that messy, unstructured data can also be easily searched, by virtue of cleverly crafted analytics designed to run on optimized system architectures that preposition the technological capabilities needed to address specific unstructured problem domains.
“Analytics for the financial markets—such as predicting commodity prices—is a cyclical phenomenon driven by well-known patterns. But predicting the risk of failure in infrastructure—say, how long a water pipe will last—is what we call an unstructured problem,” said Arun Hampapur, distinguished engineer and director of business analytics at IBM Research. “And analytics for unstructured problems is best done by instrumenting a strategy that custom-tailors the analytics and architecture for a particular problem domain.”
IBM’s latest foray into addressing unstructured problem domains with smart systems is aimed at using Watson to create automated advisers for apps in health care, banking and finance, retailing, law and governmental regulation. “We get calls every day from industry leaders who want to repurpose Watson for new applications, such as helping to make airline reservations faster, better, easier,” said Hampapur.
For instance, Wellpoint Inc. (Indianapolis), the nation’s largest health-care provider, recently announced that it would use a Watson-derived smart system to simplify and speed medical diagnoses by matching patients’ symptom sets with data from millions of medical records, journal articles and late-breaking medical-research results.
Watson is based on technologies that IBM created to solve unstructured problems in smart-city projects. IBM started its quest for such smart systems by leveraging its strengths in the data center, where traditional analytics are run. But it has been steadily working out toward the edge of the connectivity network, where analytics can be run on the embedded processors themselves. Menon noted that Chicago police “use smart analytics at the edge to automatically turn surveillance cameras toward a gunshot, so that by the time the 911 call comes in they already have a readout of the caliber of gun that was used and a camera pointing at the location from which it was fired.”
IBM has spent more than $15 billion in the past few years acquiring companies with specialized analytics expertise, and it is building a new generation of cognitive-computer chips for smarter systems that can fuse the inputs from multiple sensors.


iniewski
11/7/2011 10:48 AM EST
1 trillion for smart systems seems to be high as only recently the whole electronics sector world-wide was estimated to be at 1 trillion...but I guess it depends what is counted as smart and what is dumb...what is exactly the definition of "smart" in this context? (or in any other context for that matter?)...Kris
Sign in to Reply
R_Colin_Johnson
11/17/2011 1:29 PM EST
IDC is counting "19% of all major electronic system unit shipments in 2010" as smart systems. Their full report is described here: http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=230242
Sign in to Reply
tjsalo
11/7/2011 5:23 PM EST
"Data _are_ the new currency". "Datum is ..." is also correct. "Data is ..." is never correct (except maybe in the Wired style [sic} manual).
Sign in to Reply
Frank Eory
11/7/2011 7:57 PM EST
It appears that the English language has evolved on this issue, and "data" finds frequent usage as a singular noun, synonymous with "information."
To say "Data are the new currency" is grammatically correct, but to most English speakers it simply sounds wrong.
Sign in to Reply
GREAT-Terry
11/7/2011 10:22 PM EST
Smart system with cognitive computer is a good idea. I guess we'll see more and more "smart" system once cloud computing becomes mature. At the end, Si-Fi living style will come and people will be too dependent on computer. BTW, computer is not a term people use, it may become some warmly and friendly names.
Sign in to Reply
doctor-j007
11/10/2011 11:00 AM EST
Although I admit this U. of Maryland(UoM) ISR’s “modeling hub” design methodology goes much beyond the Russian Patent Reviewer Genrich Altshuller’s TRIZ or TIPS (TIPS (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving)), because TRIZ only comes up a “Theory” to smartly apply “Someone somewhere has already solved something like my problem intelligently.”, while “modeling hub” will allow an entire ecosystem of smart-system components to spring forth from small-company innovators using the collaborators’ standards.
However, I think the jury is still out on whether there exists an integrated approach to discovering and codifying a common design methodology for smart systems. However, if ISR will be able achieve all the goals they set up to do, then I think they should be rated between Level 4 “Invention outside the paradigm” and Level 5, “Discovery” in system design or system engineering field according to Altshuller’s rating on “Levels of Innovation!
Note: Levels of Innovation by Altshuller:
• Level 5: Discovery (less than1%)
# Laser, radio, airplane
• Level 4: Invention outside the paradigm (~4%)
# Jet aircraft, integrated circuits, invention of telephone
• Level 3: Invention inside the paradigm (~18%)
# Automatic transmission, beeper - mobile phone
• Level 2: Improvement (~45%)
# Bifocal glasses, beeper
• Level 1: Apparent solution (no invention) –
Re-usage (~32%)
Sign in to Reply
iniewski
11/17/2011 1:44 PM EST
thank you Colin but 19% penetration by `smart systems` implies that the `dumb systems` are 4x that which is 4 trillion, and that seems very high...I would had gone to the original report but $8,000 for the report is a little too much for my pocket ;-)...Kris
Sign in to Reply
docdivakar
11/29/2011 1:32 AM EST
I agree data is king but it has to be useful, validated & correlated data / meta data in an era of exploding noise! To that end, there is a whole new re-definition of sensor / smart appliance data fusino that is evolving now a days!
MP Divakar
Sign in to Reply