datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


iniewski

12/8/2011 10:10 AM EST

thank you @agk...static body bias would just shift VTH permanently so it will ...

More...



agk

12/8/2011 4:31 AM EST

DDC 43 nm needs body bias either fixed or dynamic to make the transitor faster ...

More...

IEDM: SuVolta transistor operates down to 0.4-V

Peter Clarke

12/7/2011 7:28 AM EST


LONDON – Startup SuVolta Inc. has announced that its novel transistor technology, dubbed PowerShrink, operates down to 0.425-V, approximately 300-mV below conventional processes. PowerShrink is based on a deeply depleted channel (DDC) transistor manufactured in epitixially grown doped silicon on the surface of a conventional bulk CMOS wafer.

The progress is set to be discussed in a paper due to be presented at the International Electron Device Meeting presented by a researcher from Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd.

The paper entitled: Advanced channel engineering achieving aggressive reduction of VT variation for ultra-low-power applications, is co-authored by Fujitsu and SuVolta (Los Gatos, Calif.).

The reduction in variation is important because leakage current in transistors is exponentially dependent on VT and power dissipation is dominated by the low edge of the VT distribution. The tighter the distribution the lower the VT can be set.

Fujitsu has demonstrated low voltage operation of a 576-kbit SRAM block based on SuVolta's PowerShrink implemented in a 65-nm CMOS process technology. SuVolta is pitching PowerShrink as an alternative to both FinFETs and fully depleted SOI (FDSOI) which are generally considered to be the major strands of process technology beyond 22-nm. Intel has already introduced a FinFET process technology.

SuVolta's is hoping that publicly disclosed progress by Fujitsu will help persuade process research groups that its approach is superior to FinFET in that it more easily supports multiple threshold voltages over a wider voltage range, and lower cost than FDSOI in that it does not require premium-priced SOI wafers as its starting point.




iniewski

12/7/2011 12:26 PM EST

SuVolta continues to come up with very exciting announcements...but how one develops very advanced transistor structures without access to a state-of-the-art fab?...was the work done at Fujitsu's facilities? Kris

Sign in to Reply



peter.clarke

12/7/2011 12:39 PM EST

@kris

I don't think it is made explicit exactly where the work was done. But I think it is safe to assume it was done at a Fujitsu wafer fab or research fab where they can run the 65-nm CMOS manufacturing process.

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

12/7/2011 12:45 PM EST

thank you Peter...low VDD operation requires low VTH...but a textbook challenge of lowering VTH is increased leakage current (it is an exponential increase), perhaps someone from SuVolta can explain how they have overcome that challenge...Kris

Sign in to Reply



peter.clarke

12/7/2011 3:05 PM EST

My understanding is that the text book challenge to increased leakage current in bulk CMOS is because of the depth of the transistor channel

Like FinFET and FDSOI, DDC has a shallow and tightly controlled channel. Unlike FinFET DDC can support multiple VTs easily.

Sign in to Reply



agk

12/8/2011 4:31 AM EST

DDC 43 nm needs body bias either fixed or dynamic to make the transitor faster and less leakier.

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

12/8/2011 10:10 AM EST

thank you @agk...static body bias would just shift VTH permanently so it will not solve anything...how would dynamic bias work? low VTH when in operation and high VTH when powered off?...I thought the same trick is used in many processes (like SOI for example)...Kris

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)