datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


JefW

7/18/2012 7:30 AM EDT

Sigh. These whiskers clearly don't grow from the solder joints but the tin ...

More...



divide_by_zero

1/18/2012 12:03 PM EST

What's really scary is the RoHS Recast, where the category called Control and ...

More...

Toyota accelerations revisited—hanging by a (tin) whisker

Rick DeMeis

1/10/2012 8:39 AM EST

Several accelerator pedal position sensors had tin whiskers that could cause short circuits. A NASA paper delivered at the International Tin Whisker Symposium last year reported on tin whisker growth in Toyota accelerator pedal position sensors that, depending on pedal rate of movement, could lead to unintended acceleration.

The whiskers were found in a "failed" sensor from a 2003 Camry and at least two other similar units that did not malfunction. The sensor in question was used on the Camry from 2002 to 2006 model years, and the specific Camry with the defective sensor (which was furnished to NASA) had 82,000 miles on it. The vehicle owner reported the car as "undrivable," with throttle response as: "I couldn't get any 'gas', and then the car would jerk forward at a rapid rate." The sensor had at least 17 whiskers in it, only one of which shorted contacts.




While the inspected sensors noted above could be typical of the entire lot, these incidents of whisker growth and shorting give cause for safety concern across the industry.

The NASA paper gives further insight by detailing tin whisker physical behavior as well as outlining guidelines and methods of detecting whiskers. But rather than summarize the report here, readers can access the easily read, but complete, 30 page NASA presentation by clicking here.

Rick DeMeis is editor of Automotive Designline.




pixies

1/10/2012 9:54 AM EST

Why is NASA working on this earthly problem?

Sign in to Reply



nicolas.mokhoff

1/10/2012 11:16 AM EST

pixies: if I read the NASA report correctly, the request for NASA to step in was made by the Department of Transportation based on a complaint submitted to DOT by a driver of a 2003 Toyota Camry who experienced the problem (see page 13 of the pdf): http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/reference/tech_papers/2011-NASA-GSFC-whisker-failure-app-sensor.pdf

Sign in to Reply



markhahn

1/10/2012 2:47 PM EST

the first 'A' in NASA is for aeronautics, which field has a long history of sensor use and forensic post-mortems. I guess it's the latter expertise that made NASA a good choice for this. and bravo to them!

Sign in to Reply



tb1

1/11/2012 12:42 PM EST

So is this European bureaucratic push to lead-free solder a mistake? The argument they always made to the various problems it creates was "The engineers will figure it out. They always have in the past."

Consider:
-Lead is a neurotoxin, and having it in the environment is a bad thing. But my understanding is that lead solder doesn't leach into the environment.
-Using lead-free solder requires higher assembly temperatures, using much more energy.
-The higher soldering temperatures requires more exotic materials to prevent damage--some of which may have their own environmental problems.
-Even with the more exotic material, there are still going to be more damage occuring during assembly due to the higher temps, resulting in more failures (and more trash), and reduced reliablility.

The lead-free tin-whisker problem is better understood and controlled than it had been in the past, but it is not eliminated. That's good for companies selling consumer goods, because the equipment is more likely to fail over time so they will be able to sell more products. But it isn't so good for the environment (more trash) and, as this article shows, for safety.

You could argue that you could still use lead solder for safety critical components. But it doesn't work that way. Processor and memory chip companies don't want to build their products both ways, so they ONLY offer them in lead-free packages. Even with exemptions, there's no choice but to build products lead-free.

That's true for car brake systems and for nuclear reactors.

Sign in to Reply



DrQuine

1/14/2012 11:45 AM EST

The law of unintended consequences: when direct mechanical linkages are replaced with "fly-by-wire" connections some very subtle failure modes can arise.

Sign in to Reply



divide_by_zero

1/18/2012 12:03 PM EST

What's really scary is the RoHS Recast, where the category called Control and Monitoring Equipment will be lose its exemption for consumer goods in mid-2014, with industrial equipment phased in at later dates. This category includes all kinds temperature, humidity, gas, fluid level, etc. sensors and alarms, including smoke, carbon monoxide, burglar and other types of security equipment. It also covers devices like PID controllers and motion sensors. Typical installed lifetimes for these devices in homes is up to 10 years.

I'm a tree-hugger myself, but I think the mandatory use of lead-free solder is extremely wrong-headed, especially where human safety is involved. These types of products should maintain their exemptions until such time that whisker-free solder is available in the market. Expecting working solutions to gnarly technical problems to appear by legislative fiat doesn't always work.

Sign in to Reply



JefW

7/18/2012 7:30 AM EDT

Sigh. These whiskers clearly don't grow from the solder joints but the tin plating. Although I've heard that corrosion can generate them on any tin surface, I've only seen whiskers on bent component leads some distance from the solder.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)