datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


chipmonk

1/12/2012 12:19 PM EST

Hector the Sector Wrector was not happy with just bringing down SPS, he went on ...

More...



peter.clarke

1/12/2012 4:37 AM EST

Not an error surely, just being humerous. And because it was humorous use of $, ...

More...

Intel tips Medfield specs, Lenovo, Motorola deals

Peter Clarke

1/10/2012 8:00 PM EST

Performance claims

Mike Bell, vice president and general manager of the Mobile Wireless Group at Intel, said the Penwell chip has better performance at the same power consumption as rival SoCs and in some cases can demonstrate better performance at lower power consumption. In a slide presentation the company claimed it has performance leadership at competitive smartphone power consumption levels but produced no quantitative data to support this. It did show itself to being not the best performing chip for a 720p video playback benchmark performing, but also claimed to be far from the worst. 

The Medfield chip includes the single-core Saltwall, 512-kbytes of level-2 cache, the single-core SGX540 2-D/3-D graphics processor licensed from Imagination Technologies Group plc (Kings Langley, England) as well as blocks for high definition (1080p) multi-standard video encode/decode and separate programmable image signal processor. The graphics processor is clocked at 400-MHz.

High power consumption has been a criticism of Intel's SoC designs in the past and to save it Intel has added a raft of power management features.

The Penwell SoC has a dedicated 32-nm process and Intel has made design changes in the creation of Saltwell CPU core to support a lower than usual minimum voltage operation. It also has what it describes as an ultra-low power L2 cache. Intel did not give the low voltage figure now supported by Penwell.

The company has also specified numerous dynamic clock frequency stepping points to allow the voltage to be reduced and power saved. The CPU clock can be reduced from 1.6-GHz to 100-MHz. There is also a variety of standby modes with various standby power consumptions and resumption latencies.

Pennwell SoC power consumption*

Clk freq.    Power

1.6-GHz    ~750-mW
1.3-GHz    ~500-mW
600-MHz    ~175-mW
100-MHz    ~ 50-mW
zero        ~ 1 to 18-mW**

**CPU state preserved in SRAM with <100-microseconds exit latency
*Assuming junction temperature of 70C and steady state worst case application loading.

The Penwell SoC is designed to support an 8- to 24-megapixel primary camera as well as a secondary 2-megapixel camera. To aid catching the right shot the SoC also supports 10-frame burst-mode photography mode. That captures 10 full 8-megapixel pictures at 15 frames per second. Part of the support for this is in the image signal processing core which is believed to derive from the technology of Silicon Hive, acquired by Intel in February 2011. Silicon Hive had been licensing its technology to Intel for several years prior to the acquisition.




rick.merritt

1/10/2012 8:16 PM EST

800 milliW peak at 1.6 GHz ain't bad.

I'm guessing Moto would be more likely to experiment with an Atom tablet than smartphone, but we'll see. They are a good reference account to get.

One would think with all its long term Taiwan connections, HTC would be a shoe in. But then again I am not sure it strays far from Qualcomm in the apps processor.

Sign in to Reply



Happy Heyoka

1/11/2012 1:20 AM EST

Nice typos in the platform overview ('cryto' instead of 'crypto' and a dollar sign for cache - obviously an artist that mistook 'cash' for 'cache')

Given that there's already a x86 build of Android, it shouldn't be too hard to put a phone together, although it looks like a nice device for all sorts of embedded stuff...

Sign in to Reply



peter.clarke

1/11/2012 6:30 AM EST

Cryto clearly is a typographic error. But I think use of the dollar sign is now a "standard" way of indicating cache memory.

I have seen I$ and D$ used for instruction cache and data cache on many diagrams over many years.

Sign in to Reply



Happy Heyoka

1/11/2012 10:47 PM EST

If you'll excuse me for being pedantic, repeating the same error over and over doesn't make it right :-)

Even if 'cash' and 'cache' are homophones where you come from, their etymology is completely different.

Some engineer in the past took the trouble to pick _exactly_ the right word for the job. That engineer may even have worked at Intel...

Sign in to Reply



peter.clarke

1/12/2012 4:37 AM EST

Not an error surely, just being humerous. And because it was humorous use of $, the usage stuck.

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

1/11/2012 1:28 AM EST

BTW, Intel had a tablet reference design for Medfield before it had the smartphone one.

It is hungry for designs in both categories.

Sign in to Reply



peter.clarke

1/11/2012 7:41 AM EST

Oops must have missed that reference design.

Nonetheless the emphasis of my 20 minute chat with Intel executives was all about smartphones.

Sign in to Reply



goafrit

1/11/2012 2:35 PM EST

Any implication for Qualcomm Snapdragon and the stock?

Sign in to Reply



peter.clarke

1/11/2012 4:36 PM EST

Well to have an idea how well Medfield would do in the market there needs to be some meaningful benchmarking.

According to reports, a tablet based on Medfield should do well at something called CaffeineMark, and outperform Tegra 2, Snapdragon MSM8260 and Samsung Exynos.

When it comes to stock values, the objective truth does not matter while perception is everything. So what is your perception of whether Intel's CES showing will hurt Qualcomm and others?





Sign in to Reply



tangey

1/11/2012 6:38 AM EST

Motorola has already confirmed that medfield smartphone will be qualified in the summer and released sometime after that.

Sign in to Reply



goafrit

1/11/2012 2:34 PM EST

Any link? What does this mean for Qualcomm stocks?

Sign in to Reply



green_ee

1/11/2012 4:21 PM EST

Note that Medfield is 32nm (a process that has been in production at Intel for years) and the next generations at 22nm and 14nm are in the pipeline which should be even more power-efficient.

Sign in to Reply



Lee Harrison

1/11/2012 6:30 PM EST

I've no opinion or expertise on the technologies here, but doesn't anyone else think it is a very strange day when Motorola in an Intel client for a phone chipset?

Sign in to Reply



donw_s11

1/11/2012 6:36 PM EST

You can thank Hector Ruiz for that. At one time Moto was quite competitive in small microprocessors.

Sign in to Reply



chipmonk

1/12/2012 12:19 PM EST

Hector the Sector Wrector was not happy with just bringing down SPS, he went on to wreck AMD too !

Sign in to Reply



Code Monkey

1/11/2012 8:06 PM EST

I love the name. Hopefully Disney won't give them any grief about using the name Medfield.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)