News & Analysis
Comment
elctrnx_lyf
Qualcomm doesn't want to lose on the investment they made in the graphic chip ...
david.may
could "not"
Qualcomm not worried about mobile graphics competition
Sylvie Barak
3/1/2012 11:57 AM EST
Thermal efficiency and form factor
Another factor Chandhok said was becoming increasingly important as phones become ever more powerful is having what he called a “superior michroarchitecture” to deliver thermal as well as power efficiency.
“It’s important to think about how you drive the form factor without having [the phone] melt,” he said, claiming that some of Qualcomm’s competition could quote fast clock speeds, but that these came at a high thermal cost that could result in a short lifespan of the phones.
“Don’t just think ‘how fast can this device run?’ but rather, ‘how long can this device run that fast?’,” he said noting that the performance needed to be sustainable.
Showing a slide of Qualcomm’s thermal efficiency compared with two competitors (we’re told unofficially that these are probably TI and Nvidia), Chandhok said the S4 was really a study in how to get the most power out of a processor while avoiding the detrimental effects of hotspots and overheating.

Giving a quick Windows phone update, Chandhok told press the operating system would make 2012/2013 really interesting years for the mobile device market, and said Microsoft had been able to take advantage of Qualcomm chips “in a way no other platform does.”
“They really squeeze out every drop of performance from our chip,” he said, noting that the Windows platform had a ton of features Qualcomm looked forward to leveraging.
Asked whether that meant the chip maker may be mulling more of a move into the computer and desktop space, however, Chandhok replied, “I don’t even know what desktop means anymore.”
Another factor Chandhok said was becoming increasingly important as phones become ever more powerful is having what he called a “superior michroarchitecture” to deliver thermal as well as power efficiency.
“It’s important to think about how you drive the form factor without having [the phone] melt,” he said, claiming that some of Qualcomm’s competition could quote fast clock speeds, but that these came at a high thermal cost that could result in a short lifespan of the phones.
“Don’t just think ‘how fast can this device run?’ but rather, ‘how long can this device run that fast?’,” he said noting that the performance needed to be sustainable.
Showing a slide of Qualcomm’s thermal efficiency compared with two competitors (we’re told unofficially that these are probably TI and Nvidia), Chandhok said the S4 was really a study in how to get the most power out of a processor while avoiding the detrimental effects of hotspots and overheating.

Giving a quick Windows phone update, Chandhok told press the operating system would make 2012/2013 really interesting years for the mobile device market, and said Microsoft had been able to take advantage of Qualcomm chips “in a way no other platform does.”
“They really squeeze out every drop of performance from our chip,” he said, noting that the Windows platform had a ton of features Qualcomm looked forward to leveraging.
Asked whether that meant the chip maker may be mulling more of a move into the computer and desktop space, however, Chandhok replied, “I don’t even know what desktop means anymore.”
Navigate to related information


chipmonk
3/1/2012 2:32 PM EST
QC does sound a bit defensive about their graphics and seem to be trying to make up for it by quoting various factors ( 2 vs 4 cores, hotspots, life - when most of us change phones within 2 years ) that the average end customer may not care about and thus may not play a role in selecting the chip by a smart phone mfr.
Sign in to Reply
Jeanshack
3/1/2012 4:19 PM EST
There was an article on EE Times Europe sometime back written by a guy from ST Ericsson with an argument that Quad cores were definitely ahead of its time.
Qualcomm expressing a similar thought would mean NVIDIA is definitely rushing their processors to the market.
Qualcomm has the ability to design almost every piece of silicon in a handset and by far qualifies as the best system provider in this business, I am sure they can afford to lack in the GPU front and still have a lock on 30% of the smart phone market.
Sign in to Reply
goafrit
3/2/2012 11:30 AM EST
What do you want a public firm to say or do in the public? They cannot say they are not worried until they wake up one morning to obsolescence.
Sign in to Reply
selinz
3/2/2012 5:02 PM EST
Phones are handling a lot of tasks at once which, in a simple minded analysis, suggests that the user exp. will be better with 4 cores. I notice delays on my dual core tegra, even though it is (or at least, was) touted as best in class.
Sign in to Reply
david.may
3/4/2012 2:33 AM EST
"t is (or at least, was) touted as best in class."
they lied :)
NVIDIA Tegra 2 didnt have a NEON SIMD unit in it so it could be the best in class at the time... as the saying goes no NEON no good
Sign in to Reply
david.may
3/4/2012 2:34 AM EST
could "not"
Sign in to Reply
elctrnx_lyf
3/6/2012 5:30 AM EST
Qualcomm doesn't want to lose on the investment they made in the graphic chip market. They will go on developing more in house chipsets rather than buying it from imagination technologies.
Sign in to Reply