datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


TingLu

5/12/2012 6:19 PM EDT

ARM royalty is low due to its extreme high volume Micro Controller Cortex-Mx ...

More...



abraxalito

5/11/2012 12:56 AM EDT

The report raises as many questions as it answers - if ARM's royalty rates are ...

More...

ARM dominates 10B unit CPU core market

Rick Merritt

5/10/2012 12:22 AM EDT

Imagination, Ceva ride high
Like the CPU core market, the DSP and graphics core markets are dominated by single vendors.

Imagination Technologies took 82 percent of the graphics core market and increased its royalty revenue by 69 percent in 2011. Ceva took 90 percent of the DSP core market and expanded its DSP royalties by 59 percent.

The report counted Tensilica and Synopsys’ ARC cores as CPU blocks, although many are used as DSPs. However, even if both were counted as DSPs, Ceva would still dominate the sector, said Gardner. Ceva’s closest competitor is the ZSP core from Verisilicon that took nine percent of the market in 2011, according to the report.

Overall shipments of merchant DSP cores grew 44 percent in 2011 to see use in 1.16 billion chips in 2011, thanks mainly to their adoption as cellular baseband processors. To fuel growth, Ceva must “extend their reach and they are doing that with new products that address a broader range of markets--that’s their challenge,” said Gardner.

Graphics cores represent the smallest but fastest growing of the processor core markets. Shipments exceeded 300 million units in 2011, up from less than 90 million in 2008, the report said.

ARM took last place in this sector with a four percent share while Vivante was second and DMP third at eight and six percent, respectively.

“I’m still bullish on ARM’s Mali cores due to the company’s reach,” said Gardner. “They should do well, and their Samsung win was important,” he added.

He predicted Imagination will continue to lead the sector, particularly if it retains its design wins with Apple. Long term, however, ARM could exert a threat if it can derive advantages from SoCs that use both its CPU and graphics cores, he added.




abraxalito

5/11/2012 12:56 AM EDT

The report raises as many questions as it answers - if ARM's royalty rates are seen as 'too high' (at an average of 4.6cents per chip) then why are MIPS's even higher at 7cents? ISTM the more likely complaint is not the royalties but the up-front licensing costs. Also since ARM is doing a good job why would the market need a 'strong alternative'? Isn't the market as a whole better served by having one relatively benign player and thereby having standardization?

Sign in to Reply



TingLu

5/12/2012 6:19 PM EDT

ARM royalty is low due to its extreme high volume Micro Controller Cortex-Mx series. MIPS didn't have this line. I'm wondering what is ARM royalty of their Cortex-Ax and Cortex-Rx series.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)