datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


hm

6/9/2012 7:38 PM EDT

SpaceX is very good. Team work is good for continued effort and success of all ...

More...



george.leopold

6/8/2012 9:04 AM EDT

The massive amount of money spent on the ISS primarily as a destination for the ...

More...

SpaceX and space politics

George Leopold

6/6/2012 5:42 PM EDT


WASHINGTON -- As if another example were needed, here’s the latest illustration of why Washington is dysfunctional.

There was great rejoicing last week over the highly successful commercial space mission to the International Space Station. The successful docking of a cargo ship designed and launched by Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, was a great advance in terms of maintaining U.S. access to low-Earth orbit. It was a bit of good news amid the steady stream of bad economic news and man’s inhumanity toward his fellow man and women.

Now, a pissing match has erupted over who should get the political credit for the success of the SpaceX mission.

The commercial cargo and crew program under which SpaceX and other competitors operate was created, according to the chairman of the House Science Committee’s space panel, by the Bush administration in 2005. Congress authorized funding for the program, and SpaceX received its contract the following year.

Good for the Bush administration, which did not fund a successor to the space shuttle, and the Congress. Point for them.

At a hearing on Wednesday (June 6), space panel chairman Steven Palazzo, attacked the Obama administration for taking credit last week for the success of the SpaceX mission. Palazzo charged that John Holden, the White House science advisor, made “misleading” statements in claiming credit for the successful test flight.

We’ve got some news for the petty politicians: The credit for the success of the SpaceX first test flight goes to the engineers, designers, technicians, code jockeys, metal benders and managers at SpaceX along with NASA program administrators. If not for the months of testing and retesting, weeks of painstaking validation of the software code needed for spacecraft navigation and communications with the space station, this test flight would not have achieved all of its goals.

SpaceX and its visionary founder Elon Musk did what they set out to do. The politicians who control NASA’s budget and profess support for commercial space should drop the partisan crap and provide the funding necessary to build on the success of the first commercial flight to the space station.




DigitalAutomation

6/6/2012 8:05 PM EDT

Right on, George! I'd simply add that we need more than one successful commercial carrier/visionary in the space business. So let's not forget Bigelow, Orbital Sciences, Sierra Nevada, Virgin Galactic and others who, like SpaceX, struggle to help us realize our space-based dreams.

Sign in to Reply



george.leopold

6/6/2012 8:29 PM EDT

The more competition the better. Especially competition for the cost-plus contractors, Lockheed Martin and Boeing. If nothing else, SpaceX has shown that that model is unsustainable. The key here is to get to $1K/pound launched. Then they've got something.

Sign in to Reply



DanielRavenNest

6/6/2012 8:14 PM EDT

Congress can take credit for writing the checks. That's it.

Sign in to Reply



george.leopold

6/6/2012 8:29 PM EDT

Yep, and we supply the funds, every work day.

Sign in to Reply



AmerimanWrwhiteal

6/7/2012 9:25 PM EDT

For the 40 years since Apollo.. taxpayers have supplied pork driven Nasa $500 billion for it's US manned space monopoly.. which Nasa blew on the $1.5 billion/flight boondoggle shuttle, the useless $160 billion ISS, and $20 billion wasted on the failed/canceled Constellation...

Private enterprise like SpaceX could have had lunar colonies, Americans on Mars, true affordable space access for 10% of that money.

Sign in to Reply



george.leopold

6/8/2012 9:04 AM EDT

The massive amount of money spent on the ISS primarily as a destination for the space shuttle should have been spent on either a replacement for the good old Saturn V or to see a commercial space industry that doesn't have a "cost-plus" business strategy. After all the billions spent going nowhere, it looks like we are finally doing what we should have done in the 1970s. The problem, of course, is that we are broke.

Sign in to Reply



dylan.mcgrath

6/7/2012 11:30 AM EDT

This is so typical of the state of U.S. politics--scrambling to claim credit for the work of others.

Sign in to Reply



Sparky_Watt

6/7/2012 7:47 PM EDT

It is not just the US, and it is not just politics. Nobody seems to be able to pat someone else on the back anymore.

Sign in to Reply



hm

6/9/2012 7:38 PM EDT

SpaceX is very good. Team work is good for continued effort and success of all programs. It also happens with changing political parties. Is it necessary and important to find out who should get credit?

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)