News & Analysis
Comment
docdivakar
@goafrit: I am also a bit surprised by this. It could be that Intel may be ...
docdivakar
It is a tough call to demarcate IDC as whether it is a non-practicing entity ...
Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
Bolaji Ojo
6/18/2012 6:30 PM EDT
PHILADELPHIA--The tussle for domination in the wireless communication market intensifies today with an announcement from Intel Corp. that it has agreed to purchase about 1,700 "patents and patent applications" related to key technologies in the segment from intellectual property developer InterDigital Communications Corp.
Intel, the world's No. 1 semiconductor vendor by sales, said it will pay $375 million for the portfolio, which the companies in a statement said is "related to 3G, LTE and 802.11 technologies." IN the statement, InterDigital described itself as "an active developer of advanced wireless technologies including WCDMA (Wideband CDMA), HSDPA (High Speed Download Packet Access) and HSUPA (High Speed Upload Packet Access) 3G technologies as well as LTE (Long Term Evolution) and LTE-Advanced 4G technologies." These technologies form the core of latest advances in wireless communication and are being currently deployed across multiple platforms in handsets and tablet computing.
InterDigital gains validation of its business model with the transaction and secures additional cash resources to finance R&D efforts in other market segments. Its stock price shot up almost 30 percent on the news to $29.40 from the closing price of $22.88 on Friday, boosting the market value to $1.3 billion. InterDigital said the sales is a part of its plans to broaden operations "to include patent sales, licensing partnerships and other possibilities," according to Scott McQuilkin, senior executive vice president, strategy and finance at InterDigital, in the published statement.
The company had been seeking to sell itself but failed previously to secure a buyer due to stagnating sales and declining profits. It has now evolved that strategy to include a piecemeal sale of assets and the Intel transaction represents a validation of the new focus. InterDigital said it still has other IP portfolio available for sale. The assets being acquired by Intel "involves a small portion of our overall portfolio," McQuilkin said.
This transaction adds to the IP resources Intel has amassed as it forges ahead with plans to play a bigger role in the wireless communications market, an area where the company has in the past poured massive amount of money via acquisitions. It is expected that the InterDigital deal will strengthen its hands in the smartphone and tablet PC markets where Intel has been seeking a role for years but only succeeded in scoring recent design wins with wireless handset vendors.
"These patents will support Intel's strategic investments in the mobile segment," said Doug Melamed, Intel senior vice president and General Counsel. "The addition of these patents expands our already large, strong and diverse portfolio of intellectual property."
Bolaji Ojo is editor-in-chief of EBN, an EE Times sister site. This article originally appeared on EBN.


goafrit
6/18/2012 8:49 PM EDT
-Intel, the world's No. 1 semiconductor vendor by sales, said it will pay $375 million for the portfolio, which the companies in a statement said is "related to 3G, LTE and 802.11 technologies."
Why is Intel spending this much for a technology that is largely common? I do not think this is a good investment from Intel
Sign in to Reply
Simon7382
6/20/2012 5:47 PM EDT
Patents on "common", i.e. widely used, technologies are the most valuable ones from a litigation perspective (whether they plan to play offense or defense). Intel seems to know what it is doing here. I am considering increasing my existing investment in Intel stock.
Sign in to Reply
unknown multiplier
6/20/2012 9:15 PM EDT
But this technology has probably already been licensed for at least five years now.
Sign in to Reply
eewiz
6/21/2012 12:00 AM EDT
yup. Interdigital has been going after almost all wireless/mobile/chip companies to get them to license. And most of them did. That further reduces the value of these patents
Sign in to Reply
docdivakar
6/25/2012 3:56 PM EDT
@goafrit: I am also a bit surprised by this. It could be that Intel may be designing wireless Silicon that can use the IP acquired from IDC.
MP Divakar
Sign in to Reply
hm
6/18/2012 9:27 PM EDT
How long this patent will be relevant? Innovation and research are always in motion. This may not provide Intel with much value.
Sign in to Reply
resistion
6/19/2012 1:05 AM EDT
This is a really low valuation. Less than a quarter million per patent? Not even licensing, but complete purchase.
Sign in to Reply
resistion
6/20/2012 9:02 PM EDT
A valuation I had typically expected:
http://www.moosedog.fi/2011/07/nortel-portfolio-sold-average-price-350k-per-patent/
Sign in to Reply
unknown multiplier
6/20/2012 9:17 PM EDT
Low valuation could be from it being not so "hot" technology. That may also be why InterDigital was ok to part with it rather easily.
Sign in to Reply
Robotics Developer
6/19/2012 10:02 PM EDT
It makes me wonder if there is more to the purchase than is being reported. I have to agree that 3G is not the latest to the party technology and question if Intel really needed that or if they really bought it as part of a bundled larger portfolio purchase.
Sign in to Reply
eewiz
6/20/2012 1:54 AM EDT
Intel buying patents from patent troll!! Are they planning to troll others with these patents? If not they could simply get a license much cheaper than 375 mil.
Sign in to Reply
double-o-nothing
6/20/2012 8:54 PM EDT
USPTO search shows 1446 patents assigned to interdigital and 2282 applications (including those already granted). Assuming most of the 1700 are patents, it seems interdigital would have very little to offer after this purchase.
I suppose when a company is offering its patents for sale instead of licensing, it means its own self-valuation of those patents is already quite low, or else it is in a hurry to raise cash.
Sign in to Reply
docdivakar
6/24/2012 9:13 PM EDT
It is a tough call to demarcate IDC as whether it is a non-practicing entity (NPE) or a practicing the art as many products companies do. NPE is solely for the purpose of licensing and NOT for practicing the art. NPE's motivation comes from litigating the IP! NPEs are NOT for transferring the technology!
I hope the proceeds from the sale of the IP will let IDC become a practicing entity!
MP Divakar
Sign in to Reply