datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


Eric Verhulst_Altreonic

7/27/2012 3:09 PM EDT

Because people are reluctant (or not capable) of converting their old binaries. ...

More...



xorbit

6/20/2012 10:13 AM EDT

Care to explain why not? If you can get a part that's faster, takes less code ...

More...

Ultra-low-power 32-bit ARM core debuts

R Colin Johnson

6/19/2012 12:01 AM EDT

SAN ANTONIO—Freescale Semiconductor Inc. is sampling the industry's first microcontroller to use ARM's ultra-low-power Cortex-M0+ processor, which aims to convert 8- and 16-bit applications to 32-bit status by offering one-third the energy consumption of 8-bit processors while delivering twice the performance of a 16-bit processor.

"The plus of our new Cortex M0+ is really a minus as far as power is concerned," said Warren East, ARM's chief executive officer. "We worked with Freescale to design a core that could extend the battery life of mobile applications the way an 8-bit microcontroller does, but while delivering the 32-bit performance people expect from ARM."

NXP is also a licensee for the Cortex-M0+ announced in March, but Freescale claims its Kinetis L series is sampling first, making it the "world’s most energy-efficient microcontroller," according to Freescale CEO Gregg Lowe, who will demonstrate it Tuesday (June 19) during his keynote presentation at the annual Freescale Technology Forum here.

Designed for machine-to-machine "Internet of things" applications, the Kinetis L series now offers power consumption as low as 50 microAmps per megahertz, enabling even very small batteries to last for months or years when combined with intelligent power management functions.


The ARM Cortex-M0+ processor includes a variety of bells and whistles in addition to the industries lowest power consumption for a 32-bit processor.






loptide

6/19/2012 11:58 AM EDT

Looking forward to more low-cost ARM micros. However, the M0 just will not displace many 8-bitters.

Sign in to Reply



xorbit

6/20/2012 10:13 AM EDT

Care to explain why not? If you can get a part that's faster, takes less code space, has a clean architecture and uses less power for the same price why wouldn't you?

Sign in to Reply



Eric Verhulst_Altreonic

7/27/2012 3:09 PM EDT

Because people are reluctant (or not capable) of converting their old binaries. I heard the story too often.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)