datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


Battar

6/26/2012 2:18 AM EDT

I'll tell you the biggest challange. It's stopping idiot reporters from creating ...

More...



rick.merritt

6/25/2012 1:22 AM EDT

Yes, Freescale, TI and LSI are all long time vendors to base stations and are ...

More...

Small cells still not ready for mobile prime time

Rick Merritt

6/22/2012 12:27 PM EDT

SAN FRANCISCO – Engineers still have significant work ahead to deliver small cell base stations, a key piece of the puzzle for easing congestion on heavily loaded mobile data networks.

Powerwave Technologies (Santa Ana, Calif.) showed what it claimed was one of the first shipping small cell base stations at the NGMN Alliance conference here recently (below, left). Although it is being used in a small-cell network for a U.S. government department, the small cells do not yet interoperate with traditional macro base stations.

So far the traditional base station suppliers have not disclosed details of their X2 interconnects that companies such as Powerwave need to link to the macro cells. Release 10 of Long Term Evolution specifies an inter-cell interference mitigation standard over X2, but operators are not expected to start deploying Release 10 until sometime in 2013.

Qualcomm showed a demo at the event of the inter-cell interference technology working on prototype chip sets installed in base stations at its San Diego headquarters. It did not say when those chip sets will ship.

The amount of cellular coverage area subject to inter-cell interference grows from 25 percent with macro cells to 40 percent with macro and small cells, said Andrew Jun, vice president of network strategy at cellular operator KT in Korea that has created centralized pools of 144 to 1,000 cell sites.

“This is why we introduced [base station] virtualization” said Jun. “With one location managing multiple cells we could have coordinated transmissions to control interference, especially at the cell edge,” he said.

“It’s only a matter of when” until small and macro cell interoperability is ready, said Khurram Sheikh, chief technologist of Powerwave in a panel session at the event. He claimed his company’s small cells support both LTE and Wi-Fi and can increase an operator’s network capacity fifteen-fold while increasing battery life five-fold.

A carrier can increase its capacity as much as twenty-fold adopting heterogeneous networks of small and macro cells, but only if it pools all its spectrum into one combined 3G and LTE net, said Erik Ekudden, head of technology strategy at Ericsson. Most OEMs are still in the design phase for small cells with field trials starting next year, he added.

For its part, Huawei described at the event a merged LTE and 802.11n Wi-Fi hotspot based on Release 8. It can support downloads at about 1.2 Gbits/second using 256 QAM and is now in a lab prototype based on FPGAs and DSPs, said a Huawei engineer.

“Everybody has nice stuff on their slides, but go try to find a good commercial small cell--I can’t find a single vendor to supply one, said Konstantin Yurganov, chief technology officer at Yota, a 4G supplier in Russia, in a talk at the event.

The carrier has as many as 15 percent of its base stations heavily loaded in some cities with as many as 70 to 160 subscribers on a single base station, he said.

Ultimately, small cells will be deployed both in public areas such as lamp posts and in businesses such as cafes and offices. That’s opening up an opportunity for enterprise networking companies to participate.

In a keynote talk, Paul Mankiewich (right), chief technologist for mobility at Cisco Systems, called for a network API enabling broad virtualization across carrier and business nets. The API could build upon technology already in the works at the Wi-Fi Alliance to help identify traffic on public versus private Wi-Fi hotspots, he said.

“We don’t have coherence between enterprise and service provider networks today,” said Mankiewich. “All that depends on two sets of standards that don’t speak to each other today,” he said.




rick.merritt

6/22/2012 4:56 PM EDT

I'd love to hear from any micro, pico or metro cell system or chip developer about what are your the chief challenges at this point

Sign in to Reply



Battar

6/26/2012 2:18 AM EDT

I'll tell you the biggest challange. It's stopping idiot reporters from creating headlines saying that the antennae are radiating cancer to our children and that the celluar service providers are selling our childrens health for profit. Then the technically illiterate campaign for the base stations to be removed (they still expect heir phones to work though, and don't give a thought to the wifi routers in their bedrooms). Happened in my neighbourhood.

Sign in to Reply



kinnar

6/23/2012 2:52 AM EDT

The interoperability if strictly required between the Service provider and Enterprise wireless devices. May be the evolution of micro cells will provide modular adaptability for both the requirements.

Sign in to Reply



prabhakar_deosthali

6/23/2012 7:44 AM EDT

With the land line network with the 10 digit dialing plan ( 3 digit central office, 3 digit local area and the 4 digit the destination ) , you can dial only the last four digits if calling someone within your local area.

If similar dialing method is adopted for mobile networks as well, ( if a person is sure that the number he is calling is currently in the same cell as his, then the voice traffic can be short circuited and the data traffic overload can be reduced.

Sign in to Reply



eewiz

6/24/2012 10:13 AM EDT

With cell sizes getting smaller and smaller, Is radiation a concern? I hope FCC thoroughly investigates this in the upcoming review!

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-06-15/mobile-phone-radiation-safety-to-be-examined-by-u-dot-s-dot-regulator

Sign in to Reply



DrQuine

6/24/2012 11:06 AM EDT

Don't forget about the need for consumer deployment. Most people have a dead spots in their house and would appreciate a femtocell capability to make the entire house "5 Bar Rated". If one transmitter cannot upgrade the entire house (because of barriers or building materials) then 2 transmitters that can hand off the signal would be the "killer application". Obviously businesses share the same problem.

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

6/25/2012 1:21 AM EDT

Yes, the so-called femto cells have been addressing the home market and are growing rapidly although they are a relatively low margin, high volume business.

Also the femtos are not on the carrier's macro net directly.

Sign in to Reply



goafrit

6/24/2012 3:27 PM EDT

Interesting this is the same approach Freescale is hedging itself as this new EETimes article shows http://eetimes.com/electronics-news/4375993/Freescale-takes-shotgun-approach-to-basestation-SoCS

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

6/25/2012 1:22 AM EDT

Yes, Freescale, TI and LSI are all long time vendors to base stations and are all pursuing in one way or another the new small cell opportunities.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)