datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


docdivakar

6/30/2012 8:40 PM EDT

It is good to see some revenue predictions coming from non-PC chip business for ...

More...



jlredford

6/26/2012 10:15 AM EDT

Does the Intel "Intelligent Systems Group" build something besides Atom ...

More...

Intel may see $2B growth beyond PCs in 2013

Rick Merritt

6/25/2012 1:11 AM EDT

SAN JOSE – Next year, Intel is poised to generate $2 billion in revenues—half its expected revenue growth—from chips outside its traditional PC x86 processors, according to a financial analyst who tracks the company.

With its relatively new embedded, NAND flash and wireless products, “Intel has dramatically outperformed its competition on revenue growth and/or profitability from 2008-2012 and is poised to extend these gains in 2013,” said Ross Seymore, an analyst with Deutsche Bank Equity Research.

“These segments have the potential to generate about 50 percent of the $4 billion revenue growth implied in our 2013 estimates, leaving us more confident in upside potential and Intel's share price,” said Seymore who continues to rate Intel’s stock as a buy.

Specifically, Seymore said revenue for Intel’s Intelligent Systems Group has nearly doubled over the last five years and is poised to top $2 billion in 2012. Its NAND Solution Group revenue has tripled since 2008, and enjoys the best margins in the NAND industry by focusing on high value segments. Intel’s wireless group, still in an early stage, is already a $2 billion business, and the company believes it can grow more than 50 percent in 2013, the analyst said.

The development is arguably a historic milestone for the company. Intel has tried for years to expand beyond the PC market with little success to date. During the dot-com boom in acquired a handful of communications chip companies and even started a data center business, but had to jettison nearly all its plans after the market turned sour.

Intel is not without its risks. The company could see slower than expected PC unit growth, face market share losses to AMD, or see selling prices decline, he noted.




resistion

6/25/2012 1:26 AM EDT

Let's hear it for the silver lining mentality. :)

Seriously, if successful, the non-X86 foundry business could change Intel's entire image, from domineering x86 IDM to very friendly service foundry. Or so I dream..

Sign in to Reply



jane xu

6/25/2012 8:57 AM EDT

Does Intel wireless group include Atom sold into Medfield and upcoming Win 8 tablet, or count only the business acquired mainly from Infineon wireless?

Sign in to Reply



eewiz

6/25/2012 9:31 AM EDT

Atom still uses x86 architecture. So I guess, Intel wireless group is only the infineon wireless

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

6/25/2012 11:27 AM EDT

There is some grey area here.

I am checking with Intel now whether Medfield is part of the same wireless group as the former Infineon baseband chip business.

Separately, Intel's embedded group does include x86-based chips.

So it is better to characterize this as Intel's growth beyond traditional PC markets rather than beyond x86 markets.

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

6/25/2012 7:58 PM EDT

Intel confirms that Medfield, its smartphone applications processor platform, is part of the same wireless group as the former Infineon baseband business.

Right now, I suspect the vast majority of that group's business is from the baseband chips. The x86/Atom-based smartphone processors are just getting their first design wins.

Sign in to Reply



jane xu

6/25/2012 9:48 PM EDT

thank you so much Rick

Sign in to Reply



resistion

6/25/2012 9:52 AM EDT

Some of these non-x86 sectors like NAND and wireless are still linked to the x86 CPU success as they all partake in notebooks, ultra books, etc.

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

6/25/2012 11:35 AM EDT

Good point, they could be additional chips on a PC platform in some cases such as wireless and flash.

Sign in to Reply



TingLu

6/25/2012 4:25 PM EDT

It is unlikely Intel is going to be able to charge $100 for Wireless Application SoC. If they are only going to sell it $10 to $15 and 30-40% margin like other handset SoC vendors, Will this work for Intel business model?

Sign in to Reply



Jason007

6/25/2012 6:07 PM EDT

it will be up to Atom's cost structure and system integration. If Intel can sell soc at $40 with reasonable margin, there be good chance for them to compete with Nvidia and Qualcomm.

Sign in to Reply



jlredford

6/26/2012 10:15 AM EDT

Does the Intel "Intelligent Systems Group" build something besides Atom processors? If not, how is that different than any other x86 business? They also seem to need additional 6 or 7 Series chipsets to supply the normal SoC IO (E.g. HDMI or PCIe). Other SoC providers put these on-chip, so I'm not sure how this is competitive in price, power, or size.

Sign in to Reply



docdivakar

6/30/2012 8:40 PM EDT

It is good to see some revenue predictions coming from non-PC chip business for Intel (after all those communications business acquisitions it made in 2000's). But the article doesn't say what % of the total revenue new business opportunities will the non-PC business bring?

MP Divakar

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)