datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


Sanjib.Acharya

7/19/2012 11:50 AM EDT

Thank you! This clarifies well for my questions.

More...



KenO Microsemi

7/17/2012 10:19 PM EDT

To answer the question about “commercial-grade” parts – yes this can be a ...

More...

Microsemi completes impressive FPGA reliability testing

Nicolas Mokhoff

7/13/2012 2:34 PM EDT

MANHASSET, NY -- Microsemi has announced that an independent organization has tested its commercial-grade FPGAs for more than four years with an accumulated total of more than 26 million device-hours without a single anti-fuse failure.

Microsemi's commercial-grade Axcelerator FPGAs are the commercial equivalent of Microsemi's space-flight RTAX-S/SL FPGAs and share the same CMOS structures, antifuse technology, materials, processing, dimensions and programming attributes, according to Microsemi.

The RTAX-S/SL FPGAs are also radiation-tolerant and include flip-flops protected against radiation-induced upsets by built-in triple-module redundancy.

"The rigorous independent high-performance tests and unprecedented amount of associated reliability data prove that our Axcelerator FPGAs are extremely reliable," said Paul Ekas, vice president of Marketing for SoC products at Microsemi, in a statement.
 
The testing process involved programming parts with a stringent design featuring excellent observability of failure mechanisms prior to the start of the tests. In addition, the tests included a combination of high temperature operating life (HTOL), low temperature operating life (LTOL) and temperature cycle tests.

Microsemi said its RTAX-S/SL radiation-tolerant FPGAs are specifically designed for space applications and are offered in densities of up to 4 million equivalent system gates and 840 user I/Os.

The company recently introduced the first in a new family of octal source driver ICs for aerospace and other high-reliability power electronics control applications including motor control. The new driver can be used in conjunction with Microsemi's radiation-hardened and -tolerant programmable logic products and diodes to easily implement redundant power management solutions.

Microsemi next invitation-only, one-day Space Forum will take place Dec. 4, 2012 in Los Angeles.





Sanjib.Acharya

7/15/2012 12:00 AM EDT

The phrase "commercial-grade" is a bit confusing. Generally "commercial-grade" and "industrial-grade" for the FPGAs denote the operating temperature range of 0 to 60degC and (-40) to (+85) degC respectively, for which FPGA specs are specified. Hope that is not what is meant here?

Sign in to Reply



nicolas.mokhoff

7/15/2012 7:16 PM EDT

Sanjib.Acharya: I think the point is that the commercial-grade parts passed the rigorous lifetime tests that are usually reserved for military/space equivalent parts.

Sign in to Reply



hm

7/15/2012 8:08 PM EDT

This is very interesting. However, it is nice if it it list all tests conducted and its conditions. Also, how does this FITS compare with FGPA from other vendors?

Sign in to Reply



KenO Microsemi

7/17/2012 10:18 PM EDT

Thanks for the comments. Hopefully I can address the questions raised.

Firstly, regarding the tests conducted and their conditions. The parts being tested were divided into three groups. The first group (277 parts) was operated in a high temperature operating life test (case temp ~ 85degC), the second group (272 parts) was operated in a low temperature operating life test (ambient temp ~ -55degC), and the third group (182 parts) was exposed to a temperature cycle test in which parts operated alternately at 85degC and -55degC. In each case, prior to testing, the parts were programmed with a complex design which has very high sensitivity to small timing changes which could indicate changes to the impedance of the programmable interconnect elements over time. The fact that no timing changes were observed over the extremely long duration and harsh conditions of the testing indicates that the programmable interconnect elements are extremely robust and suitable for the most demanding of high-reliability applications.

This set of tests exposed parts to test conditions for over 4 years. For comparison, the high temperature operating life test required for qualification to Mil Std 883 class B is 1,000 hours (6 weeks) at 125 degC. Mil Std 883 class B is often used for qualification of microcircuits intended for terrestrial or airborne military applications. For flight-critical space applications, qualification to QML class V is often required. The life-test requirement for QML class V qualification is up to 6,000 hours (almost 35 weeks). The tests referred to in this news article lasted almost 6 times as long as the most stringent QML class V qualification. This is an unprecedented amount of reliability testing for an FPGA, and probably for any highly-integrated microcircuit.

Sign in to Reply



KenO Microsemi

7/17/2012 10:19 PM EDT

To answer the question about “commercial-grade” parts – yes this can be a confusing point and should be clarified. The term “commercial” is ambiguous – sometimes it is used in its strictest sense, meaning parts that are guaranteed to operate over the commercial temperature range of 0 to 70 degC. However, sometimes engineers working on defense and space systems use the term “commercial” simply to differentiate devices built for non-space applications from devices built for space applications. That is the case in this news article. In these tests, the devices tested were industrial temperature parts – guaranteed to operate over the industrial temperature range of -40 to 85 degC. They were plastic-packaged devices, not built to the same standard as FPGAs intended for space applications – for example they had no radiation mitigation built in, no hermetic packaging, and they were not subjected to Mil Std 883 class B screening, which would have included a dynamic burn-in, temperature cycling, temperature testing at -55degC and 125degC as well as room temp, etc. Microsemi is not suggesting that industrial parts can substitute for space-grade parts in space applications – they cannot because they don’t have radiation mitigation, burn-in, full temperature screening, hermetically-sealed packaging, etc. The point is that since the industrial parts use identical programmable interconnect elements as the space parts, they served very well as a cost-effective alternative to the space version for the purpose of these reliability tests.

Sign in to Reply



Sanjib.Acharya

7/19/2012 11:50 AM EDT

Thank you! This clarifies well for my questions.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)