datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


resistion

8/18/2012 11:48 PM EDT

Best if neither product is banned, just some monetary settlement, maybe even ...

More...



resistion

8/18/2012 8:35 PM EDT

Interesting USPTO not involved or at least not mentioned.

More...

Judge scolds Apple, Samsung as decision nears

Rick Merritt

8/16/2012 7:53 PM EDT


SAN JOSE, Calif. – Apple and Samsung lawyers both got a dressing down from Judge Lucy Koh as the clock ran down on their high-profile patent infringement case here.

In the morning session, Koh chided Apple attorneys for sending her a 75-page briefing on 20 outstanding witnesses. “Unless you're smoking crack, you know these witnesses aren't going to be called when you have less than four hours," Koh said, according to an online report.

Koh has limited both sides to 25 hours in front of the jury. Both have used up the majority of that time, with Koh pressing them to finish testimony by the end of the week.

Samsung has used up more of its time than Apple, much of it in cross-examining Apple’s witnesses. The Korean giant rested its case that Apple infringes five of its patents today, then declined to cross-examined several Apple witnesses who claimed those patents were invalid.

“Samsung made a strategic decision to spend more time cross-examining Apple’s witnesses than Apple used to present its case,” Koh said, noting Samsung spent about 14 hours in cross exams.

“You have to make a calculation and be disciplined…so I don’t find Samsung was prevented from bringing in witnesses,” she added.

Apple has just less than four hours to finish its rebuttal case; Samsung has about 45 minutes left on its clock. The companies are expected to make closing arguments Tuesday.

In the afternoon, Apple called university professors who testified Apple did not infringe four of the patents Samsung used in its case. They also argued those patents were invalid citing earlier patents and handsets that used similar approaches.

In addition, Apple’s vice president of procurement testified briefly that it buys the cellular baseband chips used in most iPhones and iPads for Intel at prices ranging from $7 to $12. Samsung said Apple should pay it royalties on its 3G patents used in those chips of up to 2.75 percent of the sales price of the handsets and tablets or about $430 million.




Sheetal.Pandey

8/17/2012 7:08 AM EDT

guess Apple will win...

Sign in to Reply



patrick38

8/17/2012 7:48 AM EDT

I don't know who is going to win but it is more something close to school playground than really the level where such big companies should be. Whatever the end I personally beleive that damages will be big on both side and I think it will higher for Apple. they will just demonstrate that the world is good as long as Apple can drive it. I don't like this world, richness always come from diversity and competition!!!

Sign in to Reply



daleste

8/17/2012 10:09 PM EDT

In the end, the loser will be the customers. When a company loses a law suit, the lose is passed on to the customer. We will all lose and Apple and Samsung will go on like nothing happened.

Sign in to Reply



resistion

8/18/2012 11:48 PM EDT

Best if neither product is banned, just some monetary settlement, maybe even cross-licensing.

Sign in to Reply



seaEE

8/17/2012 11:33 PM EDT

“Unless you're smoking crack, you know these witnesses aren't going to be called when you have less than four hours,"

Tell us how you really feel, Justice Koh!

Sign in to Reply



resistion

8/18/2012 8:35 PM EDT

Interesting USPTO not involved or at least not mentioned.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)