News & Analysis
Slideshow: The Apple/Samsung verdict form
Rick Merritt
8/27/2012 1:34 AM EDT
The $2.2 million mistake
Once Judge Lucy Koh explained the mistakes to the jury, they quickly zeroed out the related damages of about $2.2 million. Not everyday does one make a $2.2 million mistake, but when you are working on a $2.7 billion case, I guess it doesn't seem like such a big deal.
Apparently, the jury had made two other errors in its calculations as well, as shown on the form directly below. At bottom, the final jury award to Apple as amended.
Click on image to enlarge.
Click on image to enlarge.
Once Judge Lucy Koh explained the mistakes to the jury, they quickly zeroed out the related damages of about $2.2 million. Not everyday does one make a $2.2 million mistake, but when you are working on a $2.7 billion case, I guess it doesn't seem like such a big deal.
Apparently, the jury had made two other errors in its calculations as well, as shown on the form directly below. At bottom, the final jury award to Apple as amended.
Click on image to enlarge.
Click on image to enlarge.
|
|
|
|
|
Navigate to related information
I_B_GREEN
8/29/2012 7:54 PM EDT
2.2/1000 = 0.22%...noise
Sign in to Reply
ChristianDenmark
8/31/2012 3:53 AM EDT
I wonder if this is the full form. In the article it says 24 products, and above is 25 products.
Howevet the above form adds to $ 955.426.209 and NOT $ 1.049.393.540.
I assume the jury added correctly, so where can I find the complete and filled out verdict-form?
Sign in to Reply
ChristianDenmark
8/31/2012 4:01 AM EDT
If Apple really has patens on pinch-tozoom, why does the standard Galaxy SII add to $ 0 in damages?
Sign in to Reply