News & Analysis
Finally, a hardware accelerator: Bolt's Ben Einstein on a leg up for startups
Suzanne Deffree
8/27/2012 9:14 AM EDT
Experienced product designer and entrepreneur Ben Einstein is part of a team in Boston looking to give hardware startups their fair share of the glory. Bolt, a new accelerator program that Einstein cofounded, aims to be a tool kit for hardware start-ups rather than for software and Web-services companies—popular draws for talent and investment that in the current environment have more support at their disposal. Einstein recently spoke to EDN about what Bolt is, what types of young companies it is looking for, and why the focus is on hardware.
Tell us what Bolt is all about.
A: We focus on the startup community. We’re basically an accelerator program designed to help hardware companies. The general premise is that if you are building a software company, there are so many resources available that are incredibly useful—software review, mentoring programs—and raising money is often fairly easy because there is so much awareness and popularity in the space. Bolt is explicitly built from the ground up to do similar things, but for hardware companies.

Bolt's Ben Einstein
We have prototyping facilities and a full-time engineering staff; we help people go to Asia for manufacturing and tooling; we know how to talk to buyers. We have an open application process; anyone from anywhere in the world can apply. We will accept between 10 and 12 teams every six months and give them a little seed capital to help keep them alive.
Why focus on physical products as opposed to software or an app?
A: There are maybe 150 [support programs] for software in the US [alone]. And there’s this device phenomenon that is about to explode. [The targeted] companies act like software companies in terms of their revenue structure, the kinds of founders they attract, the way the IP is locked up, but they tend to have a piece of hardware that is sort of a barrier to entry.
There’s a phrase that is thrown around, “software wrapped in plastic,” which is what some of these companies begin to look like. They have a relatively simple piece of hardware, but it ends up enabling a new set of functionality and user applications [so that they] work like software companies; they have reoccurring revenue streams, multiple products around one piece of hardware, and reoccurring interactions with customers.
There’s also [the fact that] these hardware companies aren’t being helped at all. It’s very difficult for some of these young companies to get the tools and systems they need to get to market, whereas in the app world a lot of that is pretty easy to come by. We are trying to leverage that.
Doing manufacturing isn't necessarily hard, but a lot of people that these young companies are approaching for advice are not the people who know how to make hardware, and that makes it more frustrating for them.
What are you looking for?
A: Great teams, but we are really looking for great people. The [online] application is tailored to find teams of great people. It’s really simple; it’s not designed to be a business plan.
You are obviously big on prototyping, then.
A: Of course.
When it comes to prototyping, what can an entrepreneurial engineer learn from a company like Dyson or iRobot or other former start-ups that showed distinct, difficult, or maybe risky designs in their beginnings?
A: That's one of these unfortunate things in the product-development world—these phantom or ghost products that wind up being showcased in some sort of great way for design but never end up making it to production. Dyson is very good with that; they are one of the companies that demonstrated a lot of their prototypes.
Bolt is based on building markets and helping people find their way along the path of building a product. It’s less about the sexy, sleek prototype that people are really attracted to. The MVP— minimum viable product—approach involves doing as little as possible to prove that somebody really likes what you are doing. It’s part of the lean start-up movement ... and involves growing the company around a core group of users and satisfying that need.
We take a similar approach when building products. When it comes to actual physical prototyping, we do a pretty significant amount of that and have an in-house prototyping facility, so people can assemble and tweak as needed.
What are your thoughts on 3-D printers?
A: 3-D printers are great. They’ve fallen dramatically in price in the last decade. They are unbelievably useful for certain things, but they are a little oversold. We use [the 3-D printer] as a fantastic tool for rapid prototype development, but it’s not [yet the] fantastic tool for production of millions of units of things that people say it may be one day. It may be one day, but the technology really doesn’t exist yet to be even close to cost-competitive with injection molding or other high-end volume production techniques.
When people think about startups, they think about twenty-somethings just out of school. Do you see opportunities for more experienced engineers?
A: We expect a good portion of our applicants to be in that [younger] category. But the other category is the frustrated engineers who are at a company like Apple or Motorola and have sort of been in their middle position and chugging along but feel that they want to be more creative and try out their own concept. Those [engineers] are really attractive to us. The only trick is that we are not providing enough capital to provide for families when the business is getting started. They have to be able to basically survive on their own for six months or so.
We expect that a smaller pool of the applicants would be these kinds of guys, but we encourage them to apply. You have to have a certain kind of crazy to start a company, especially in hardware, and that tends to be beaten out of people as they get older. But their experience [can be] incredibly valuable. Even if they are not leading the charge, it’s great to have them on a team with two or three younger guys.

Einstein will be presenting
at next month’s Design East
conference, hosted by UBM.
Register and get more
information at http://east.ubmdesign.com.


betajet
8/27/2012 10:42 AM EDT
I think the biggest hurdle for any hardware start-up is certification: FCC, UL, CE, Canadian, etc. Certification is very expensive and requires experience to get through the first time. It's no big deal if you're a large company with lots of experience and large volumes. But it can represent a huge expense for a start-up, and the time it takes can be enough to miss the market window, especially if it takes multiple iterations.
Sign in to Reply
goafrit
9/1/2012 9:26 AM EDT
It is when you move into some special industries that you have to worry about that. Medical is risky. Defense is a no go area. But consumer, that is still a game.
Sign in to Reply
kinnar
8/28/2012 7:02 AM EDT
It seems that some remarkable unseen never thought product is about to be developed, electronics really requires this kind of initiative for out of box thinking and products.
Sign in to Reply
Robotics Developer
8/28/2012 5:44 PM EDT
I have thought about starting a hardware company but the initial costs always seemed to be a significant barrier, this hardware accelerator concept is a great one! I wonder if they have considered including as part of the package some shared licenses for tools: schematic capture, PCB layout, simulation, etc. Another thought would be a shared resource pool of prototype services such as PCB layout/fabrication, assembly, test, case design and mold creation. There are a lot of possible creative people that given some funding and services support could be viable start-up candidates. Here is hoping this goes well.
Sign in to Reply
goafrit
9/1/2012 9:25 AM EDT
Wow - this is very nice. I hope the VCs will come onboard. I have expected this with the disappointment everyone is seeing in the social media universe.
Sign in to Reply