News & Analysis
Comment
I_B_GREEN
Frank Rayal
The article is very broad and addresses a number of issues that have been ...
Call for consensus on small cell base stations
Rick Merritt
10/3/2012 4:12 PM EDT
SAN JOSE, Calif.--Wireless carriers know they need a new tier of small cell base stations to keep pace with the explosive growth in mobile data. But they are still working toward a clear consensus on issues such as how they will be deployed and interact with the rest of the cellular network.
That’s the view of Gordon Mansfield, the new chairman of the Small Cell Forum. Mansfield has a keen view of what carriers need because he is one as executive director of small cell solutions and radio access network delivery at AT&T Mobility.
[Get a 10% discount on ARM TechCon 2012 conference passes by using promo code EDIT. Click here to learn about the show and register.]
"We have to get consensus in the operator community about what we need [in small cells], and we are very close--then we need to get the full [vendor] ecosystem behind it," said Mansfield in an interview with EE Times.
Small cells consist of at least three classes of new systems emerging beneath the traditional boxes now dubbed macro base stations. Mansfield splits small cells into three buckets:
Carriers have conducted separate trials of 3G and LTE small cells with generally favorable results. Next year they start hybrid trials that mix 3G, LTE and Wi-Fi systems.
"That’s when we will start to assess if its manageable to put these systems together given we have largely solved the LTE and 3G issues separately. I personally think the answer to that question is yes," he said.
The trials seek optimal ways to reduce interference and link the small cells to the macro base station networks.
The Forum also aims to help provide clarity about how the small cells will link to core networks. A wide variety of so-called backhaul options are currently in use including fibre optic links, dedicated and best-efforts Ethernet, multiple classes of microwave connections and even Wi-Fi.
Carriers also face regulatory issues as they seek approvals to place them from everyone from corner café owners to federal governments. Issues are sometimes as basic "as powering boxes in locations where you want them," Mansfield said.
The creation of the Small Cell Forum mirrors the growing awareness of the need for expanded cellular networks. The group was established in 2007 as the Femto Forum, but changed its name in February, indicating its expanded mission.
Mansfield joined as chairman in mid September, when the group also named a full time executive director and a new board with members from companies including Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco Systems, Ericsson, Nokia Siemens Networks, Qualcomm, Softbank and Vodafone. The Forum has more than 140 members, including 67 operators representing more than 2.92 billion mobile subscribers, nearly half the global total.
Related stories:
That’s the view of Gordon Mansfield, the new chairman of the Small Cell Forum. Mansfield has a keen view of what carriers need because he is one as executive director of small cell solutions and radio access network delivery at AT&T Mobility.
[Get a 10% discount on ARM TechCon 2012 conference passes by using promo code EDIT. Click here to learn about the show and register.]
"We have to get consensus in the operator community about what we need [in small cells], and we are very close--then we need to get the full [vendor] ecosystem behind it," said Mansfield in an interview with EE Times.
Small cells consist of at least three classes of new systems emerging beneath the traditional boxes now dubbed macro base stations. Mansfield splits small cells into three buckets:
- Femto cells consume roughly 250 milliwatts and serve about four residential users.
- Pico cells consume 1W, serve 16-64 users and are typically placed indoors.
- Micro cells consume about 5W, serve hundreds of users and are generally placed outdoors.
Carriers have conducted separate trials of 3G and LTE small cells with generally favorable results. Next year they start hybrid trials that mix 3G, LTE and Wi-Fi systems.
"That’s when we will start to assess if its manageable to put these systems together given we have largely solved the LTE and 3G issues separately. I personally think the answer to that question is yes," he said.The trials seek optimal ways to reduce interference and link the small cells to the macro base station networks.
The Forum also aims to help provide clarity about how the small cells will link to core networks. A wide variety of so-called backhaul options are currently in use including fibre optic links, dedicated and best-efforts Ethernet, multiple classes of microwave connections and even Wi-Fi.
Carriers also face regulatory issues as they seek approvals to place them from everyone from corner café owners to federal governments. Issues are sometimes as basic "as powering boxes in locations where you want them," Mansfield said.
The creation of the Small Cell Forum mirrors the growing awareness of the need for expanded cellular networks. The group was established in 2007 as the Femto Forum, but changed its name in February, indicating its expanded mission.
Mansfield joined as chairman in mid September, when the group also named a full time executive director and a new board with members from companies including Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco Systems, Ericsson, Nokia Siemens Networks, Qualcomm, Softbank and Vodafone. The Forum has more than 140 members, including 67 operators representing more than 2.92 billion mobile subscribers, nearly half the global total.
Related stories:
|
|
|
|
|
Navigate to related information
rick.merritt
10/4/2012 2:49 AM EDT
What do you see on the horizon for small cells?
Sign in to Reply
GREAT-Terry
10/6/2012 12:03 AM EDT
Will there be a standard for small cells? I wonder how difficult it is to make all 140 members to agree on a particular standards.
Sign in to Reply
Frank Rayal
10/7/2012 5:02 PM EDT
The article is very broad and addresses a number of issues that have been on-going withing the industry. For example, they have already developed a standard for 3G femto cells (indoor; connected through 3rd party backhaul to operator's network). For outdoor cells, the interface can be the same as that of any other type of cell. There's also the issue of coordination with macrocells which is a feature of LTE Release 10. I think the critical part will be tackling the logistical issues to deploy small cells in large numbers and this is a tricky issue as it varies significantly depending on municipality. Another issue is ensuring low cost for small cell deployments... For more information, see: http://frankrayal.com/small-cells-backhaul/
Sign in to Reply
I_B_GREEN
10/8/2012 8:29 PM EDT
What about Wifi 802.11AE?
Will this solve the interoperability and timing issues of pico cell vs main macro cells?
Sign in to Reply