datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

ISSCC preview: Revving ReRAMS, boosting memory bandwidth

Brian Fuller

11/19/2012 9:05 AM EST

SAN FRANCISCO--Relentless scaling advances will highlight memory papers at February's International Solid State Circuits Conference here, but it may be break-throughs in off-beat memory architectures that raise a few eyebrows.

ISSCC, scheduled for Feb. 17-21, 2013 at the Marriott, features a slightly smaller percentage of memory papers than usual for the five-day affair (9 percent of the total is down from 10 percent this year and 10 pecent in 2011), but the topics are no less fascinating.

Memory subcommittee chair Kevin Zhang of Intel notes in his memory overview, "We continue to see progressive scaling in embedded SRAM, DRAM, and floating-gate based Flash for very broad applications. However, due to the major scaling challenges in all mainstream memory technologies, we see a continued increase in the use of smart algorithms and error-correction techniques to compensate for increased
device variability."

 

Memory capacity trend of emerging nonvolatile memories

However, "Emerging memory technologies are making steady progress towards product introductions, including PCRAM and ReRAM, while STT-MRAM is beginning to become a strong candidate for both standalone and embedded applications."

Revving ReRAM
One of the standout papers for the memory sessions comes from Toshiba and Sandisk, who will describe a 32Gb ReRAM (Resistive random-access memory) test chip developed in 24nm process, with a diode as the selection device.

The allure of alternative non-volatile memories has been high cycling capability and lower power per bit in read/write but their densities don't compete with NAND flash. ISSCC organizers noted that the highest density for a single chip published at last year’s ISSCC is 64Mb for ReRAM and 8Gb for PRAM, while NAND can reach up to 128Gb.

The Sandisk-Toshiba test chip is a metal-oxide-based ReRAM is based on 24nm technology node with a diode as the selection device and a 2-layered architecture. Apparently as part of the stacking, a number of circuits are tucked under the array, including the selection transistor or decoder, bias-control circuit,
sense amplifier, page buffer, read/write control circuit and voltage regulator drivers, improving the array efficiency, according to a preview of the paper.




John_Galt

11/20/2012 10:30 AM EST

I would be interesting to see cost-per-bit targets for the various non-volatile technologies.

Sign in to Reply



resistion

11/20/2012 8:18 PM EST

Brian, is your information from a press kit? Is it publicly available? I could not view abstracts from the advance program. Thanks.

Sign in to Reply



Brian Fuller2

11/21/2012 10:22 AM EST

@resistion, here's a link to the advanced program:

http://www.miracd.com/ISSCC2013/PDF/ISSCC2013AdvanceProgram.pdf

I'll see if I can get access for the press materials for you folks, which has some more detail but is gated right now.

Sign in to Reply



kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc

11/22/2012 7:54 AM EST

its just a comment you understand but theres something very wrong here, it seems all these are test chips fresh out the lab, now thats good.

don't get me wrong, but people are fed up now always hearing whats perpetually always in the lad or test chip, and for no other reason than its here "last year’s ISSCC is 64Mb for ReRAM and 8Gb for PRAM"

theres also mention of smaller future processes and how thats good 16nm,22nm,24nm etc

however where are the commercial products Today, and why didn't F RAM get a mention here ?

or Especially Mram gets only "making steady progress towards product introductions..." when

http://semiaccurate.com/2012/11/16/everspin-makes-st-mram-a-reality/

after talking with everspin on the phone directly states something far better , it's commercially available "NOW", "The ST-MRAM shown today is built on a standard 90nm process, and from that you get a 64Mb chip that is pin compatible with a DDR3 DRAM."

"Current DDR3 controllers, if they follow the spec fully, should be able to work with ST-MRAM."

"Looking forward a bit, if you can get 64Mb chips out of a 90nm process, think about what happens when you move to a modern process. Process"

and he finishes with best of all
"Impending shrinks mean ST-MRAM has a pretty good outlook. Once this technology goes mainstream it will change things, count on it.S|A"

so all told, finally we get this new (well old given Freescale commercialized oddball versions of this 2004 before passing it to everspin) fast as current Dram packages, in a cheap and generic 90nm process with lots of very quick progression to something even better Now, today,in stock,commercially,and so retail real soon now (in the real meaning of the end user word...)

like i said only wanted to make a comment, sorry for the tangent but you and everyone should be screaming this from all the front pages so people buy...

Sign in to Reply



resistion

11/24/2012 10:35 AM EST

But why would commercialized stuff, already well-researched, be talked about at research conferences?

Sign in to Reply



resistion

11/24/2012 10:40 AM EST

If MRAM or FRAM want to grow their niches, research might be the last thing they want to associate with.

Sign in to Reply



kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc

11/25/2012 10:45 AM EST

i don't know perhaps the same reason antiquated limited write NAND Flash is still being researched
and talked about at research conferences?

and OC i don't recall it being said saying anything about it being "well-researched" only that its now a commercial product in a form people might use generally.

just because a produce is commercialized doesn't stop it being researched to bring improvements,NAND Flash proves that.

Sign in to Reply



resistion

11/25/2012 1:11 PM EST

NAND is commercialized, so any talk at the conference is only leading to its demise. However, it is so entrenched, it doesn't need growth, and its demise won't happen overnight. On the other hand, exposing faults of MRAM or FRAM could severely limit their ability to grow their markets, right now.

Sign in to Reply



kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc

11/22/2012 8:24 AM EST

and not to take focus away from MRAM above, theres also the news that samsung just made a 64GB embedded multimedia card (eMMC) using [10nm]-class process technology to also consider http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20121116PR206.html

Sign in to Reply



kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc

11/22/2012 8:29 AM EST

and by that i mean everyone knows antiquated "limited write" NAND Flash SSDs are reaching their limits already and wont go much past their current speeds , its time to transition and everyone put cash into Mram and move move over until the other stuffs finally out the Lab and on the shelfs for real.

Sign in to Reply



resistion

3/14/2013 12:20 PM EDT

It's always been a fundamental question, in a multi-layered memory, with the peripheral portion taking up more and more area, perhaps even initially exceeding the array area, doesn't the cost/bit reduction from additional layers quickly reach its limit, making it questionable to say it extends scalability?

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)