datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Intel's 22-nm tri-gate SoC, how low can you leak?

Sylvie Barak

12/10/2012 4:30 PM EST

Why FinFet is good for analog design

Bohr said it was now abundantly clear that 22-nm tri-gate SoCs outperformed 32-nm planar devices by a margin of 20 to 65 percent, while covering four different orders of magnitude in current leakage.



Intel said its 22-nm tri-gate product also exhibits superior short channel control, with optimum sub-threshold slope and drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL). The sub-threshold slope allows for low leakage but could also function well at low voltage, making them “much better than the very best planar devices," Bohr added.

Bohr said the low numbers for DIBL seen in testing were a measure of good performance in short channel control, with the new SoC pulling in DIBL numbers of 30 to 35mVs, while comparable products had DIBL’s closer to the 100mV range.



Bohr said that when Intel had first announced it would be using tri-gate devices, other companies had argued that FinFET transistors would not aid analog design. “Well, they’re wrong,” declared Bohr.

For analog designers, he asserted, an important transistor metric is trans-conductance by power out (GM x Rout). Bohr said that while this value had been steadily degrading over the past few generations, it had shot up again in 22-nm trigate SoCs, making it easier for analog circuit designers to use than Intel’s previous three generations of planar technology.



Bohr also touted the technology's advanced passive features, including precision resistors, MIM capacitors and high Q inductors.








sranje

12/10/2012 4:58 PM EST

Thank you Sylvie very much !
It would be interesting to hear what will be the impact on IC packaging.... Any information on that? Thanks once again

Sign in to Reply



SylvieBarak

12/10/2012 5:52 PM EST

My pleasure. I don't have any information on how this will affect the packaging just yet, but I'll try to find out for you. Glad you enjoyed the article!

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

12/10/2012 6:40 PM EST

The slide shows leakage getting smaller as the feature size decreases...this can't be true!!!

Sign in to Reply



resistion

12/10/2012 10:39 PM EST

This looks like (at least) a dual gate oxide SoC, so it's definitely more expensive to make than single gate oxide logic. Triple gate oxide is not unheard of either. The gate layer in this case is therefore already triple patterned for non-lithographic, electrical reasons alone.

Sign in to Reply



danny1024

12/11/2012 6:15 PM EST

Everyone who plays/played the "Master of Orion" or the "Civilization" series of global/galactic strategy games knows that "raping the tech tree" is the key to victory. I can't see how that's any different for the semiconductor industry and the process technology tree.

Sign in to Reply



WiLess

12/11/2012 8:10 PM EST

TSMC has an infrastructure and process to enable IP houses to develop analog, memory and other process-specific IP. That way anyone who uses the new process can choose from many offering. That's my understanding why Intel's mobile offerings are so poor-featured compared ARM-based developed by Qualcomm, Samsung and Nvidia. Tri-gate process is a great improvement and the step in the right direction to enable mobile market, but I am not sure if this is sufficient alone. Even if Intel opens its fab to others today, it still has a lot to catch up with the way other fabs are supporting their customers. Thanks for the interesting article!

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)