datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Comment


ReginaldConley

2/13/2013 2:03 PM EST

Hey Dan,
in terms of WDM, it nicely lends itself to PCI Express ...

More...



C VanDorne

2/12/2013 4:27 PM EST

Excellent point! What ever happened to competing technologies being vetted by ...

More...

Silicon photonics vendors divided on IEEE spec

Rick Merritt

2/8/2013 1:01 AM EST

Intel keeps its power dry
Companies coming from an optical background typically are less familiar with complex modulation schemes such as PAM, and may consider it less technical viable. The group also takes costs and broad market adoption into consideration.

Ironically, Intel Corp. has not made any presentations to the group despite making a big splash recently by sampling 4x25G silicon photonics products based on a decade of research. It has only sent one engineer to the meetings so far, and that person did not attend on more than half of the meeting days.

Cisco is working on silicon photonics using 2.5-D chip stacks, said the head of Cisco’s transceiver group, speaking at DesignCon. Startups Kotura and Luxtra shared their plans separately to field 4x25G silicon photonics in 2014.

All four players hope to drive down 100G costs for a range of switches and other products. The meetings have drawn participants from a broad range of service, system and component vendors including Alcatel-Lucent, Deutsche Telekom, HP, Juniper, Microsoft and a range of startups.

"The entire industry is investing to bring the cost of optics down, and when that happens we can get to products with multiple 100G ports," said Siddharth Sheth, vice president of marketing at Inphi Corp., speaking on a panel at the Linley Group event here this week.

Related stories:
Slideshow: Intel Lights 100G Interconnects at Facebook Summit

DesignCon: Cisco packs silicon photonics on 3-D ICs

Kotura preps fab deal amid silicon photonics surge




liefg

2/8/2013 3:21 AM EST

This viz was created before one of the GOP debates to see which of the potential candidates had a better job creation record.-"Peter F. Spittler":http://presentationsolutions.org/2012/11/01/phil-melugin/

Sign in to Reply



iniewski

2/8/2013 1:58 PM EST

I attended few IEEE standard meetings and it was always like this...everyone was trying to position their technology as the best and co-opt as many others as possible...business as usual

Sign in to Reply



eafpres

2/10/2013 2:31 PM EST

Standards are good for commerce and the consumer, at a high level. However, if creating standards limits the R&D options for the relatively few major players spending billions on Si Photonics, then this could be counter-productive in the near term. Is it too early to be locking things down in 100 Gb/s standards?

Sign in to Reply



C VanDorne

2/12/2013 4:27 PM EST

Excellent point! What ever happened to competing technologies being vetted by the marketplace?

Sign in to Reply



Dan Dove

2/12/2013 1:34 PM EST

Nice article Rick. I should mention that the bullet items separating proposals out by company were not provided by me, but probably gleaned from the IEEE P802.3bm website.

Within the IEEE, participation is by individual and not by company. I did not, nor would I characterize proposals by company name.

Sign in to Reply



ReginaldConley

2/13/2013 2:03 PM EST

Hey Dan,
in terms of WDM, it nicely lends itself to PCI Express protocol- where lanes are bonded together (from x2 to x16)to increase port speed. WDM makes repurposing simple for transceiver makers. And since PCIe is inherently a short reach technology, would only complement the Ethernet space.
Would seem like a 'win-win-win' to me! :-)

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)