datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

News & Analysis

Slideshow: Berkeley wields big data to beat cancer

Rick Merritt

2/15/2013 5:38 AM EST


BERKELEY, Calif. – Researchers showed progress accelerating the search for gene-based cures for cancer and expanding the field of computer theory at an annual event sponsored by the University of California at Berkeley. They also discussed work on next-generation processor architectures and an effort to speed the development of an Internet of Things.

Computer scientist David A. Patterson called for a million genome warehouse to advance work on a cure for cancer. Today separate repositories hold less than 10,000 pieces of genetic information, many of them only partial representations of genes.

"There’s a chance for computer science to help build fast and accurate genetic pipelines and accelerate the move to personalized therapies--I want this in time to help me and my family," he said, noting researchers today often delete genetic data after completing experiments.

Patterson helped develop a tool called SNAP that provides significantly faster and more accurate genetic analysis that tools typically used by cancer researchers today (see below). Benchmarking tools are still needed to improve what are still highly subjective methods used in the field, he said.


Click on image to enlarge.

Separately, the university will spend $60 million over ten years on a new institute aimed to stake out new frontiers in computer science. "We want to develop a new theory of computing that extends far beyond its current reach and encompasses problems in other fields," said Richard Karp who will direct the effort.

"Many phenomena can be viewed as computational," he said. "If you look at how a living cell operates we can think of it as information processing; an economy is an information processing activity," he added.

The institute will host a symposium in late May in one of its first efforts to gather experts from a broad range of fields to study the possibilities.




iniewski

2/15/2013 10:31 AM EST

Very interesting...personally I think we should stop worrying about privacy, open the the platform and unleash the IoT apps..privacy is such as last century concept ;-)

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

2/16/2013 9:21 AM EST

As Scott McNealy used to say, privacy is over.

But the truth is it remains a viable concern for many, many individuals--including engineers who are reticent to publicly comment on stories as you do!

Sign in to Reply



docdivakar

2/19/2013 6:05 PM EST

@iniewski & @rick.merritt: the security issue is paramount to the adoption and acceptance of apps from IoT. In the healthcare arena, there are various regulations in US (like HIPAA, etc.) protecting the privacy of patient data.

Kris is partially right in saying that real privacy is so much a last century concept -one has to accept that up to some extent, service providers (mobiles phones for example) are constantly harvesting to target marketing. These types of 'private' data are several steps removed from personal medical records whose sanctity should be fully preserved and protected.

Some willingly give up personal data -most Facebook users fall into this category. I shudder to think of Facebook accessing my personal-area-network generated data from medical monitoring!

MP Divakar

Sign in to Reply



przemek

2/19/2013 1:40 PM EST

I had this insight that privacy was a fleeting phenomenon that developed in the mid-19th century when lots of people moved into cities, and lasted until recently. Before urbanization, people lived in small communities where everybody knew everything about everybody else--and Facebook is bringing it back :)

Sign in to Reply



DrQuine

2/17/2013 9:54 PM EST

The title of the article mentions cancer (although the body of the article seems to be computer hardware oriented). I believe that "cures" for cancer are often going to be very dependent upon individual genetic differences. Understanding which treatments work for which genetic make-ups is essential. Certainly there will need to be safeguards to prevent data mining to identify individuals in the database - but our future health depends upon such "big data" resources.

Sign in to Reply



aquitaine

2/19/2013 2:05 AM EST

Even though the actual treatment will be individually tailored, but the important thing is we'll know exactly what needs to be done to make it go away.

Personally I have my doubts we'll see anything from this anytime soon. Overall the War on Cancer has been a dismal failure, 40 years on and little practical result to show for it. There is one bright spot that I've seen, there has been a lot of success with HIV based immune therapies.

Sign in to Reply



any1

2/18/2013 8:02 PM EST

This is good stuff. It will be interesting to see how fast these initiatives progress. Of course 60 million dollars over 10 years is not a lot of money really.

Sign in to Reply



pete22

2/20/2013 4:56 AM EST

These kinds of initiatives are almost always about the institutional search for research money. Berkely will pump it for all it is worth.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)