News & Analysis
Slideshow: Google updates fiber offer
Rick Merritt
2/18/2013 5:55 AM EST
SAN JOSE, Calif. – Google is getting ready to add a service for small businesses to its residential gigabit fiber offering in Kansas City. The move is one more small step taking the search giant toward being a carrier.
Milo Medin, a former cable Internet entrepreneur and now vice president of access services at Google, gave an update on the offering at a meeting of a local IEEE group here. He was coy about Google’s plans but did repeat what he said in a summary foil (below) that “this is a beginning, and not an end.”
It’s clear Medin loves his work and sees a broader opportunity for Google. Google Fiber got its start when a small team at the company was preparing to provide comment to a U.S. government’s broadband plan in the works.
“Google management said, ‘why whine to the government, if this is important we should do it,’ so a team was formed,” Medin told a group of several dozen engineers.
Click on image to enlarge.
Eleven hundred cities responded to an offer that Google would create a gigabit residential test bed.
“It made us wonder if there may be an opportunity here,” said Medin who joined the team in 2010. “We were looking at it as an opportunity to offer a profitable service that could benefit the Web by offering a 100-fold step function in what’s available today,” he said.
That presents strategic riches and challenges. Ultimately, even wireless operators will succeed or fail based on how much fiber they have, but pulling fiber can be costly and complex, he added.
Competitors such as Comcast are highly profitable offering typically well under 100 Mbits/s. But Google has significant fiber linking its data centers, stakes in undersea cables and owns one of the world’s largest content distribution networks that currently powers YouTube, he said.
Every state and local government has its own laws and practices that makes it potentially costly to install fiber. That fact stalled Verizon’s FIOS offering when the carrier found it more profitable to invest in more wireless than wired infrastructure, he said.
Medin at the recent IEEE meeting in Silicon Valley
Milo Medin, a former cable Internet entrepreneur and now vice president of access services at Google, gave an update on the offering at a meeting of a local IEEE group here. He was coy about Google’s plans but did repeat what he said in a summary foil (below) that “this is a beginning, and not an end.”
It’s clear Medin loves his work and sees a broader opportunity for Google. Google Fiber got its start when a small team at the company was preparing to provide comment to a U.S. government’s broadband plan in the works.
“Google management said, ‘why whine to the government, if this is important we should do it,’ so a team was formed,” Medin told a group of several dozen engineers.
Click on image to enlarge.
Eleven hundred cities responded to an offer that Google would create a gigabit residential test bed.
“It made us wonder if there may be an opportunity here,” said Medin who joined the team in 2010. “We were looking at it as an opportunity to offer a profitable service that could benefit the Web by offering a 100-fold step function in what’s available today,” he said.
That presents strategic riches and challenges. Ultimately, even wireless operators will succeed or fail based on how much fiber they have, but pulling fiber can be costly and complex, he added.
Competitors such as Comcast are highly profitable offering typically well under 100 Mbits/s. But Google has significant fiber linking its data centers, stakes in undersea cables and owns one of the world’s largest content distribution networks that currently powers YouTube, he said.
Every state and local government has its own laws and practices that makes it potentially costly to install fiber. That fact stalled Verizon’s FIOS offering when the carrier found it more profitable to invest in more wireless than wired infrastructure, he said.
Medin at the recent IEEE meeting in Silicon Valley
|
|
|
|
|
Navigate to related information
enf13
2/18/2013 1:32 PM EST
Quoting IP transit prices (1$/mbit) is misleading. Huge companies like Google, OVH, Leaseweb heavily rely on public and private (point to point) peering. Public peering bandwidth is less than 0.1eur/mbit (100G ports @ AMS-IX, DE-CIX 2013)
Sign in to Reply
fbulk
2/21/2013 12:13 AM EST
How is a graph showing transit prices misleading? It's not stating that's what a service provider's total bandwidth costs are ... just what transit costs.
Sign in to Reply
iniewski
2/19/2013 11:00 AM EST
Do we really think Google is trying to get into a business of laying down the fiber? I don't think so. They probably want to show that having Gb/s Internet connection is cool. Personally I am not sure why would I need so much data so quickly. My eyes and ears are barely processing all the bits around me already...Kris
Sign in to Reply
Thomas_Fu
2/19/2013 8:22 PM EST
Internet bandwidth is the stumbling block to cloud computing. Now, Google is moving it.
Sign in to Reply
DrQuine
2/20/2013 7:41 PM EST
Chattanooga TN is recognized for their 1 Gb/s Internet ... but apartment dwellers must have a landlord that hasn't already committed to a competing (slower) service. Internet speed is wonderful and sometimes reveals that our "slow computer" was actually a slow Internet. Other times, unfortunately, one discovers how slow the destination web site is running.
Sign in to Reply