- Products
- Product Reviews
- Product How Tos
- New Product Releases
- Product Categories
Product Review
Chip-scale atomic clock approaches performance of modules, far exceeds TXCOs
Bill Schweber, Planet Analog1/18/2011 8:01 AM EST
If you think atomic clocks require a rack-sized unit or even just a somewhat smaller module, think again. The PC-board mountable Quantum SA 45s chip scale atomic clock (CSAC) (actually, it's an oscillator, of course) from Symmetricom, Inc. operates from a single 3.3 V supply (115 mW) and provides a 10-MHz high-impedance output, in a package which is 1.39 × 1.45 × 0.45 inches high (35.3 × 36.8 × 11.4 mm high), for a volume of about 15 cm3.
Developed using technology provided by partners Sandia National Laboratories and Draper Laboratory, stability of this oscillator is 2 x 10-10 at 1 sec. Compared to a conventional temperature- and oven-controlled crystal oscillator (TXCO and OXCO), the vendor claims the unit's power consumption is 1/10th to 1/20th as much, and yields performance which is 10 to 100 times better. Compared to conventional atomic clocks (including Symmetricom's own units), they say the CSAC is 1/3rd to 1/30th the size, at just 120th to 1/100th the power. {Note that the vendor is already a leading supplier of cesium-based atomic clocks, and acquired that well-known clock product line from Agilent Technologies--previously known as Hewlett-Packard--in 2005.]
So, how did they do it? Figure 1 details the construction of the core cell:

Functional elements include a tensioned polyimide suspension, and a microfabricated silicon-vapor cell, with a low-power vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) whose output passes through the vapor. The entire package, Figure 2, includes electronics, RS-232 interface, a low-power DSP, a double-layer magnetic shield (atomic resonance frequency is affected by such fields), all in a hermetically sealed, through-hole PCB-mountable package

In use, on a representative PCB, it looks like Figure 3:

The basic architecture is deceptively simple, Figure 4. The "natural" atomic microwave resonance frequency is synthesized from an RF local oscillator (LO), and a control loop locks the LO frequency to the atomic resonance.

Which applications need a CSAC, with GPS-based clocks so available and prevalent? First, there are applications where the GPS-based timing may not be accurate enough. But there are also many applications where GPS is unavailable, such as underwater exploration, underground drilling, geophysical research, and EMI shielded rooms. There are also in-the-field military situations where GPS and all EM waves are deliberately jammed by patrols, to prevent remote triggering of improvised explosive devices (IEDs), yet there is a need for precise communication-equipment synchronization among combat teams.
[Despite the complex construction, the CSAC is rugged, and will survive shock of up to 500 g in any axis. It is tested to the vibration profile described in MIL-STD-810, Method 514.5, Procedure 1, Category 24, minimum integrity, 7.7 g rms @0.04 g/Hz, 20 Hz to 1 kHz, -6 dB/octave 1 kHz to 2 kHz, 15 minutes/axis.]
The CA 45s CSAC may use vapor but it is not a "vapor" or vaporware product. It is shipping in two versions:
- Option 001: -10°C to +70°C, primarily for commercial applications
- Option 002: -40°C to +85°C, primarily for military applications
Prices begin at $1500 each in small quantity. For more information: contact Symmetricom, Inc.
Most Popular
Datasheets.com Parts Search
185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Our technical library houses over 4,000 high-quality sponsored white papers, application notes, reference guides, use cases—all organized by company.


Dr DSP
1/22/2011 2:55 PM EST
Maybe the next generation will use MEMs technology to create a wristwatch sized unit...
Sign in to Reply
hm
1/23/2011 1:18 AM EST
It looks little costly but it is wonderful product for military and aerospace industry. If they desing and give it in various form factor (to replace old obsolete devices), it will be very good for lagacy sustainment program in miliitary.
Sign in to Reply
Sensorguy_0623
1/26/2011 11:00 PM EST
The performance of this unit from the spec's given is really quite impressive especially if it can keep those spec's over temperature and vibration. I worked with a GPS timing receiver in the late '80s. We used a $40K cesium clock to monitor the performance of our system. The clock was very sensitive to temperature changes and power cycles. In a benign environment the long term stability of that $40K unit was about 5 x 10-11. In the early '90s, a rubidium clock was about 3 x 4 x 4 and cost $4K with similar performance in benign environments. These guys have built a pretty impressive device. You need to have worked in the field to really appreciate what they have.
Sign in to Reply
ToolCaddy
3/8/2011 5:20 PM EST
Yeah, that is a fantastic bit of technology. I too have worked with Rubidium and cesium clock standards.
Tony Parkes
Sign in to Reply
Streetrodder
12/23/2011 8:48 AM EST
We used cesium standards to manage the timing on our LORAN C transmitter timers in the USCG. At the time, they had their own rack and the room they were in was the most temp controlled on base. Now it's board mounted...wow.
Sign in to Reply