- Products
- Product Reviews
- Product How Tos
- New Product Releases
- Product Categories
Product Review
Innovative IC can't trap lightning, but can let you know it's coming
Bill Schweber4/30/2012 10:35 AM EDT
Unterpremstaetten, Austria—No need to tell this audience of the damage which lightning does to systems, circuits, and people. While good design practices, carefully placed suppression devices, and use of common sense by people can help minimize the damage, it would still be very useful to know when lightning is approaching and how far away it is.
To date, this has required relatively large, costly box-like instruments, but austriamicrosystems plans to change the situation radically with their AS3935 Franklin Lighting Sensor IC (named for Benjamin Franklin and his lightning experiments, of course), which they say is the first IC to perform this function. This tiny, low-power component, supported by a few small passives and a microcontroller for management and user interface, will enable lightning-detector key fobs, personal and portable warning instruments (GPS, fish finders, golf accessories), plus larger installations in networks, smart grids, and power systems.

The AS3935 Franklin Lighting Sensor IC from austriamicrosystems
uses an analog front end plus embedded algorithms
to sense the approach of lighting and the distance.
Unlike simplistic detectors which suffer from false alarms, the device uses a magnetic-field sensing coil as part of its RF receiver to detect the electrical emissions from lighting up to 40 km away down to 1 km. It assesses the distance not by signal strength alone but by analysis of the waveform itself using proprietary, integrated algorithms, based on standard meteorological survey patterns and data. As a consequence, it is not "fooled" by local disturbances such as microwave ovens, nearby motors, or similar transient sources, noted Johnsy Varghese, marketing manager, which soon makes people turn off any warnings (literally and figuratively).
[An aside: one of the nicest "do-it-yourself" projects for novice electronic hobbyists appeared in April 2002 QST (amateur radio), "A Lightning Detector for the Shack," (sorry, not online for non-subscribers). It uses four low-end transistors, some non-critical passive components, a 2.5V flashlight bulb, and 3V supply, and has no layout challenges. However, it is susceptible to false alarms, since it has no intelligent signal-processing algorithms; it is an all-analog circuit.]
The 4×4 mm, 2.4 to 5.5V AS3935 is a power miser, too, with drain of just 60 μA in listening mode (where it will be most of the time). It needs seven passive components needed, and has I2C and SPI ports for interface to the support microcontroller (MCU)—all signal-analysis algorithms are embed within the AS3935 and do not require any processing effort by the low-end MCU. Further, an automatic antenna-tuning mode reduces the tolerance constraints on the front end components and eases manufacturing concerns.

Within the AS3935, the output of the analog signal-conditioning circuitry
is analyzed by integrated waveform-analysis algorithms,
based on standard models and data.
Products such as this, which measure unusual physical occurrences, always raise the question: "so, how do you know it actually does what you claim it does?" In this case, the vendor has done field trials in Finland and at the Florida Institute of Technology (Florida Tech), one of the world's leading centers for lighting research, and tests are now underway in South Africa. Field data was compared to data from the National Lightning Detection Network, and has been designed and tested for both cloud-to-ground and cloud-to-cloud lightning, as well (many existing instruments only detect the former).
Pricing, support, and availability: the AS3935, in a 16-lead MLPQ package, is $3.55 (1,000 pieces) and is sampling now. An evaluation kit consisting of an evaluation module, a lightning-emulation unit (you do have to have that, right?), and a thumb drive with GUI, and hardware and software design files, is also available.
For more information: Go to http://www.austriamicrosystems.com/Lightning-Sensor/AS3935.
Most Popular
Datasheets.com Parts Search
185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Our technical library houses over 4,000 high-quality sponsored white papers, application notes, reference guides, use cases—all organized by company.


Sanjib.Acharya
4/30/2012 12:01 PM EDT
Great product! I wonder how they test this product...in the simulated lab environment? Or did they wait for the storms to perform field test?:-)
How accurately can it predict the location where the lightning is going to strike?
Sign in to Reply
EREBUS
4/30/2012 5:35 PM EDT
A spark gap should be a suitable tester. Living in an area with frequent thunderstorms, I should not have much trouble putting it to the test.
Sign in to Reply
BicycleBill
4/30/2012 6:03 PM EDT
Sorry, a spark gap is very unreliable and short-range--it may tell you when lightning hits directly or very close to it, but it won't sense lightning at some distance. To do that, you need to sense the EM field of the lightning. By the time the spark gap flashes over, it will be too close to you and too late to do anything in anticipation.
Plus, it will depend on placement, whatever "antenna" you are using, and many other factors.
Keep in mind that a typical gap's sparkover threshold is about 5-10 kV/cm--so, how big is your gap, and how close/strong does the lightning have to be to jump that gap?
A spark gap makes a good lightning arrestor, but not a detector, sorry
Sign in to Reply
Ryan Tennill
5/24/2012 1:38 PM EDT
I think EREBUS meant that the spark gab could be used as the source for testing the chip not that it could be used as a detector.
Sign in to Reply
hm
4/30/2012 8:55 PM EDT
Very interesting product. It will be challenging to test product which includes this part. Also, what will be next step? After detecting lightening what will next step to protect the product?
Sign in to Reply
IRSSYS
5/2/2012 8:33 AM EDT
I think erebus intended to use the spark gap as a tester for the IC, i.e. as a "lightning emulator"... but i might have gotten it wrong.
Sign in to Reply
vapats
5/2/2012 10:22 AM EDT
[An aside: [snip] April 2002 QST "A Lightning Detector for the Shack"]
Once upon a time, I read a fascinating article in a old hardcover compendium of C.L. Strong's "Amateur Scientist" columns from /Scientific American/; the EM pulses were termed 'spherics (from "atmospheric"), and a vacuum-tube detector circuit was described.
I suppose that the AS3935 will also detect EMP from nuclear explosions -- God forbid...
Sign in to Reply
GPBobby
6/10/2012 5:19 PM EDT
Living on a hill in Salt Lake City, I used to use a vacuum tube am radio, tuned between stations, to monitor the August thunderstorms. Many broad-ranging storms produce a strike per second. The sensitivity was such that I could hear many strikes which did not accompany a visible flash, but in general the closer the arc the louder the sound pulse. In every case I saw a strike (most cloud-to-cloud with some I estimated to be 15 to 20 miles distant), I could instantly hear the rf noise.
Sign in to Reply
GREAT-Terry
8/15/2012 11:19 PM EDT
Very interesting product. Just wonder if there is any competitions.
Sign in to Reply