Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
rob20166
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent chief: applications up, quality down
rob20166   4/21/2008 10:01:41 PM
NO RATINGS
It's simple: The Patent Office does not reward Examiners for quality work. An Examiner gets about 4-8 hours to complete the entire examination process; it's not enough. Instead, they do the best they can in limited time, and Dudas pretends that it is a class of applicants that are the problem. This is false. I was a U.S. Patent Examiner in the late 1990s, and since then went into private practice as a Patent Agent. It?s remarkable to me that someone who is supposedly intelligent, Dudas, can?t recognize the basic problem with the entire Office: Examiners are not rewarded for doing quality work. Instead, they get a few hours to do an extremely complicated job and are yelled at when it isn?t "good enough" or when they don?t work every weekend to make everything perfect. Will and do some applicants abuse such a system? Sure. But blaming a small number of applicants for the problems of the Office is disingenuous at best, and intentionally misleading from the actual problems at worst. Good quality examination will eliminate bad quality patents. Good quality examination will not happen by placing artificial restrictions on the front end of the process (limiting the number of claims, or RCEs or continuations). It will only punish prolific applicants. If you want to get rid of "bad" applications, change the way examination is done, particularly the way Examiners are rewarded for their work. If you keep the system that was there when I was there in the late 1990s (which was also there decades before I arrived), nothing will change. It's a difficult problem to fix, but no one wants to take it head on. Instead Dudas makes dumb comments that are off subject, misinterpreted by anti-patent types and changing the subject from the real problems at the Office.

JMWilliams
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent chief: applications up, quality down
JMWilliams   4/17/2008 5:28:58 PM
NO RATINGS
The underlying problem is that the law schools and working lawyers somehow have agreed that there exists something called "intellectual property", and that this includes patents (which give a right to deny use) and copyright (which deny a right to publish), among other things. A patent can PROTECT a thing, the thing being property; but the patent itself is not property. A patent is an administrative decision under the law. A copyright can not protect any thing; it can protect only the COPYING (not possession) of an expression EXCLUDING by law any merely physical thing. Likewise, a copyright itself is not property; it is an administrative decision under the law. The fact that a RIGHT can be transferred does not imply that there is property involved: Parents can transfer custody of a child, but this does not make the chils a kind of property. As the PTO author points out, the low quality of modern patent applications is because applicants are trying to buy "intellectual property" from the PTO(like bandwidth from FCC), rather than requesting that the PTO protect their innovative discoveries for a limited time. There is no such thing as "intellectual property". The very idea may be misunderstood by lawyers, but it is analogous to "imaginary reality".

bidare
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent chief: applications up, quality down
bidare   4/17/2008 6:45:33 AM
NO RATINGS
US PTO should make AN ALTERNATE directory of silly application filed. Claim with out proper invention claim needs to be rejected with three - six months PTO can even grade the patent awarded and can even rank them. In my opinion, patents should not be used as an insurance to hang around in the system. The raise in patent application is due to this. PTO should ask for a live demo to prove the efficacy in the PoC.



Most Recent Comments
tommyma518
 
KeesM
 
?-??>
 
annawood
 
HardwIntr
 
Darren.Galpin
 
Sheetal.Pandey
 
Wnderer
 
Sheetal.Pandey
Most Recent Messages
7/23/2014
6:22:42 AM
Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)