Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
dragun415
User Rank
Author
re: Commentary: Apple should clone the iPhone
dragun415   7/18/2008 8:17:40 AM
NO RATINGS
ROFL. Sounds like the same thing haters said about iPods. That every one wants alternatives, choices, variety. Guess they were wrong. Not saying you are. =P

Jon-Radiance
User Rank
Author
re: Commentary: Apple should clone the iPhone
Jon-Radiance   7/17/2008 2:44:20 PM
NO RATINGS
AMEN. I've been preaching the Apple-foot-shooting theory for years. Only time will tell, but I'd bet dollars-to-doughnuts apple will be paving the road for all the real players. They've got to learn that they can not go anywhere in the computing world until they open things up. The iPod is the one realm they'll hold for a long time - and that's not what I'd call computing! They need to just go ahead and shift their focus to hardware design, sans-computing.

Ace Deuce
User Rank
Author
re: Commentary: Apple should clone the iPhone
Ace Deuce   7/16/2008 6:21:34 AM
NO RATINGS
First, change the word "hoards" to "hordes." Thanks. The Android platform, including the hardware brought to market to support it, will have to provide some kind of superiority in features, carrier support, reliability, and/or price to dominate the market for mobile computing. Apple is already doing a fair job with these and actually is shipping product and selling applications from a growing number of developers. What compelling feature could the Android ecosystem provide that the iPhone ecosystem wouldn't be able to match? What niche could it serve that Apple couldn't serve if it so desired? How is a base of one million developers any better than a base of 100,000 when most users won't need more than a hundred good applications? Apple just needs to continue to please its customers and always be profitable in its mobile computing business. Android may well become a strong competitor, but we need to see it well distributed and used before we can compare it to the others already being used by paying customers.

sgmsg
User Rank
Author
re: Commentary: Apple should clone the iPhone
sgmsg   7/16/2008 3:40:59 AM
NO RATINGS
I dont agree. IBM gave artificial breath to Microsoft during his early age. That's the mean reason why Microsoft was growing that fast. Despite the fact that Apple is the second violin since 1985, they create twenty years later the best combo OS & hardware avalaible. Each quarter, the market share of Mac computer is growing faster. Microsoft's Vista can't fight Apple's Leopard. Apple have build a strong ecosystem. No company else can compete. What about the Iphone? I repeat this sentence all the time. Android gonna be for Google, Windows for Microsoft. Nokia rebought Symbian, to trying to compete equal to Apple. Today on a blog some says Google should buy Motorola to start at the same place. But I dont think is enough. Apple dominate the music with the duo Ipod-Itune. Apple strikes back with the duo Iphone-AppStore. Apple is cooking IHomeEntertainement-AppleTV II. Apple is also probably cooking Newton II-*(Appstore, Itune and/or AppleTV) I dont see Google neither Nokia, (forget Microsoft is playing wrong game with Yahoo) able to fight the "Apple mean machine". Of course Google have lot of money. so Apple can't "trôner sur ses lauriers". The near futur Apple should increase among of products specially phones, some rumors talk about real-keaybord-Iphone. That's a good idea to seduce businessmen, but is not enough. Interesting way seem Iphone-wifi cheaper, Iphone/pod-Home-"all-purpose-command"-domotic, with and important decrease of price for all the product to be reachable in emergent country. Apple has all the cards in their hands to get an easy win, let see if Apple is going to discard well.



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...