Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 7   >   >>
ReneCardenas
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
ReneCardenas   8/3/2011 6:00:48 PM
NO RATINGS
I would say to new students and newbies, learn BOTH syntax and merits of VHDL & Verilog languages. Then be prepared to excel in either one been used by the project at hand. I seen it many times, a project is launched using either verilog or VHDL, and members have to merge IP form the opposite language, and learn sideeffects in compliler and simulation applications. There are many ways to skin a cat, so use the tool that is appropiate for the job at the time of need.

rays14
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
rays14   8/3/2011 5:46:52 PM
NO RATINGS
University I went to swears by Verilog. Yet the big defense company sitting next door to it swears by VHDL. So I know both and can move from one to the other without a problem. However, proffesionally it has all been VHDL for me. If I need to do Verilog I have to move to California :(. But no Verilog in my town.

rays14
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
rays14   8/3/2011 5:42:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Haha. So you are the trouble maker who started this. Yep and so did windows.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
KB3001   8/3/2011 12:20:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Not really. From an academic point of view, VHDL is a better teaching language. Professors might choose Verilog for other reasons: company sponsorship, prevailing language in their research labs etc. but from a purely academic point of view, I doubt many would "choose" Verilog in teaching.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
KB3001   8/3/2011 12:13:48 PM
NO RATINGS
I would say start with VHDL and then switch to Verilog. VHDL is a well structured strongly-typed language with a strong declarative ethos. It can't be easily confused with other software languages e.g. C, which is a good thing for a newbie. Its verbose nature means however that it's more suitable for small designs. So when you get the HDL concept, switch to Verilog. It's a much more elegant language; and provided you know what you are doing, it should make you more productive. Also SystemVerilog is major extension of Verilog which allows for complete system design and verification within the same language. It is also widely used by big design companies for modelling, and in time for synthesis too. All in all, ignore System/Verilog at your own peril....

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
old account Frank Eory   8/3/2011 7:02:34 AM
NO RATINGS
It's interesting that this thread has been resurrected. Almost a year after my last post here, I still ask, where are all these VHDL coders? Defense, aerospace, Europe, Israel...and let's don't forget FPGA designers. Ok, I get it. As a DSP guy, I really appreciate some of the features of VHDL over Verilog. But when all is said and done, any decent designer should be able to adapt to whichever language his employer prefers. But if you're doing a real chip design, at some point (synthesis) you're going to deal with the foundry's std cell libraries that are Verilog. So the question really becomes, do you prefer to do your design in a mixed language VHDL + Verilog environment, or just in Verilog from top to bottom? I'm surprised at UdaraW's comment that the academic community prefers to teach Verilog. I would've thought just the opposite, since VHDL seems to me to be much more "academically pure". But industry tends to follow the herd (i.e., whatever is more widely used and thus cheapest), which would clearly be Verilog. Maybe it's another case of VHS vs. Betamax. Everybody knows that Betamax was a technically superior videotape standard, but VHS won anyway...

rays14
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
rays14   8/2/2011 6:18:15 PM
NO RATINGS
How do I get off this thread? I don't want anymore emails. Please help!! VHDL/Verilog is not solving my problem ;D

rays14
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
rays14   8/2/2011 6:17:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Lot of companies use VHDL. All the defense companies use it. Aerospace companies use it. I worked for defense, aerospace and nasa. So that is not a true statement that only NASA uses VHDL. That sounds typically like what a prof. would say. Proffesors are not a good source of real-world information. Industry is. Having said that, if you prefer verilog then use it. There are others who prefer VHDL. I don't see any diffucutly doing vector shift in either language because I use both. My garage projects are in verilog and work projects are in VHDL.

rays14
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
rays14   8/2/2011 6:12:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Don't do that. If the proffessor wants you to use verilog then use it. Trust me proffesors don't have much industry experience. On an average they have 3 months of industry experience as an intern. They do have phd's and are very sensitive about it. They can make your life miserable. So just get the project done in Verilog. These are just HDLs. Once you know how to design the language is not going to make any difference. Its personal prefference. I have designed hardware using both languages. Makes no difference. This is really a dumb thread because there will be a new language tomorrow and everybody will jump on that bandwagon.

rays14
User Rank
Author
re: Verilog versus VHDL (which is best?)
rays14   8/2/2011 6:08:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Trying to figure that out myself. Help!!

<<   <   Page 3 / 7   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...