Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
wassya
User Rank
Rookie
re: Automotive environment challenges MCU system design engineers
wassya   1/3/2010 12:31:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks to Mr. David Swanson for a very good article, I am very impressed about it. I want to comment this fragment (sure if only nobody will be angry): "Many times, there is the software/hardware trade-off situation. Typically, the software guy wins. If something can be done in software versus doing it in hardware, trust me, it gets done in software. After all, as long as there is space and bandwidth, additional software is "free."" In my opinion it can not be "software versus hardware trade-off situation" and SW's can win , because software was "build" on a hardware to do jobs that will be cost effective(space, components...) than HW modules. And a "trade-off situation" can appear only if SW's cost higher than HW's cost, and HW wins. I am hardware and software engineer, for those that will say that I am for HW side. Thanks for attention.

StuRat
User Rank
Rookie
re: Automotive environment challenges MCU system design engineers
StuRat   7/13/2009 6:11:20 PM
NO RATINGS
I detect a note of sarcasm in the "software is free" comment. I have been on the receiving end of that comment often enough that I have had to develop some standard responses, such as "If software is free, why is it so hard to change it during product validation?" or, "Software is free as long as your requirements stay unchanged." In the early days of automotive embedded design, most customers preferred (or at least pretended) to remain blissfully ignorant of the constraints of embedded design, since many came from the sheet metal world. Those days are changing with the new generation of engineers. Two axioms remain from those early days. 1. Software ain't really free. 2. There is no such thing as a "simple software fix".

sfpietri
User Rank
Rookie
re: Automotive environment challenges MCU system design engineers
sfpietri   9/16/2008 8:33:37 PM
NO RATINGS
This device is part of the Freescale - ST joint development. Probably someone forgot to mention it in the publication.



Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).