Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Daniel Payne
User Rank
CEO
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
Daniel Payne   10/29/2008 6:46:37 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't agree with the Nobel Laureates. Look at the money trail, these researchers just want more government funded grants and expect that a Democrat will supply that. We don't need to be spending $20Million in taxpayer's money to study the DNA of bears in Wyoming.

PCIe_Evangelist
User Rank
Manager
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
PCIe_Evangelist   10/29/2008 7:27:52 PM
NO RATINGS
I do not want to see any of this non-relevant political dialog in EE Times. There is enough of this garbage everywhere else.

Stillwater0
User Rank
Apprentice
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
Stillwater0   10/29/2008 7:29:15 PM
NO RATINGS
The Nobel Laureates are acting in their own self interest by supporting the candidate who is more likely to increase the size of their grants. This, however, is not necessarily in the interest of the taxpaying public who will be forced to subsidize their intellectual pursuits. Their criticism of the bank bailouts reflects their frustration with having to compete at the public trough with the other government funded pigs.

Guru of Grounding
User Rank
Rookie
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
Guru of Grounding   10/29/2008 7:48:38 PM
NO RATINGS
My oh my, haven't we become a cynical group! So it's all about money - according to marketing and management types. I'll remain a bit more optimistic thanks, and continue to believe that scientific research ultimately benefits all of us, even if not in the next quarter's bottom-line!

gmorita
User Rank
Rookie
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
gmorita   10/29/2008 9:47:53 PM
NO RATINGS
The comments above are nothing less than I would expect to hear from upper management and marketing types who are so far removed from the actual research and hard work that goes into creating a new technology that can be translated into new products. Without new products and technologies to drive the economy there would little need for the aforementioned nay-sayers. I would argue that those who would take funds away from basic research are short changing our future competitiveness. You can never predict where the next breakthrough will occur.

legs ortiz
User Rank
Rookie
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
legs ortiz   10/29/2008 10:26:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow. Even Nobel Laureates now get character assassination. It is a sad state of affairs for the once leader of global innovation. In reality, our country has not had a strong Science and Technology policy for over 10 years, as the majority of funding goes to the healthcare sector to create more drugs, which make more profits right off the bat. Somehow there is this missing memory bank in part of this audience that without the U.S.Government's funding of numerous programs, we would not have the microchip, avionics, internet, materials and even the infrastructure of the super highway. Come on guys! Lets get straight about true investment instead of feeding the tit suckers at the DOD and Big Pharma! We need a policy that creates jobs for us = not just for Wall Street. Isn?t it amazing how little those in the so called ?tech industry? really understand about science policy? From a glance, it looks like there is too much Fox News time!

Ratgebber
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
Ratgebber   10/30/2008 1:17:16 AM
NO RATINGS
How sweet: M&M talents preaching about tax payers money... Almost every significant technological breakthrough such as semiconductors and the internet was invented by academics and paid for by tax payers money. The M&M types would not hesitate to out source it if they could make an extra buck for themselves etc. To turn the tables on the economy the country needs someone with a vision, someone with an ear to innovators. Unfortunately, the Republican party can only offer drilling in Alaska or other petrodollar solutions.

Guru of Grounding
User Rank
Rookie
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
Guru of Grounding   10/30/2008 1:59:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Even though I was a registered Republican for over 40 years, I'm now a Democrat and will be proudly voting for Obama. It's not just economics but civil rights issues and their kissing up to the religious right has turned me off to Republicans. Here in California, Prop 8 attempt to keep gays second-class citizens and the Mormons and Catholics are running a shameful and deceitful campaign based on lies, prejudice, and hate. They can hate whomever they want but making it constitutional law flies in the face of what this country is about! The fact that they use tax-exempt money (over $25 million) to do this makes me see red!!

Avagadro
User Rank
Rookie
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
Avagadro   10/30/2008 2:48:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, let's keep politics out of this forum. But since I have started to respond - I have seen GOVERNMENT HOUSING - that's enough for me to veto ANY government backed spending for R&D. Does Ethanol ring a bell for any of you? Bad government science has been driving the markets, and destabilizing the investment community. Why would I invest in alternative energy company when the US goverment can show up and devastate the market by artificially maninpulating the true "costs" of energy? And yes LEGZ, there have been a number of R&D things that were INVENTED by various firms that were powered by my tax dollars but the COMMERCIALIZATION is the key. Name that last technology that was commercialized by the US Government. IN fact, name ANYTHING that the US Government does well - other than TAX TAX TAX. Oh I guess that they are also pretty good at SPEND SPEND SPEND. If one INSISTS that the US Government get involved in R&D, take it out of some other government agency's budget. I would vote for eliminating HUD, BATFE, and Fannie/ Freddie (oops too late), and the billions that we send to people on other continents and the UN. How's that for a start? Remember - no more politics on this site!

Truthbetold
User Rank
Rookie
re: Nobel Laureates back Obama. Do you agree?
Truthbetold   10/31/2008 1:44:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Wow..avagadro seems to have left out the incovenient truths about government funded research. The government never does the commericialization. It's the successful researchers who commericialize the technology, which in turn has always benfited the technology. It's the Govt funded NSF research money that supported Seregey Brin and Larry pages' research work (see anatomy of the search engine paper) that led to Google. It's the same DARPA (Govt) funded money that led to CDMA related research at MIT, now succesfully commericialized by Qualcomm. Processor companies like Intel, IBM and AMD will thank heavens for the govt supported research of hennessy and patterson, that led to the development of RISC processors. There are scores and scores of examples of such instances. Who knows, the odd study of DNA of polar bears can help in perfecting DNA mapping process, which can ultimately aid the society in finding cures such as Alzheimers disease.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Steve Wozniak Reacts to Latest iPhone
Max Maxfield
6 comments
Funnily enough, just a few days ago as I pen these words, I was chatting with my wife (Gina the Gorgeous) when she informed me that -- as a kid -- she had never played at making a ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)