Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: Video: M'soft exec on federal research, multicore
Mapou   12/4/2008 8:53:38 PM
Is Dan Reed for real? Any talk of hybrid or heterogeneous processors is a sign that Reed/Microsoft does not fully appreciate the radical nature of the multi/manycore paradigm shift that is around the corner. Programming hybrid processors is worse than pulling teeth with a crowbar. Why take that route? It does not make sense. On the contrary, logic dictates that we should lean toward a homogeneous/universal computing model. The stark reality is that the current computing paradigm is broken and it has been broken ever since Charles Babbage dreamt up his analytical engine. The industry still has the same basic idea of what a computer should be that Babbage had in his day. Parallel computing was the furthest thing from his mind. There can be no transition. What is needed is a complete break from the past and a dogged willingness to allow the failing legacy technology of the 20th century to wither into oblivion and museums. Otherwise we'll be spending huge sums of money to train a bunch of people to write expensive software that will not run on the parallel machines that are coming down the pike. Likewise, all this talk about F# and functional programming being well suited to multicore is a red herring. FP is counterintuitive and non-deterministic. It is a continuation of the same process/thread mentality that has gotten the industry into this mess in the first place. FP does not make easier to train millions of programmers for parallel programming jobs, I'm sorry. And, as I wrote in a response to Pat Gelsinger's video talk on EETimes yesterday, we can all forget about multithreading as a viable solution. You know, I am really coming to the point where I seriously doubt that either Intel or Microsoft can provide the type of leadership that is needed to get the industry around this difficult period in computer history. I am very disappointed. It is time for the baby boomer generation to step aside and let a new generation have a turn at the helm. You guys got us into this mess. Now you have run out of ideas simply because you are too old and set in your ways. If you're truly interested in solving this problem, as opposed to holding on to your job until you retire, Google "How to Solve the Parallel Programming Crisis" for more info.

EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Oh, No! My Antique Analog Meter Has Twitched Its Last
Max Maxfield
Well, life is certainly full of ups and downs, isn't it? When it comes to the antique analog meters I'm using in a number of my hobby projects, things appeared to be going swimmingly well, ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)