Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Guru of Grounding
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Use a Better DAC?
Guru of Grounding   12/10/2008 6:35:38 PM
NO RATINGS
The author has confused the issue of differing level standards between professional and consumer audio equipment. First, the NOMINAL or "reference level" signals are +4 dBu (1.23 volts rms) in pro gear and -10 dBV (0.316 volts rms) in consumer gear. The 2.0 volt rms or 5.6 volt pk-pk number for consumer gear refers to a FULL-SCALE rating. This level is only 16 dB higher than the consumer reference by the way, not 22 dB. Therefore, a consumer output is still legitimately rated at -10 dBV reference level but will clip at an output level 16 dB higher - this is referred to as "headroom". How much headroom is enough depends on the program material, but typically ranges from 12 dB to 20 dB. Professional systems operate at reference/nominal levels 12 dB higher than this, so they must be capable of passing signals up to +20 dBu (7.75 volts rms or 22 volts pk-pk) without clipping to preserve 16 dB of headroom. The main difference between "pro" and "consumer" or "MI" (musical instrument) gear is the choice of interface. Unbalanced interfaces are suitable only for very short cables. Common-impedance coupling is inherent to unbalanced interfaces and is its downfall in high-performance audio systems. Only gear with balanced interfaces is worthy of the term "professional". However, modern "pro" interfaces based on simple diff-amps have tarnished the reputation of balanced interfaces unfairly - but that's another story - see http://www.jensentransformers.com/an/ingenaes.pdf for the how and why. Then you'll realize why the IEC changed the test procedure for "balanced inputs" back in 2000. --- Bill Whitlock, president and chief engineer, Jensen Transformers, Inc., AES Fellow and IEEE Senior Member.

Guru of Grounding
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Use a Better DAC?
Guru of Grounding   12/6/2008 11:23:55 PM
NO RATINGS
The author has confused the issue of differing level standards between professional and consumer audio equipment. First, the nominal or "reference level" signals are +4 dBu (1.23 volts rms) in pro gear and -10 dBV (0.316 volts rms) in consumer gear. The 2.0 volt rms or 5.6 volt pk-pk number for consumer gear refers to a full-scale rating. This level is only 16 dB higher than the consumer reference by the way, not 22 dB. Therefore, a consumer output is still legitimately rated at -10 dBV reference level but will clip at an output level 16 dB higher - this is referred to as "headroom". Professional systems operate at levels 12 dB higher than this, so they must be capable of passing signals up to +20 dBu (7.75 volts rms or 22 volts pk-pk) without clipping to preserve 16 dB of headroom. The main difference between "pro" and "consumer" or "MI" (musical instrument) gear is the choice of interface. Unbalanced interfaces are suitable only for very short cables. Common-impedance coupling is inherent to unbalanced interfaces and is its downfall in high-performance audio systems. Only gear with balanced interfaces is worthy of the term "professional". However, modern "pro" interfaces based on simple diff-amps have tarnished the reputation of balanced interfaces unfairly - but that's another story - see http://www.jensentransformers.com/an/ingenaes.pdf for the how and why. Then you'll realize why the IEC changed the test procedure for "balanced inputs" back in 2000. --- Bill Whitlock, president and chief engineer, Jensen Transformers, Inc., AES Fellow and IEEE Senior Member.



Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Engineer's Bookshelf
Caleb Kraft

The Martian: A Delightful Exploration of Math, Mars & Feces
Caleb Kraft
6 comments
To say that Andy Weir's The Martian is an exploration of math, Mars, and feces is a slight simplification. I doubt that the author would have any complaints, though.

The Engineering Life - Around the Web
Caleb Kraft

Surprise TOQ Teardown at EELive!
Caleb Kraft
1 Comment
This year, for EELive! I had a little surprise that I was quite eager to share. Qualcomm had given us a TOQ smart watch in order to award someone a prize. We were given complete freedom to ...

latest comment elctrnx_lyf congrats to rajeev prasad !!!
Design Contests & Competitions
Caleb Kraft

Join The Balancing Act With April's Caption Contest
Caleb Kraft
58 comments
Sometimes it can feel like you're really performing in the big tent when presenting your hardware. This month's caption contest exemplifies this wonderfully.

Engineering Investigations
Caleb Kraft

Frankenstein's Fix: The Winners Announced!
Caleb Kraft
8 comments
The Frankenstein's Fix contest for the Tektronix Scope has finally officially come to an end. We had an incredibly amusing live chat earlier today to announce the winners. However, we ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)