Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: Report: Ultrawideband dies by 2013
davidnix   8/2/2014 4:24:01 PM
I am the VP of Engineering at Alereon, one of two remaining UWB chip vendors. Since your article in 2009, a couple of interesting story arcs have developed. First, UWB continued to fade from the PC and CE space in favor of WiFi solutions just as your post predicted. That fading claimed Wisair, which shuttered in 2013 - right on schedule.

However, an unexpected development has kept UWB alive and well. After extensive study, the U.S. military  determined that UWB is the only RF technology that addresses the requirements and constraints for turning all soldier-carried gear wireless. In May, the U.S. Army awarded $800 million in contracts for next generation night-vision weapon sites and goggles to DRS and BAE. Alereon's UWB radio provides the wireless link between the weapon site and goggle to enable a new feature called Rapid Target Acquisition. This feature is the next level in providing U.S. soldiers with an edge in combat. In addition, the military's CERDEC labs and PEO Soldier office have asked for a dozen proposals that feature UWB as the *required* wireless technology - all geared toward replacing soldier cables in a program called Intra-Soldier Wireless.

Without the military market, UWB would be barely breathing. However, we can thank Uncle Sam for resurrecting UWB in a wholly unexpected fashion! It has life after all!

User Rank
re: Report: Ultrawideband dies by 2013
Santhoff   5/27/2009 1:36:59 PM
Teacher, have you been drinking the WiMedia Kool-aid? Low power is the promise of UWB however WiMedia's implementation of UWB was by no means "Low Power" at 2 to 3 watts power consumption. (It takes a lot of power to operate those Giga Bits per second+ ADC's and DAC's along with the FEC and other baseband logic blocks) compared to some of the most recent WiFi chips at less than 300mW it's hard to claim WiMedia is "Low Power" with a straight face. You do make a good point about Bluetooth with one major exception. At the time many people were declaring "Bluetooth dead", Bluetooth companies were shipping millions of Bluetooth chips annually. It just took BT longer to ramp than expected. How many WiMedia chips have really honestly shipped to date? The real number is less than a million and possibly maybe even less than 100K. Go to any major brick and mortar stores that sells electronics such as Best Buy, Radio Shack, Walmart, Target, Fry's Electronics and just try to find ANY WiMedia products. Zero.

User Rank
re: Report: Ultrawideband dies by 2013
zei   5/27/2009 8:14:25 AM
Bluetooth was also announced to be dead - is it? It is not, because a few innovative companies survived the battle for the market. The same will happen for UWB. The reason is that there a very easy to understand advantage of UWB radio technology compared to other ones: the energy consumption per transmitted bit is extremely low! This saves battery live time for portable devices and it saves energy in general, which is on the agenda today everywhere. We talk about 5-10 times less energy consumption for the transfer of the same amount of data - so normally UWB radio technology is a must for any producer/vendor of portable devices with big amount of data storage (like Digi-Cams and Video/Audio-Devices) and it is also nice to have even for stationary devices taking into account the enormous amount of energy potentially saved by applying UWB radio technology together with appropriate protocols.

User Rank
re: Report: Ultrawideband dies by 2013
gafisher..1   5/15/2009 10:27:13 AM
The death knell tolled for UWB when the FCC redefined the concept to mean "multiple narrow bands." UWB became the technological equivalent of what the media call a "partial-birth abortion," and a botched one at that.

rick merritt
User Rank
re: Report: Ultrawideband dies by 2013
rick merritt   5/4/2009 6:04:27 AM
Do you know of any significant wireless USB designs in the works? If UWB fades now, when might it stage a comeback?

As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...